Silent Exit MT5

SCAM EA: STAY AWAY I purchased "Silent Exit" on Sept. 9th and ran it on standard default settings as advised. After two weeks on a live account, 7 out of 8 trades were heavy losses. While drawdowns happen in trading, the core execution issues and developer behavior are highly concerning: Inconsistent Execution: I ran backtests for the exact same period using my broker’s real tick data. My live trades, the backtests, and the developer's official Signal showed zero overlap. All three executed entirely different trades on different assets. This strongly suggests the backtest results are heavily overfitted and do not represent actual live logic. Suspicious Signal Behavior: The developer’s official Signal showed bizarre pattern anomalies—random $1,000 profit spikes mixed with tiny penny losses and wins. Shortly after I pointed out these inconsistencies and asked about them, the provider responded with "also my signal is running with safety input false" which makes no sense like all other responses. Most troubling is though that he completely disabled/removed the Signal now which is a huge red flag. Stalling Tactics: The developer repeatedly changed explanations—first claiming a "rare broker bug," then blaming my setup, and eventually just asking me to be patient for "something good" telling me zero time horizon for his apparent update that would fix the issue. Despite giving plenty of time (weeks) to address these critical issues, no actual fix or reasonable explanation was provided. Incentivized 5-Star Reviews: A quick look at the positive feedback reveals that almost no one has actually tested the EA live, except the ones that gave negative feedback. Most positive reviews consist of quick praise like "looks promising" or "haven't done forward test yet", which are clearly posted to claim the developer's offered "gift EA" rather than reflect real performance. In my view, the marketed backtests do not reflect reality and are engineered to look good, and the product fails to deliver as advertised and does random stuff. I only expect the EA to do what the backtest shows - and it does not. The developer is friendly, but that is the only positive thing I can say. If he ever actually fixes the issue with an update, I am happy to revoke my statement here but it is, in my opinion, a clear scam. Stay away.

I'm testing this EA with default settings. It's running on a demo account on a VPS. Current results: 2 Wins / 9 Losses (Win Rate: 18.2%) Profit Factor: 0.21 Since the number of trades is still small, I'm temporarily leaving 2 stars and will monitor it a bit longer before updating my rating.

バックテストの結果より、9月8日に購入し、実運用を少Lotで期待値が高い通貨のみで開始しました。結果は1勝4敗と大敗中です。1か月ぐらいは運用してみたいです。またレビューします。

I purchased this EA and tested it because I wanted to see how it performed in real trading. The backtest results looked good, but the trading frequency is extremely low. My backtest produced only about 400 trades over roughly 2 years and 8 months, and in live use I could wait for days without a single trade. When a trade does occur, the profit/loss target is also very small. For me, this makes the EA impractical. I did not expect huge profits from a small account, but I did expect enough trading activity to make running an EA worthwhile. Leaving a computer or VPS running for days waiting for an occasional small trade simply does not make sense to me. I stopped using it. The EA may suit someone who wants extremely infrequent trading, but buyers should understand the trading frequency before purchasing.

Bot loosing money, also, yesterday this bot opened a position of almost 7 lots, even if risks has been applied. lost a lot of money. signal has been deleted. so.. yeah... think for yourself

The backtest looks very good, but the live results aren't as reliable.

The description raises some serious concerns for me. The EA claims to use “Volume Acceleration” to detect rapid shifts in volume before breakouts, but in the spot Forex market there is no centralized real trading volume. Most MT5 brokers only provide tick volume, which is broker-dependent and does not represent the actual traded volume of the Forex market.

Because of this, I am skeptical about how this strategy is really supposed to work and whether the impressive backtest results are reproducible in live trading. The backtest looks extremely good, but the underlying logic is not fully convincing to me. It makes me wonder whether the strategy may be heavily optimized for historical data or whether the backtest settings/data could make the results look much better than what can realistically be achieved live.

I would strongly recommend checking long-term verified live results before trusting the backtest.

**Disappointing Results After 2 Weeks** Unfortunately, after approximately two weeks since purchasing **Silent Exit**, I decided to disable it on my real account. The EA executes trades normally; however, so far, the losses have been slightly larger than the profits. The overall result is negative and, in practice, the performance has been close to break-even. This means that the capital remains invested and exposed to the market without generating enough return to justify continuing to use the EA on a real account at this time. I have also been following the **$100,000 real account** presented as a reference. After my own experience, I have some doubts about how accurately this account represents the results that a buyer can realistically expect to achieve. For me, it is important that the results presented are reasonably consistent with what customers are able to reproduce after purchasing the EA. I will continue to follow future updates and plan to keep the EA running on a **demo account** to see whether its performance improves before considering using it again on a real account. As an additional observation, I also purchased another EA from the same developer, **Iron Stops**, and unfortunately I also had to disable it because the results I obtained did not match the expectations created by the backtests. This review reflects only my personal experience so far. If future updates improve the results, I will be happy to update my review accordingly.

Backtest results have been quite impressive, showing strong and consistent performance over the tested period. I’m now running this EA live to evaluate its real-market performance and consistency under actual trading conditions.

This is my second EA from the developer. The EA looks promising

Пользователь не оставил комментарий к оценке

I wanted to build a portfolio with a different currency pair from Iron Stops, so I ran backtests on various EAs. In the end, I still came back to this one. I haven’t done a forward test yet, but considering how Iron Stops performs, I believe it will deliver results very close to the backtest. The support is sincere, and I feel the developer is someone I can trust.

So far looks good as usual from this developer. Will update if live results are not matching backtest, but I'm sure that will not be the case based on Iron Stops experience

This ea strategy is based on iron stops and seems to work very well! Thank you Fajar i hope you release more good ea's like this soon

"I feel like this EA has a lot of potential!"

Still needs testing in live account, but the EA looks promising for diversification. The developer is quite responsive and answers any question. I will update the review as I test. Let's do it!