BB Return mt5

This EA should be called BE returns because all it does is take a wrong trade against trend and then hits SL . The next trade it recovers the loss with double the risk. This time it makes it correct...interestingly. I dont know why it cant get it correct the first time...The author keeps asking for a positive review and he lures with a BB Opti gift if i give a positive review. I think review should be honest opinion not in lieu of some gift.

The backtest has nothing to do with the reality, only to impress...In live account the EA keeps on having constant drawdown.Even when it enters recovery mode, it can not recover the losses. I regret the $800 I paid for this EA reading the reviews.Don't do it. Do your due diligence and decide responsibly.

Difficult to evaluate after just a few days. Backtests looked promising. Bought it and put it on simulation account, because in my experience 650US$ are easily lost and then I'd be set back already 1300 US$ with this purchase and my account is just 5000US$. So, I am glad I put it on simulation because already the first trade hit SL sunday night open with this opening gap. It entered recovery mode but only recovered about half of the loss. So, it means, in 4 days just 2 trades with win rate 50%. That sounds bad, certainly it is not exciting, but is not yet proof that it doesn't work. I will let it run on SIM now until it reaches some kind of profit, if it does ... and then consider to switch to LIVE.

In one word - Scam , Do not touch. I dont know how it has so many "good" reviews it has to be fake for some kind of benefit , the reviews are fake the backtest (that had no sl for the whole 2025) hit 5 times sl in one month on the last month is fake , Read the comments section . The author will say its not fake "the market has changed" or "its a volatile market now" but no even 1 sl in whole 2025 and its not manipulated ... come on .. its drained 17% of my account . You can watch my results on the comments : https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/162150/comments/page8#comment_59814871

I think Leonid has done a very good job with his EA. The reason I have decided to buy his product was the safety of the strategy. Even though the SL is 3 times bigger compared to the TP the accuracy of the EA still makes it a safe EA. Yesterday was my first day with the EA and lucky I missed the early morning trade ;) however I had the robot ON on the second successful trade. I am very positive about this EA and looking forward to allocate some reasonable capital to it. Currently running it with fixed risk and 0.03 lot but planning to increase as my confidence grows. Also I wouldn't be worried much about the loss yesterday even the back test results clearly show that a loosing trade does happen every couple of months which is normal. Let's not forget we are in a very volatile market year. 4-5 loosing trades per year should be acceptable.

The live account and backtesting follow a similar pattern. It looks reliable.

я более 20 лет в трейдинге, делал множество покупок на маркете, этот советник мне понравился, я его долго тестировал, теперь я точно знаю как с ним работать чтоб он приносил прибыль и не сливал ваш депозит, если кому то интересно, пишите в личку, однако имейте ввиду эта информация очень ценная!

Hello, I think more experienced traders do not overreact too much to the recent drop, and considering the robot’s specific trading style, I personally would prefer to disable the robot over the weekend. For example, I bought the robot this Sunday, and I definitely was not planning to launch it immediately after purchase, because a gap was very likely. And that is exactly what happened. The same applies during medium or high-impact news events that are expected, such as this Thursday’s Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), or even Tuesday’s Consumer Confidence Index, which can strongly affect the price of gold. During such periods, I believe it is better to disable the robot, provided there are no open positions that it still needs to manage. Looking at the developer’s publicly shared trading results, I do not see any anomalies on the chart. So far, everything appears to be within normal limits. Yes, protection against major news events should definitely be built into the robot’s operation. Possibly disabling it before the weekend as well. That is ultimately for the robot’s developer to decide.

edit : This EA has been nothing but a money-losing system for me. In just one week, it hit 3 martingale stop losses, and more than 50% of my capital was wiped out because of this strategy.

The EA is designed in a very risky way. After one stop loss, it immediately starts using a martingale system by doubling the lot size. For example, trades go from 0.1 lot to 0.2 lot, and the EA keeps trading with higher exposure until recovery happens. The problem is that when losses continue during bad market conditions, recovery becomes nearly impossible. Instead, the account keeps taking larger and larger losses until it eventually blows up.

The developer claims the martingale system is “controlled,” but in reality, the risk is extremely high. This is not proper risk management — it feels more like gambling than professional trading.

What is also interesting is that after I posted my honest review, suddenly more positive reviews started appearing, with people saying “4–5 SLs per year is acceptable.” But my simple question is: is more than 3 stop losses in just 7 days acceptable for any serious trader? After 5–7 SLs in a short period, most accounts would already be close to zero because of the doubled lot exposure.

If people are really making consistent profits from this EA, then they should post verified proof and real trading results in the comments section. I’m waiting to see genuine evidence. Otherwise, please stop misleading new buyers with unrealistic claims.

There are too many misleading or possibly paid positive reviews around this EA. I have already shared my loss screenshots and detailed trading results in the comments section so people can see the real performance before risking their hard-earned money.

I personally use many top EAs and earn well with them. If anyone doubts that, they can ask me directly and I can show my results. But in my opinion, this EA is one of the worst and most dangerous systems I have used.

This EA is junk—plain and simple. The positive reviews only appear because people are lured in with free copies of another EA and asked to leave a review—which is exactly what happened in my case. Here is my review: Loss to Recover: €343; I do not recommend buying this EA. Since I’ve unfortunately already purchased the EA, I’ll do what I usually do in these situations: I’ll wait a year, and if a live signal proves convincing by then, I’ll switch it back on. However, most EAs simply vanish during that time and turn out not to have been worth the money.

I feel that this EA still needs a lot of improvement, especially when it is in recovery mode. The TP is too short and the SL is too large. It hit SL first, then TP (with recovery). It would have needed another TP (with recovery), but instead it went to SL again, and the loss was doubled because the recovery mode doubles the lot size. I do not plan to use it again until it improves.

The backtest looks too perfect and is very misleading, because it should barely have any SLs, or almost never hit them. Having several SLs in a row on LIVE trading makes the backtest look very unreliable.

So, after a little over a week of trading, I would like to offer a brief statement. During this time, I observed 3 trades on the demo account and 2 on the live account. Unfortunately, the demo account caught the losing trade from the afternoon of May 19th—an event that has already been discussed here. Fortunately, the live account was spared from this. To be honest, it is, of course, still far too early to pass a final judgment on the Advisor. Furthermore, I really do not care for statements like "the backtest looks great" at this stage. Once you are aware of all the ways such tests can be manipulated, you stop putting any stock in them whatsoever—whether through hard-coded results within the EA, or by the logic excluding specific days from the test—precisely the days when disaster strikes, and so on. Overall, the strategy appears to be well thought out; and as an absolute fan of the Bollinger Bands indicator (as well as the Stochastic oscillator), I have been interested in the BB_EA right from the start. It was also important to me that I have known the man behind the EA—Leonid—since at least 2023 (albeit only through correspondence); I therefore know that he stands by his products and will readily admit—without beating around the bush—whenever something isn't working quite right. Consequently, I view the future of this EA with optimism and offer a clear recommendation to buy. Ron

Backtested BB Return and the results showed excellent performance, with stable and promising behavior based on its Bollinger Bands return strategy. I also appreciate that it follows a disciplined approach without relying on grid, martingale, or averaging, making it a good EA to monitor further in live trading.

사용자가 평가에 대한 코멘트를 남기지 않았습니다

Waited for the first trade to execute, and it closed in profit. The algorithm is functioning exactly as expected

Excellent EA! I've been using it for 30 days and I'm really enjoying the results; there are several returns for minimal losses, it's definitely worth buying.

The Backtest results are amazing. The Live results too! There aren´t many trades, but when they come, they mostly ending up in profit!

Back tests on multiple trading brokers look great, currently trading as expected, 2 trades, 2 wins and in line with the live accounts that are listed on the account. Will see how it goes!

So far I'm satisfied. I've already had a profitable trade, and the backtests look very good. Think I won't go wrong with this EA.

trust me, this ea is worth buying