
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Not exactly emotion. I have learned the most difficult thing - not to trade.
By the way, according to the rules, the robot had to be submitted to MQ 10 days before the Championship, i.e. by September 20.
I sent the debugged and customized version a few hours before the deadline, I was fine-tuning and optimizing the next version, but I didn't have time,
but I didn't have time to upload it, literally a day was not enough.
When I ran it on real data after the championship, I've found out that it has reached over 60k and would be the second in 2007 :)
My first robot was a betting trader with cosmic profitability and it raised 160k for 3 months from 10k. And the second place was taken by the American expert wakena who got 50k.
Mine was on divergence + very good fitting + lucky with the trend, I got only 6 in the world.
I sharpened the bias to buy, at sharp sales the robot kept trades longer, at purchases shorter.
I've already shown you the result of a robot that has been trading for three years without any changes. There is no super yield, but it can work.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/387540/page5#comment_27381923
Yuri, who won there again?
in 2007, Batter, a guy from the Ukraine.
neural network from 10k to 160
There was a big interest in neural networks back then.
I communicated with him once by mail and in person at MQL.
He had been dealing with neural networks for 10 years before that. By the way, his neural network was leaked in 2008 :) too.
I felt sorry for putting a decent period of my life into studying neural networks :)
I have already shown the result of a robot that has been trading for 3 years without change. No super returns, but it can do something.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/387540/page5#comment_27381923
And the trend is not set ?
and the trend is not set?
No. And there is also a complete symmetry of conditions for long and short. It is only since 3.22 that I started to move away from symmetry and combine it.
Moreover, the same robot with exactly the same settings trades not only RTS, but also MIX (more or less successfully) and Si (not so successfully).
No. And in this one there is a complete symmetry of conditions for long and short. It is only since 3.22 that I started to move away from symmetry and combine it.
Moreover, the same robot with exactly the same settings trades not only RTS, but also MIX (more or less successfully) and Si (not so successfully).
It is really interesting!
I even started another threadhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/388746
No. And in this one there is a complete symmetry of conditions for long and short. It is only since 3.22 that I started to move away from symmetry and combine it.
Moreover, this same robot with exactly the same settings trades not only RTS, but also MIX (more or less successfully) and Si (not so successfully).
Reminds me of our favourite, Maxim's, how much was thrown at him)
networks, clearly not in these years.