Revert Edge

I'll let the numbers on my demo account do the talking (last 6 months):

Profit factor Winners Winner% Losers Loser%

0.27 4 29.0 10 71.0

0.41 10 34.0 19 66.0

0.68 15 44.0 19 56.0

0.96 14 54.0 12 46.0

0.79 9 56.0 7 44.0

0.44 15 36.0 27 64.0

Also the reason why you should never buy something without live signal. Probably the reason is it doesn't work.

I feel like now is a good time to tell others my experience thus far. I've purchased this January 11th and have used this consistently even before his latest major update. Before I even loaded this onto a live account, I did many backtests. I focused on backtesting all of the available pairs individually to see which were the best of the best (most consistent and least drawdown since 2012). Since my broker has bad spreads for a handful of the pairs, I knew I had to utilize his manual ability. I ended up focusing on about 5 pairs and I only was profitable. I didn't make a crazy amount but it consistently did well. I feel like Levi should have only traded the very best pairs from the beginning especially when he first started and advised others the same. Instead, everyone traded all the pairs and many underperformed and dragged the EA down which lead to very unhappy clients. Since then, this major update, he tweaked the pairs and now only the best of best pairs are traded so now anyone can load it on auto mode and do well with it. At the time of writing this, you can see since he switched to the new update with only best of best pairs and other modifications, he is now up 5% and the account stopped losing money. I see another review made by Torsten saying Levi gives no insight to the logic. He clearly explains it in his youtube video and how it waits for an overextension for a reversion. He even explains how it manages the trade to avoid risk. Torsten says it risks way too much, but not really. The EA will, if in drawdown, get out at a pullback around breakeven for a minimal lose. It is very intelligent and rather safe. I think the system is still worth $1600. It's a shame things went the way they did initially and he really should have stuck with the 5 best pairs. I don't think he deserves the 2 out of 5 stars. Levi is a great guy and listened to a couple requests I made and quickly rolled out an update for it. He does care about this EA and his customers. Anyway, always make sure you do thorough backtests for any EA and start small and then risk "house" money. After months of using this and already making my money back, I highly recommend this for anyone's portfolio. Thank you Levi! I hope others see the value in this EA like I have.

Promising. I still have confidence in Revert Edge — the entries appear logical, and I trust the algorithm. That said, there’s room for improvement. A few suggestions: - Disable loss exit on market roll-over: This often hurts my trades due to unfavorable spreads. - Strategy risk currently only seems to influences position size: It would be great if it also affected the aggressiveness of the (exit) strategy.

🧠 Revert Edge – Overpriced Blackbox with Underwhelming Results ⚠️

After extensive testing, Revert Edge has proven disappointing in both performance and flexibility. 📉

The risk-to-reward ratio is far too aggressive for most retail trading accounts, leading to a poor trade-off between potential gain and drawdown.

A major concern is the lack of transparency: the EA operates as a blackbox system 🕳️

with little to no insight into the underlying logic. The author avoids giving clear explanations,

forcing users to trust a system they can’t properly evaluate or adjust. ❌🔍

Although the developer claims to be open to feedback and future improvements 🗣️

there is no sign that user input has been taken seriously—updates are rare,

and the core issues remain unaddressed. ⏳

💰 Pricing is another weak point.

The current price tag is significantly inflated relative to what the EA delivers.

At best, its value would be fair at one-third of the current cost. ⚖️

Lastly, the EA lacks the granularity needed for users to fine-tune or self-optimize the strategy.

Instead, you’re left dependent on the author’s decisions—who shows little willingness to evolve the product. 🔒🤷

🚫📊 In short: another overhyped and overpriced EA that doesn’t deliver on its promises. Buyer beware.

👉 Happy to revise this review if the developer begins to seriously consider and implement user feedback. 🛠️

Disappointing so far. Let's see if he can recover from the losses of the last few months

one of the worst ea. if we add how much it costs, it's quite outrageous.

Yes performance has not been great over the last 2 months, but i also am not giving a low 1 or 2 star review as you need to look at a system over along period of time and over 100s of trades, every EA or strategy will have losing streaks, markets have been trending hence this type of strat does not work as well, Im sure next 3-5 months it will make new equity highs again when market tends to take Liquidity from key highs and lows and reverse. If it was able to handle the trends better (like know when its trending to stay out of the market better etc) I would have given it 5 stars so yes I agree the losing streaks are longer than I would like but I also believe this is still one of the better EAs out there

After updating to 2.0 version , backtesting result does not meet the real .

Most positions are negative after entry. Of course I understand that there are some negative months, but at the moment our account balance is decreasing. I will take a closer look and if it becomes positive, I will revise my assessment.

In the live signal, some of the trades were made manually and symbols were traded that do not exist at all and were not in the advisor parameters. A large profit was made in a short period of time, and the rest of the time there are no profits. I do not recommend buying yet. I continue testing.

El usuario no ha dejado ningún comentario para su valoración