Interesting and Humour - page 4534
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
How about a link to a film where you can watch it, buy it or something similar?
Unfortunately, I don't remember the title. It's not flashy, it's not a journalistic sensation film. Something on the level of the Kultura channel. I guess you could Google it. It's not relevant to me any more, I've read plenty of confirmation of those facts, and not from bloggers. Although many do not trust scientists either, because couch experts know better. It is only necessary to understand that scientists observe shop rules, and speak only what is generally accepted. That is why one hears "unusual" things from scientists of another department. For example, the non-professional historian Fomenko (a professional non-humanist scientist). I used to go through this vile scholarly environment. I remember with a shudder.
Unfortunately, I don't remember the title. It's not a flamboyant film, it's not a journalistic sensation. Something on the level of the Kultura channel. I guess you could Google it. It is not relevant to me anymore, I have read a lot of confirmations of those facts, and not from bloggers. Although many do not trust scientists either, because sofa experts know better. It is only necessary to understand that scientists observe shop rules, and say only what is generally accepted. That is why one hears "unusual" things from scientists of another department. For example, the non-professional historian Fomenko (a professional non-humanist scientist). I used to go through this vile scholarly environment. I remember with a shudder.
Naturally! Who would have guessed anything different.
The British Royal Library holds the first edition of Encyclopedia Britannica where the map with the Great Tartaria has not yet been withdrawn. And there are scans. Also a fake? Fakes like that won't pass, they're too easy to disprove.
I think you also do not agree that all the real history has been removed by German authors of the "history" of Russia?
At least with the fact that history is written by the victors, would you agree?
A long chewed up myth, it is now unseemly to support this pseudoscience and obscurantism.
The map is of course real, Tartaria is not.
The Europeans at that time traveled little in these regions and simply marked and named it as they could, obviously implying the Turkic-Mongolian peoples, and the ethnic self-name Tartary was Tartar, the Mongols who came into contact with Europeans in the 13th century were called by some chroniclers "Tatars", gradually by the late 13th century this toponym was fixed in official correspondence, nothing special here.
Well and to finish this Tartarya: if it was a mighty ancient state why any coins of this state have not been found? There are coins from the Mongol Empire, the Golden Horde, but no Tartary coins. Oops.
So that's it. Arguments like "some granny told me somewhere" are no big deal.
Incidentally, archaeological excavations are finding exactly the same artefacts in the British Isles and in India. Boats, weapons, jewellery, for example, peculiar to the Scythians.
The Irish wrote that the Celts had lingam sanctuaries in their pagan temples, smeared with honey, milk, as in India. And to this day in villages women still do it secretly.
Phallic cults were spread throughout all regions, the Mediterranean, Europe, the Middle East, so it's not surprising that there are similarities. If we talk about the Celts and Germans, they had images with large phalluses, which, by the way, is also a symbol of weapons warrior besides the obvious cult of fertility and vitality, but to say that it is lingam is incorrect. For example in Japan and even in Mesoamerica they have their phalluses too, and how did the pre-Columbian Indians know about the Indian lingams? Therefore one should not speak about "identical" artefacts, they may be similar, but similarity does not necessarily mean genetic connection. Now would be surprised that blades or any other objects have similarities. A culture can evolve in parallel ways, repeating archetypes. For example mythical dragons are found in almost all cultures, but this does not necessarily mean that they are directly related to each other.
Long chewed up myth, it is now unseemly to support this pseudoscience and obscurantism.
The map is of course real, Tartarya is not.
The Europeans at that time traveled little in those regions and simply marked and named them as they could, obviously implying the Turkic-Mongolian peoples, and the ethnical self-name Tartary was derived from the Tartar name, the Mongols who came into contact with Europeans in the 13th century were called "Tatars" by some chroniclers, gradually by the late 13th century this toponym was fixed in official correspondence, nothing special here.
Well and to finish this Tartarya: if it was a mighty ancient state why any coins of this state have not been found? There are coins from the Mongol Empire, the Golden Horde, but no Tartary coins. Oops.
1. Who chewed up the myth? I follow the topic, and have seen nothing but derision of alternative historians by couch experts and pundits who completely ignore inconvenient facts. Yes, the facts are inconvenient, because there are almost no documents left, but they do not fit in with the official history.
2. I did not say that Tartarya was a state in the place of Russia. I cited it in response to Tartary being a fiction. I agree that Tartarya, Gardarika and Scythia are both names for our country (not a state) by different peoples, explorer travellers, at different times - as you like. Why should there be coins with the inscription Great Tartary, if even each city had its own?
3. The words Tartary and Tartars have nothing in common. The ethnic self-name Tartars did not exist at all. That is how the Slavs called all foreign enemies, whether steppe or Lithuanian.
1. Ke
The phallic cults were widespread in all regions, in the Mediterranean, in Europe, in the Middle East, so it is not surprising that the similarities are found. If we talk about the Celts and Germans, they had images with large phalluses, which, by the way, is also a symbol of weapons warrior besides the obvious cult of fertility and vitality, but to say that it is lingam is incorrect. For example in Japan and even in Mesoamerica they have their phalluses too, and how did the pre-Columbian Indians know about the Indian lingams? Therefore one should not speak about "similar" artefacts, they may be similar, but similarity does not necessarily mean genetic connection. Now would be surprised that blades or any other objects have similarities. A culture can evolve in parallel ways, repeating archetypes. For example mythical dragons are in almost all cultures, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're directly related to each other.
So why draw a phallic cult in all its diversity, where everything can be drawn. I'm talking about a completely coincidental cult of the lingam, a pillar of the same size and shape, equally decorated with flowers, smeared with honey, sprinkled with milk. It's very specific. Coincidence, yeah. Religion equally developed in opposite hemispheres and different cultures?
The USSR is also the name of our country
I did not say countries (not states) for nothing. The USSR is not another country after all. Unless you have territorial losses in mind.