FXHedge Pro
30 USD
Descargado demo:
14
Publicado:
19 enero 2024
Versión actual:
3.0
¿No ha encontrado el robot adecuado?
Encargue el suyo
en la bolsa Freelance.
Pasar a la bolsa
Encargue el suyo
en la bolsa Freelance.
Cómo comprar un robot comercial o indicador
Inicia el robot en el
hosting virtual
hosting virtual
Pruebe un indicador/robot comercial antes de comprarlo
¿Quieres ganar en el Market?
Cómo ofrecer un producto para que lo compren
Está perdiendo oportunidades comerciales:
- Aplicaciones de trading gratuitas
- 8 000+ señales para copiar
- Noticias económicas para analizar los mercados financieros
Registro
Entrada
Usted acepta la política del sitio web y las condiciones de uso
Si no tiene cuenta de usuario, regístrese
hallo,es funktoiniert nicht.wollte testen aber hat nicht geklappt
Welche Probleme treten auf? Werden keine Trades platziert? Haben Sie es im GBPUSD M5-Zeitrahmen?
If the Lot Type is dynamic, no position will be opened, but the static type will work
If the Lot Type is dynamic, no position will be opened, but the static type will work
Попробуйте использовать меньший размер лота/фактор риска. Или увеличение размера счета/кредитного плеча. Размер позиции слишком велик для учетной записи, что приводит к этой ошибке.
Excellent hedging EA. Am I able to use it to manage my manual trades?
Thank you, this current version will not manage manual trades. I have an EA releasing soon which has a trade panel to manage your manual trades with many more settings / filters.
This may be due to your account balance being too small. Please try with a larger account balance.
When testing with XM broker, it does not work like a your backtest and large drawdowns occur multiple times within a year.
Is this a problem with my broker? I have selected GBPUSD,M5.
When testing with XM broker, it does not work like a your backtest and large drawdowns occur multiple times within a year.
Is this a problem with my broker? I have selected GBPUSD,M5.
The author didn't do a proper back test. He's showing 99% modeling quality when it should say "100% based on real ricks". Not Just 100%, but 100% based on real ticks.
MetaTrader has two settings, one is "tick data" and the other is "tick data based on real ticks". The former is made up ticks, the latter is from actual market data.
A simple write up can be found at: Tick Data Explained (optsets.com) or The Algorithm of Ticks' Generation within the Strategy Tester of the MetaTrader 5 Terminal - MQL5 Articles for a detailed explanation on how it works.
The back test from the author is 100% useless, your test is likely the accurate results.
著者は適切なバックテストを行っていません。著者は「100% 実際のリックに基づく」とすべきところを、99% のモデリング品質を示しています。単に 100% ではなく、100% 実際のティックに基づいています。
MetaTrader には 2 つの設定があります。1 つは「ティック データ」、もう 1 つは「実際のティックに基づくティック データ」です。前者は作られたティックであり、後者は実際の市場データから取得されます。
仕組みの詳細な説明については、 「Tick Data Explained (optsets.com)」または「The Algorithm of Ticks' Generation within the Strategy Tester of the MetaTrader 5 Terminal - MQL5 Articles」の簡単な説明をご覧ください。
著者によるバックテストは 100% 役に立たないので、あなたのテストはおそらく正確な結果です。
親切な回答をありがとう！
What is the minimum balance it can trade with?
I have high quality backtests for 10 years and although I get a very good profit, the float sometimes goes to 26. The only way I have left to control it is to be able to lower the dynamic risk level below 1, and thus try not to exceed 20%.