Interesting and Humour - page 1066
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Eh Shaitana ma
Well, why three... the solution and the answer are correct.
the solution is wrong
first the items 2 and then the number of consumers 9
Well, why the three... the solution and the answer are right.
Well, why a C... the solution and the answer are correct.
-- the solution is wrong because the sequence is broken
-- the answer is correct, but the solution is wrong
a grade of 3 is valid.
-- the solution is wrong because the sequence is broken
-- the answer is correct, but the solution is wrong
a grade of 3 is valid.
The little man doesn't know the rule about changing places and so on, but he knows intuitively that he's got it right.
But no, he needs to be brainwashed and forced to act according to all the rules of once invented dogma.
A land of unscared dogmatic idiots.
The little man does not yet know the rule of changing places, etc., but intuitively knows that he has done everything right.
But no, he needs to be brainwashed and forced to act according to all the rules of once invented dogmas.
A country of unscared dogmatic idiots.
in this case - dogma, dogmatists, country, idiots - don't mix it all up.
if a pupil writes "18 (l)" in brackets, it means that they have learned the topic that "litres" comes first and then "amount" - it is not a dogma, but a rule.
The student must understand "what" to multiply and "what" to multiply by - they must be able to distinguish between a "multiplier" and a "multiplier" (even the terms are different).
and the task is not about knowing the multiplication table, but about a different category.
Every lesson has its own aims and tasks, what pupils should know and be able to do, and assessment criteria.
That is why the teacher gave a "3" and not a "2" - the teacher did the right thing (unlike their parents who, without understanding the subject, confuse the child and make the child doubt the teacher's authority).
Mischek:
the solution is wrong.
first the items 2 and then the number of consumers 9
Why does the sequence "first the items and then the number of consumers" matter?
And why does it matter in the sequence "items first, then the number of consumers" ?