ArtQuant Gold

BEST gold grid EA in market

사용자가 평가에 대한 코멘트를 남기지 않았습니다

I've been using the EA since July 7, and so far I've made a 30% profit. Some strategies naturally come with higher drawdowns, but if you perform thorough backtesting and anticipate different market conditions, you can make good money.

⛔️ MY HONEST REVIEW: I used this EA on my VPS for some time. When I logged back into the account after a few weeks, I was shocked to discover that it had been completely destroyed. My account was margin-called not once, but twice: first on July 1, and then again on July 2 with the small amount that remained. This is a high-risk grid EA with a very real possibility of wiping out the entire account. What concerns me even more is the seller’s apparent lack of transparency. His own signals have reportedly blown multiple times, after which they were closed and replaced with new ones as though nothing had happened. Other users have already shared screenshots documenting this behavior. After each major failure, the author releases new updates or “patches,” and the same disastrous periods then suddenly disappear from the updated backtests. This makes me seriously question whether those backtests represent the EA’s true historical performance. In my opinion, they appear heavily optimized around previous failures and should not be trusted as evidence of safety. There also seems to be a cult-like community around the seller, where users constantly post winning trades while completely ignoring the blown accounts and margin calls. This creates a highly misleading impression that the EA only makes money, while the serious losses are hidden, dismissed or quickly forgotten. In my opinion, this can easily deceive new buyers who do not know the full history. Buyers deserve to see everything: failed signals, margin calls, blown accounts, previous versions and the real performance before each update. This EA destroyed my account twice. It is extremely dangerous, and I strongly regret purchasing it. Only use it if you are fully prepared to lose your entire deposit.

Great EA!

ACCOUNT BLOWN: Been using this EA for almost 3 weeks and it traded only once in my account and made $5, on a $2k account. After this it made a very dangerous grid and BLOW MY ACCOUNT.Support from author is useless... he is basically asking you for proof of purchase(this is the most important thing for him) and then if you need anything it says you should not disturb him during the weekend or whatever. I would not recommend this EA, it's very expensive for what it can offer. there are a lot better EAs with better price than this.

Good EA.

This is a masterpiece with extremely high flexibility and possesses almost all the elements you would expect from an EA. I tested it from various angles before using it on a real account, and as an EA targeting gold trading, it is excellent overall and I think it is one of the best EAs available to individual traders. High flexibility usually means there is a risk that the EA will be completely different depending on the user's level and preferences, but ArtQuant's basic design is so good that I recommend setting it up according to the recommended initial settings first, and then fine-tuning it as needed in response to changes in market conditions once you become familiar with the EA and the gold market. You need to be careful with the risk settings, but don't set it with vague ideas like low risk or high risk, but verify it with backtesting. You will be surprised by its robustness. I started using it on the recommendation of a friend, and it was a great decision. I also highly recommend it.

사용자가 평가에 대한 코멘트를 남기지 않았습니다

Running ArtQuant for some time with good results. It's a selective system, doesn't overtrade, and that's a feature, not a flaw. The dev clearly put serious work into this. Communication is fast and honest. It's gonna stay in my main portfolio, 10/10

Je suis convaincu par cet EA spécialisé sur l'or (XAUUSD). Ce qui m'a le plus frappé : la constance des résultats. Pas de mois miraculeux suivi d'un effondrement, mais une progression régulière et des drawdowns maîtrisés. C'est rare, et ça change tout sur le long terme. Autre point fort : la flexibilité. Avec 12 stratégies disponibles, on peut construire son propre set selon son profil de risque. Que vous soyez conservateur ou plus agressif, il y a une configuration qui vous correspond. Enfin, je veux dire un mot sur Miguel, le développeur. Il a fait face à une vague de détracteurs — comme tout produit qui performe — mais il est resté présent, réactif, et toujours disponible pour le suivi client. Ce niveau d'accompagnement post-achat est vraiment rare dans ce milieu. Je soutiens son travail sans réserve. En résumé : un EA sérieux, des résultats prouvables, et un développeur qui assume. Fortement recommandé.

At the end of the day, actions and results speak louder than words. The most important thing is for the product to prove its value through its performance in the market. We can all look forward to seeing what it achieves in the future.

WARNING: Hardcore Overfitting & Critical Loop Bugs! Pure Backtest Trap. Do not be fooled by the unbelievable millions this EA makes in recent 2026 backtests. It is a textbook example of extreme overfitting and a dangerous trap for real capital. Here is what emerged from rigorous technical testing: Extreme Overfitting / Look-Ahead Suspicion: While the EA shows absurd, surreal profits in early 2026, switching the backtest period to 2021 with the exact same settings results in immediate, steady losses. The strategy has zero robustness and cannot adapt to different market cycles. It was coded exclusively to fit recent data to trick buyers. Critical Code Loop Bug: During the tests, the EA completely froze due to a hardcoded lot limit. The Journal repeatedly spammed the error: "Max Total Lots limit reached. Current: 0.00 Next: 3.38 Limit: 3.00". Because of this flaw, the EA gets stuck in an infinite loop, leaving open trades exposed to the market without any recovery or exit strategy. Insane Risk & Fake Protection: To achieve those fake backtest numbers, the EA relies on a highly aggressive grid/multiplier logic combined with 1:500 leverage. The equity drawdown is massive (over $119,000 in my tests). The built-in drawdown protection entirely failed to trigger at the set 30% limit, exposing the account to a total wipeout (79%+ loss) before the software even realized it. This is a highly unstable, poorly coded "backtest machine" designed only for marketing purposes. Extremely dangerous for real accounts. Stay away! Final note: I unfortunately fell for this trap and spent $699 to purchase it just two days ago. I deeply regret this purchase and highly recommend saving your money.

Its a great EA and the latest update has brought some real in-demand features. The Dev is certainly knowledgable and reliable. I look forward to the continious imporvements of the EA.

This EA is absolutely GEM! I cannot believe it was not on top of MQL. While some of the EAs highly rated EA on top lost me money this GEM is like sniper, precise entries and grid ALWAYS closed with Profit. Only people that have written negative reviews are either competitors that want to demote good product OR too impatient as this EA is extremely picky when it trades but when it does it always WINS! Beside this Miguel has been very helpful on receiving feedback and suggestions on what could be made better. Miguel your efforts have paid off! I hope we see more similar products. I have more than 50 EAs and this is in my top 5! Well done and thank you!

I am very disappointed with this EA. During my backtesting, the results on the tester looked promising, which is why I decided to purchase it. However, my live account experience has been completely different. The EA remained inactive for several days without opening any trades. When it finally started trading, the same market conditions that produced profitable results on my demo account resulted in multiple losing trades on my live account. The difference between the demo and live performance was much larger than I expected. Based on my experience, the results shown on a demo account were not representative of the results I obtained in real trading. I understand that live trading involves spreads, slippage, and execution differences, but the gap between demo and live performance was significant enough that I cannot recommend this product. What made the situation even more frustrating was the lack of support from the author. I contacted the developer and attempted to discuss the issue and find a solution, but I received no response. When customers experience problems with a product, they should at least be able to expect communication and assistance from the seller. Potential buyers should thoroughly test the EA on a live account with minimal risk before committing substantial capital. EDIT:

When I contacted the developer regarding the significant difference between the demo and live account performance, I was hoping to work together to identify the cause and find a solution. Instead of investigating the issue in depth, the discussion quickly became defensive and dismissive.as a customer, I expected a genuine effort to analyze the problem rather than having my concerns dismissed because other users or the developer's own account were reportedly profitable.

My experience on the live account was negative, and the support I received did not give me confidence that customer concerns are taken seriously.

As an algorithmic trader with over 6 years of market experience, having analyzed and traded with more than 300 Expert Advisors throughout my career, I am extremely demanding regarding the tools I integrate into my trading. After rigorously evaluating the work of Miguel Ángel Vico Alba, I can affirm that we are looking at one of the most solid developments in the algorithmic ecosystem. In an industry (and specifically on MQL5) where unfortunately there is an abundance of snake oil salesmen, decompiled codes, and those who appropriate the work of others, it is essential to identify and support real developers. The structure, cleanliness, and logic of this algorithm prove that Miguel is the original creator of his work, a 100% legitimate programmer who masters the architecture behind his systems. I already knew firsthand the technical quality of his developments thanks to the proven success of two of his previous systems: Tsunami and GoldenEyes. However, this latest version takes trading to a completely higher level. It is specifically designed and calibrated for professional traders looking to manage capital seriously (ideal for prop firm accounts or investment portfolios), always maintaining a strict and realistic balance between expected return and risk control. It is not an over-optimized system meant to deceive in a backtest, but a real tool for long-term survival and profitability. One of the most remarkable points of this update is the ability to test and evaluate the 12 strategies integrated into the robot. This shows absolute confidence in the technical development of the product; there are no black boxes, but rather a range of truly robust operational logics that allow the manager to adapt their market exposure according to their needs. Having access to an EA of this quality is a qualitative leap. If you are looking for a system developed from scratch by its true author and designed for institutional risk management, this is undoubtedly one of the best tools available on the market. Impeccable technical work.

This is by far the best Gold EA on the entire market place. Its a professional system that was designed for long-term account growth - if you know, how to use it properly. This EA waits for the right opportunity and strikes with amazing precision - had only great results so far. It became my favorite EA. Miguel is hard-working author that's also very friendly and professional. If there's a project and a person that deserves your support - its this one. I would strongly recommend this EA to anyone - both beginners and also advanced users.

I've been running ArtQuant Gold v2.3 for a week now on my Live IC Markets account and the results are very solid. I'm already up 4% in just one week using the safest settings (0.01 fixed lot). The '12 Cores' logic is impressive to watch—it doesn't just jump into every move, but waits for high-probability setups. With a latency of 2.8ms, the execution has been spot on, especially on the quick Sell trades we had this week. What really sold me is the risk management. I have the DD control active to protect my capital, which gives me peace of mind to just let it run on the VPS. It's clearly a professional tool designed for consistency, not a gamble. Great job by the dev, highly recommended for anyone looking for a stable Gold EA!

Its was time now , the most reliable bot i have used so far from mql , the author replies all my doubts . He knows what he is doing and his robot works perfect . Perhaps one of the most successful bot on the entire market place . Highly recommend it .