BB Return mt5

This EA is great, especially after the latest update. I backtested this with 10 years of data and there was never more than 1 consecutive loss, so making sure 1 trade is enough to recover a loss is a great addition. (of course this gives no guarantees for the future, but it at least looks good if it can survive such a long backtest). I am now running this on a live account and it matches the signal. The creator is also very reactive and answers fast if you have any questions.

After purchase, the EA struggled a bit with a series of unfortunate SLs. However, developer provided and update and ever since, the results have been great!

I have tried it both backtesting and real, results were unbelievably good, then tested it a for a couple of months on a real account. This EA prevailed over the EAs I purchased, the secret in it is how to fully use it, understand the settings, and how to get the most of it.

Great results since the last update! Thanks for the hard work; I hope the PMs gave you a bit of a boost. Long live BB RETURN!

It is difficult to consider this a good strategy. I purchased the account in April and achieved positive results during the initial half-month testing period on a small account; then I put it on a larger capital account, but significant losses incurred. This occurred under the default recovery mode, which requires two consecutive trades to recover a loss and generate some profit. The issue lies precisely here: the recovery mode requires twice the standard lot size. If a second trade still results in a loss, applying the default profit-to-loss Ratio ratio (1:3, less TP & more SL) would lead to a loss equivalent to six times the standard position size—a truly catastrophic outcome. I was forced to disable the recovery mode due to concerns about further losses potentially triggering margin call. After that, the strategy was executed only twice within nearly a month, both resulting in profits; however, these gains were negligible compared to the required recovery of net value, consistent with the real-time signals provided. The author have updated it at the middle of June, and the new version's backtesting performance fell short of the previous version's. However, this isn't the main issue—the backtesting results are merely for reference. Even with such impressive initial results, significant losses still occurred, right? The problem is that the new version has seen far too few trades—no trade since its release. This makes me wonder: am I really buying this strategy just to treat it as a mere mascot? No, our goal is to enter the market and make profits. An EA doesn't trade remains utterly meaningless, no matter how impressive its backtesting results may appear.

Testet for round about 1.5 Month- looks very good:-) Account is in Plus:-)

Nach etwas über einem Monat möchte ich hier meine Erfahrung äussern. Ich habe BB Return mit gemischten Gefühlen gekauft und habe dann mit den Backtests begonnen und wirklich alles Erdenkliche durchgetestet. Ich dachte immer wieder: Das kann nicht sein, zu gut um wahr zu sein. Im Live-Markt hatte ich dann nach einem TP bereits ein SL. Der Recovery Mode machte sein Ding: doppeltes Risiko, und nach 2 TP war sogar wieder etwas Profit da. Das hat nichts mit Martingale zu tun. Man muss einfach mit dem doppelten Risiko umgehen können! Und klar, es ist extrem doof, dass es ende Mai nach einem SL im Recovery Mode nochmals einen SL gab. Das schmerzt natürlich extrem. Aber das ist Trading! Der EA performt sonst sehr gut und meine Ergebnisse passen ziemlich genau aus den Live mit den Backtests überein. Klar, etwas Slippage und Spread-Unterschiede gibt es, aber es ist sehr akkurat! Was mir durchaus ein gutes Gefühl gibt. Und jeder ist für sein Risiko selber verantwortlich, nicht der Developer! Zum Schluss möchte ich noch darauf hinweisen, dass es eine Phase gab, in der der EA auch 2 Verluste im Recovery Mode hintereinander hatte. Schauen wir, was die Zukunft bringt und ob die Wahrscheinlichkeiten aus dem Backtest so weitergehen. Ich werde das kommende Update vom EA vermutlich nicht machen. Ich denke nicht, dass sich der Goldmarkt grob verändert hat. Ich werde hier in ein paar Monaten einen Nachtrag machen und informieren, wie es läuft. P.S.: Ich finde die ganzen negativen Kommentare sehr schade. Man sieht, dass sich diese Leute zu wenig mit diesem EA befasst haben und anhand ihrer Emotionen möglicherweise auch ein zu hohes Risiko eingehen. (Vielleicht sollte auch die Exklusivität vom EA schützen ;) ) Danke, Leonid, für deinen EA.

The product performed well in tests. I recommend it.

사용자가 평가에 대한 코멘트를 남기지 않았습니다

Diese ganzen "Bewertungen schreien nach einer Antwort! Ich habe ein "Risiko per Trade" von 0,5 eingestellt. Dies hat in den letzten 4Tagen zu einem realen verlust von 1,68% Drawdown geführt. Ich denke, das ist angesichts der Marktlage zu vekraften. Ich bin auch weitehin von dem EA überzeugt!

This EA should be called BE (break even) Returns because all it does is take a wrong trade against trend and then hits SL . The next trade it recovers the loss with double the risk. This time it makes it correct...interestingly. I dont know why it cant get it correct the first time...The author keeps asking for a positive review and he lures with a BB Opti gift if i give a positive review. I think review should be honest opinion not in lieu of some gift.

Difficult to evaluate after just a few days. Backtests looked promising. Bought it and put it on simulation account, because in my experience 650US$ are easily lost and then I'd be set back already 1300 US$ with this purchase and my account is just 5000US$. So, I am glad I put it on simulation because already the first trade hit SL sunday night open with this opening gap. It entered recovery mode but only recovered about half of the loss. So, it means, in 4 days just 2 trades with win rate 50%. That sounds bad, certainly it is not exciting, but is not yet proof that it doesn't work. I will let it run on SIM now until it reaches some kind of profit, if it does ... and then consider to switch to LIVE.

In one word - Scam , Do not touch. I dont know how it has so many "good" reviews it has to be fake for some kind of benefit , the reviews are fake the backtest (that had no sl for the whole 2025) hit 5 times sl in one month on the last month is fake , Read the comments section . The author will say its not fake "the market has changed" or "its a volatile market now" but no even 1 sl in whole 2025 and its not manipulated ... come on .. its drained 17% of my account . You can watch my results on the comments : https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/162150/comments/page8#comment_59814871

I think Leonid has done a very good job with his EA. The reason I have decided to buy his product was the safety of the strategy. Even though the SL is 3 times bigger compared to the TP the accuracy of the EA still makes it a safe EA. Yesterday was my first day with the EA and lucky I missed the early morning trade ;) however I had the robot ON on the second successful trade. I am very positive about this EA and looking forward to allocate some reasonable capital to it. Currently running it with fixed risk and 0.03 lot but planning to increase as my confidence grows. Also I wouldn't be worried much about the loss yesterday even the back test results clearly show that a loosing trade does happen every couple of months which is normal. Let's not forget we are in a very volatile market year. 4-5 loosing trades per year should be acceptable.

я более 20 лет в трейдинге, делал множество покупок на маркете, этот советник мне понравился, я его долго тестировал, теперь я точно знаю как с ним работать чтоб он приносил прибыль и не сливал ваш депозит, если кому то интересно, пишите в личку, однако имейте ввиду эта информация очень ценная!

Hello, I think more experienced traders do not overreact too much to the recent drop, and considering the robot’s specific trading style, I personally would prefer to disable the robot over the weekend. For example, I bought the robot this Sunday, and I definitely was not planning to launch it immediately after purchase, because a gap was very likely. And that is exactly what happened. The same applies during medium or high-impact news events that are expected, such as this Thursday’s Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), or even Tuesday’s Consumer Confidence Index, which can strongly affect the price of gold. During such periods, I believe it is better to disable the robot, provided there are no open positions that it still needs to manage. Looking at the developer’s publicly shared trading results, I do not see any anomalies on the chart. So far, everything appears to be within normal limits. Yes, protection against major news events should definitely be built into the robot’s operation. Possibly disabling it before the weekend as well. That is ultimately for the robot’s developer to decide.

I feel that this EA still needs a lot of improvement, especially when it is in recovery mode. The TP is too short and the SL is too large. It hit SL first, then TP (with recovery). It would have needed another TP (with recovery), but instead it went to SL again, and the loss was doubled because the recovery mode doubles the lot size. I do not plan to use it again until it improves.

The backtest looks too perfect and is very misleading, because it should barely have any SLs, or almost never hit them. Having several SLs in a row on LIVE trading makes the backtest look very unreliable.

So, after a little over a week of trading, I would like to offer a brief statement. During this time, I observed 3 trades on the demo account and 2 on the live account. Unfortunately, the demo account caught the losing trade from the afternoon of May 19th—an event that has already been discussed here. Fortunately, the live account was spared from this. To be honest, it is, of course, still far too early to pass a final judgment on the Advisor. Furthermore, I really do not care for statements like "the backtest looks great" at this stage. Once you are aware of all the ways such tests can be manipulated, you stop putting any stock in them whatsoever—whether through hard-coded results within the EA, or by the logic excluding specific days from the test—precisely the days when disaster strikes, and so on. Overall, the strategy appears to be well thought out; and as an absolute fan of the Bollinger Bands indicator (as well as the Stochastic oscillator), I have been interested in the BB_EA right from the start. It was also important to me that I have known the man behind the EA—Leonid—since at least 2023 (albeit only through correspondence); I therefore know that he stands by his products and will readily admit—without beating around the bush—whenever something isn't working quite right. Consequently, I view the future of this EA with optimism and offer a clear recommendation to buy. Ron

Backtested BB Return and the results showed excellent performance, with stable and promising behavior based on its Bollinger Bands return strategy. I also appreciate that it follows a disciplined approach without relying on grid, martingale, or averaging, making it a good EA to monitor further in live trading.

사용자가 평가에 대한 코멘트를 남기지 않았습니다