MilanoBTC

sto affittando Milano e mi trovo bene, bisogna settare bene ! ho inserito 5 posizioni e in un altro conto 10 posizioni simultaneamente e mi da profitti ogni 2 giorni circa perchè mantiene posizioni aperte anche per giorni !!grazie

After 1 week of using the EA made not one trade. Backtest results are trained until 15.07.2025 and after that date the real results are shown. In the last 3 months the account balance goes only up and down and up and down. No real earnings are generated. You should read the ratings of the merchants other EAs and you will see fast, that all of his EAs are Scam . Screenshot in the comment section.

The EA has shown consistent back-test results across multiple brokers and has performed well so far on the seller’s demo account. Some of the negative reviews don’t seem to be well thought out too. One reviewer complains that the EA doesn't take as many trades live as it does in the back-test on average each month, while another calls it a "scam" simply because the EA didn’t take a specific trade that appeared in the back-test. By definition, live results will differ from back-tests, this is normal and expected. It’s also possible that the EA hasn’t identified BTCUSD as being in a strong trend yet, which could explain the reduced trade frequency in the current market conditions. Plus, not all brokers provide high-quality historical data. Missing or inaccurate ticks in back-test data can easily cause discrepancies when comparing to live trading, especially with strategies where small price differences can determine whether a signal is triggered or not. Honestly, I find these reviews a bit exaggerated - it’s like saying, “The EA didn’t trade much over a short period of time or doesn't profit all the time, so it must be bad.” That kind of reasoning ignores the nature of algorithmic trading and market variability. Kinda feel bad for the developer lol ;) I've bought similar EA's before, and they can work long-term and as shown in the back-test if the risk to reward ratio is good. These 'AI' EA's have a high win-rate, the problem is if there's a huge stop-loss and small take-profit one losing trade could blow the account, or if it isn't stress-tested (assuming the developer used out of sample data and walk forward optimization). I bought another "AI" EA with a good risk to reward ratio and its performing well so far, and seem other's perform well in live signals. Even if the edge diminishes over time, as long as the risk-to-reward ratio remains around 1:1 and the win rate stays above 50%, the strategy should continue to perform well.

.

I’ve noticed significant improvements in the EA with each new version. The updates show that the developer is actively working on optimization and performance stability.

It’s clear that a lot of effort is being put into refining the strategy and improving overall results. I appreciate the continuous development and responsiveness.

Keep up the great work and continue improving — it’s definitely moving in the right direction.

---