Dax EA

Thank you for your feedback. I respect your experience, but I need to clarify several important points for accuracy and transparency for other readers. The strategies are real and documented.
This EA is based on real, rule-based strategies, and they have been publicly explained multiple times in the public group with charts and market context. The DAX market has been trading at historical all-time highs with extremely tight weekly ranges for an unusually long period. This type of market condition is exceptional and has not occurred even in the last 4 years. Such environments are objectively challenging for any non-martingale, risk-controlled strategy. Market conditions ≠ strategy quality.
A strategy not performing well during a very specific, rare market phase does not make it “not working.” It means the market regime is unfavorable. This is exactly why I released two major updates during this period: First update: Fast-closing logic to reduce exposure Second update: Intraday-focused logic with stricter criteria, designed specifically to adapt to these conditions
Both updates were released proactively, not reactively, and they are now working much better in the current environment. About signals and holidays.
MQL5 automatically disables signals after periods of inactivity (for example during holidays). This happened several times, and the signals were re-added accordingly. The claim that there were “no trades for several months” is simply incorrect — the signals were visible and active before the holiday period. Public group vs channels.
I intentionally run a public discussion group, not a one-way marketing channel. This allows buyers to ask questions, challenge ideas, and see real explanations — something many sellers avoid by using channels where only they can speak. Transparency sometimes attracts criticism, but it is done for the benefit of users, not marketing optics. Support acknowledgment.
I appreciate that you acknowledged the support quality. I consistently provide updates, explanations, and assistance, even during difficult market conditions. Finally, no EA — including mine — can guarantee profitability in all market regimes, especially without using grid or martingale techniques. This product prioritizes risk control and long-term survival, not short-term illusionary gains. I wish you success in your trading journey and thank you for using the EA. ***** New reply to your new answer about older signals: Regarding Myfxbook and the accounts you mentioned:
I was originally running 4 different IC Markets accounts only because the strategies were separated into different groups at that time. Later, all strategies were consolidated into one EA and one chart, which made running multiple accounts unnecessary. When users repeatedly asked why everything wasn’t running on a single account, I adjusted the setup accordingly. Since I couldn’t open a new IC Markets account at that time, I created a Tickmill account specifically for visibility and consolidation purposes. The original IC Markets accounts were then reused for other EA signals and ongoing tests, as IC Markets accounts are still needed for new developments and are generally better accepted by users. So to be very clear:
This has nothing to do with lack of trust in my EA. It was purely a technical and organizational decision, based on strategy structure, broker availability, and user feedback. When the signal is re-added, you’re free to update your review if you wish — but that was never my request.

Hello Torsten, thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I’d like to clarify one important point: I did not disable the signal to hide results. As I explained before, I switched to a single default signal with Fast Closing = True to avoid confusion for new users. All of the older signals are still openly available on MyFXbook, so nothing has been hidden (this has also been mentioned in the public MQL5 chat). The recent difficult period is mainly due to the choppy conditions around all-time highs. That’s exactly why the Fast Closing option was introduced — to reduce the impact of false breakouts. This wasn’t about protecting sales; it was about providing a clearer picture of how the system adapts. On your point about RR: scalping strategies naturally produce many smaller wins versus fewer, larger losses. The idea behind trailing and Fast Closing is to minimize damage in tough conditions, often closing trades at breakeven or with small gains instead of letting them hit full SL. Recently, during the EU first hour (the main working time of the EA), the market has been in a narrow range, which is why you’ve seen many small profits. As I’ve shown in the screenshots in the comments thread and the Public Index group, once the accumulation phase ends and strong moves begin, the TP levels hit are much larger than the stop losses — even with trailing enabled. In such phases, recovery doesn’t take dozens of trades; sometimes just a few strong trades or a couple of good days are enough to offset prior drawdowns. (For reference: Comment #24
) I really appreciate that you’re open to re-evaluating your review when conditions improve. I’ll continue to provide full transparency and fast support so you can see the long-term value of the system.

Hello, thank you for your feedback. The EA has indeed gone through a tough first couple of months — mainly due to the very choppy conditions we’ve had recently. This is part of trading, and short losing periods can happen, especially at all-time highs when liquidity is thinner. The important point is that the EA is designed for long-term stability. When conditions align, it recovers quickly, and a few strong trades or good weeks are often enough to offset earlier drawdowns. That’s why I encourage patience and proper risk settings. I truly appreciate your openness to update the review if results improve, and I’ll continue providing full transparency so you can see the system’s performance over time.

Let’s be clear: a temporary losing period is not the same as a scam. We’ve discussed this many times in the group — when indices are at all-time highs, liquidity becomes thinner and slippage increases. This impacts results across all strategies, not just mine. To reduce confusion, I consolidated everything into one default signal with Fast Closing = True, which I also personally switched to. This wasn’t about “removing losing strategies”; all the older signals remain transparently available on MyFXbook, exactly as before. From the very beginning, I’ve answered every question you raised, sometimes in detail within minutes. That’s why it feels unfair to drop a 1★ across every category, including Support, when you’ve had full and immediate assistance. This EA is designed for long-term stability, and short periods of drawdown are part of trading. When market conditions normalize, the strength of the strategy becomes clear again.

Thank you so much, Aller, for the thoughtful review. I truly appreciate your continued trust in my work. It means a lot to hear such feedback from someone who has followed my EAs over time. I’ll keep doing my best to deliver transparent, high-quality products. Wishing you great results with the DAX EA!