Do you like the article?
Share it with others -

Use new possibilities of MetaTrader 5

# How to Develop a Profitable Trading Strategy

16 September 2015, 16:40
10
41 693

### Introduction

The process of developing successful trading strategies with implementation of technical analysis can be divided into several stages:
1. Attach several technical indicators to a chart window of a financial instrument's price, and identify patterns of market correlations and signal indicators.
2. Formulate data obtained from the previous correlation step.
3. Convert strategy to a relevant programming language to create a mechanical trading system.
4. Run the trading system through a simulator based on history data and try to match its input parameters (optimize).
5. If the previous step hasn't increased the balance, proceed to step 1.
6. Run the system obtained through the previous stages on demo accounts for testing.
7. If the previous step hasn't brought any profit from virtual money, proceed to step 1.
8. Use the system in real-life trading, occasionally adjusting its input parameters to the changing market conditions.
That's it, really. The system created this way can be used in automated trading, as well as an advisor in manual trading in order to suggest the most important signals sent by technical indicators.

Let's see what happens, if we try to computerize the whole process.

This article analyzes the use of a simple single-layer neural network for identifying the future price movements based on the readings of the Acceleration/Deceleration (AC) Oscillator.

### Neural Network

What is a neural network or Perceptron? This is an algorithm that uses a linear filter to add an object to a particular class or, on the contrary, to exclude it from the same object class. This is how the inequation looks like:

w1 * a1 + w2 * a2 + ... wn * an > d,

where:

wi - weighting coefficient with index i,

ai - numerical value of a sign with object's index i,

d - threshold value that often equals 0.

If the left side of the inequation appears to be higher than the threshold value, then the object belongs to a specific class, if it is lower, the same does not apply. In case when the object classification implies a separation into two classes, a single-layer neural network is sufficient.

It may seem that the inequation used in a neural network is somehow similar to a "shamanic spell" in regards to weighting factors. In reality, this is not the case. The principle of neural network operation has a geometric meaning.

In fact, a plane is described geometrically as a linear equation. For example, in a three-dimensional space the plane equation concerning the coordinates X, Y and Z is the following:

A * X + B * Y + C * Z + D = 0

The coordinates of all points located on one side of the plane in this space satisfy the inequation:

A * X + B * Y + C * Z + D > 0

And coordinates of all points positioned on the other side of the plane satisfy the inequation:

A * X + B * Y + C * Z + D < 0

Thus, if a plane equation and any points coordinates are known to us, we can divide a set of all points in space into two sets of points separated by this plane.

Respectively, weighting coefficients in a neural network inequation are constants that define a certain plane equation in the multidimensional space of objects' signs. By means of inequation we can accurately determine, whether these objects lie on one or the other side of the specified plane. For this purpose it is sufficient to locate the objects' coordinates and, by substituting them in the equation of the plane, compare with zero.

### Problem Definition

If we divide objects into two classes, such as open long positions and short positions, and use indicators' or oscillators' values of technical analysis as signs, we will only require to find a plane equation and use it for identification purposes. The problem definition is clear.

However, there is one issue with neural networks. Let's take a two-dimensional space of signs described by coordinates X and Y. We will use this space to place objects with coordinates of points.

The figure above shows that if a set of points in red color do not intersect a set of coordinate points marked blue, then both sets can be separated using lines (a line is a separator in two-dimensional space, and a plane - in three or more dimensional space). Please note that the equations for these dividing lines may vary. Another example now:

We can see that the sets of points are intersected in space and it isn't possible to draw a clear dividing line between them. The only viable solution would be to draw a line that would separate two sets of points, so that the majority of red objects stay on one side, and the blue objects - on the other side. This time, we are dealing with an optimization issue, i.e. a search for an equation dividing a plane or line, able to have a maximum separation between two objects' classes, but with probability that some points' membership to a class will be mistakenly identified as a membership to another class.

There are other ways to implement neural networks, namely, via nonlinear filters and multilayer networks. Nonlinear filters allow using a higher-order dividing surface as a boundary layer separation between objects of different classes. Multilayer networks imply using multiple filters (separating planes or surfaces) for identifying objects that belong to three or more classes.

Let's try to define a problem that we will have to solve. Basic information a trader should know to achieve profitable trading results is a direction of the price changes. If a price goes up, a trader should open a long position. If it goes down, a trader should open a short position. Therefore, we already have two classes of objects, namely, the directions of price movements. In order to make a decision, following the technical analysis, traders refer to a study of the so-called technical indicators and oscillators. We will also analyze the oscillator named AC.

Since technical oscillators are histograms whose values deviate from a horizontal line, then, respectively, we will require a neural network with a line filter. We will be using patterns as signs of an object, i.e. the oscillator's values at four points taken in seven period steps back in history, starting from the current moment.

The value of the oscillator is marked with a circle in the figure above. We will identify them as a1, a2, a3 and a4, and put in the separation plane's equation to compare the obtained value with zero in order to find out from which side the pattern will show.

It only remains now to get the plane equation, which will separate the patterns preceding upward price movement from the patterns preceding downward price movement.

For this purpose we will use the genetic algorithm built in MetaTrader 4 and intended for speeding up the optimization processes. In other words, we will select the values ​​of linear filter weighting coefficients in a such way, that consequently will allow us to obtain the dividing line equation for the maximum balance, using the optimization strategies based on history data.

For this purpose we need, at least, a formulation of the trading strategy, in order to implement the algorithm and to convert it to the Expert Advisor code for MetaTrader 4.

In theory, a trading system should provide signals for both market entry and exit. However, the output signals are optional and can be avoided under the following conditions:
1. Placing take profit and stop loss orders;
2. Turning in the opposite direction upon a receipt of a signal indicating a change of direction in the market trend.
To avoid complicating the trading system, we will use the outputs for the protective stops - stop loss and reversal signals. In this case, the neural network will receive only two output signals for objects' sign values, namely:
• Prices are likely to move upwards;
• Prices are likely to move downwards.
This simplifies the task of identifying objects for neural networks by dividing all of them into two classes. The trading system's optimization process can also be simplified by eliminating the control of profit-taking orders (take profit), i.e. avoiding to select another input parameter. In this case, it is sufficient to use trailing stop orders for gradually placing stop-loss towards the profitable side, until the point the neural network sends an opposite signal or makes a mistake. Any error of the neural network will trigger the protective stop. Furthermore, the order management system becomes complicated. Quick position reversal to an opposite direction is best implemented using a counter order with a double lot and a subsequent closing of a counter position. This maneuver enables to perform all reversal operations immediately, as soon as the neural network receives the signal.

To reduce the number of false neural network signals, we will read and make decisions based only on formed bars and opening prices of the same bars.

### Problem Solution

```//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//|                                       ArtificialIntelligence.mq4 |
//|                               Copyright й 2006, Yury V. Reshetov |
//|                                         http://reshetov.xnet.uz/ |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//---- input parameters
extern int    x1 = 120;
extern int    x2 = 172;
extern int    x3 = 39;
extern int    x4 = 172;
// StopLoss level
extern double sl = 50;
extern double lots = 0.1;
extern int    MagicNumber = 888;
static int prevtime = 0;
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| expert initialization function                                   |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
int init()
{
//----
return(0);
}
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| expert deinitialization function                                 |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
int deinit()
{
//----
return(0);
}
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| expert start function                                            |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
int start()
{
if(Time[0] == prevtime)
return(0);
prevtime = Time[0];
//----
{
}
else
{
prevtime = Time[1];
return(0);
}
int ticket = -1;
// check for opened position
int total = OrdersTotal();
for(int i = 0; i < total; i++)
{
// check for symbol & magic number
if(OrderSymbol() == Symbol() && OrderMagicNumber() == MagicNumber)
{
int prevticket = OrderTicket();
// long position is opened
{
// check profit
if(Bid > (OrderStopLoss() + (sl * 2  + spread) * Point))
{
if(perceptron() < 0)
{
// reverse
ticket = OrderSend(Symbol(), OP_SELL, lots * 2, Bid, 3,
Ask + sl * Point, 0, "AI", MagicNumber,
0, Red);
Sleep(30000);
if(ticket < 0)
{
prevtime = Time[1];
}
else
{
OrderCloseBy(ticket, prevticket, Blue);
}
}
else
{
// trailing stop
if(!OrderModify(OrderTicket(), OrderOpenPrice(),
Bid - sl * Point, 0, 0, Blue))
{
Sleep(30000);
prevtime = Time[1];
}
}
}
// short position is opened
}
else
{
// check profit
{
if(perceptron() > 0)
{
// reverse
Bid - sl * Point, 0, "AI", MagicNumber,
0, Blue);
Sleep(30000);
if(ticket < 0)
{
prevtime = Time[1];
}
else
{
OrderCloseBy(ticket, prevticket, Blue);
}
}
else
{
// trailing stop
if(!OrderModify(OrderTicket(), OrderOpenPrice(),
Ask + sl * Point, 0, 0, Blue))
{
Sleep(30000);
prevtime = Time[1];
}
}
}
}
// exit
return(0);
}
}
// check for long or short position possibility
if(perceptron() > 0)
{
//long
ticket = OrderSend(Symbol(), OP_BUY, lots, Ask, 3, Bid - sl * Point, 0,
"AI", MagicNumber, 0, Blue);
if(ticket < 0)
{
Sleep(30000);
prevtime = Time[1];
}
}
else
{
// short
ticket = OrderSend(Symbol(), OP_SELL, lots, Bid, 3, Ask + sl * Point, 0,
"AI", MagicNumber, 0, Red);
if(ticket < 0)
{
Sleep(30000);
prevtime = Time[1];
}
}
//--- exit
return(0);
}
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//|  The PERCEPRRON - a perceiving and recognizing function          |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
double perceptron()
{
double w1 = x1 - 100.0;
double w2 = x2 - 100.0;
double w3 = x3 - 100.0;
double w4 = x4 - 100.0;
double a1 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 0);
double a2 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 7);
double a3 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 14);
double a4 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 21);
return (w1 * a1 + w2 * a2 + w3 * a3 + w4 * a4);
}
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
```

Now we simply have to select the weighting coefficients of the parting plane linear equation for a neural network. Let's run a strategy tester by pressing the keys Ctrl + R:

In Settings tab we select a fast method emulation market model only for opening prices (signals in our EA are read based on the formed bars). We tick ​​the Recalculate and Optimization, and then click Expert properties.

Testing tab:

We choose the initial deposit of \$3,000, the optimization and testing will be carried out based on long and short positions. The main optimization index will be considered as the maximum balance during the test period. Also, a genetic algorithm should be included in order to speed up the optimization process.

Inputs tab:

We will tick ​​the input parameters selected by a genetic algorithm: x1, x2, x3 and x4 for the neural network weighting factors, also we will need to choose the acceptable value sl - stop loss level. Number of lots will be taken as 1 and a magic number will remain by default.

Optimization tab:

To speed up the optimization process, the maximum drawdown will be set up at the level of 35%. To clarify the acceptable level of a maximum drawdown it is necessary, first, to start the optimization process without any restrictions. Only after the first optimization results are obtained, it is required to take its value, round it up, and, after stopping the process, to enter the trading limits. The restarted optimization process will run considerably faster.

Click OK to close the Expert settings tab. Now we can start the optimization process by pressing the Start button. It is also advisable to disable the output for useless results:

During the process of optimization it is advisable to clear all journals occasionally, if a computer is weak and has a small RAM.

On Pentium III the entire optimization process takes slightly over an hour. The time depends on the financial instrument.

All is left to do is to click the right button located on the top line and, by selecting Set Input Parameters from the pop-up menu, begin testing on history data.

There is no doubt, that the test results will match data issued by the optimizer.

We would like to publish these results here. However, anyone in doubt can make a claim, that the information could be simply tailored to the history data. And how will the obtained strategy behave in case of the market change? How relevant are the patterns obtained for the last periods in the future? Take, for example, the participation in the automated trading championship, where rules prohibit to make any amendments to the input parameters until the championship is over.

Let's try and make an experiment. To do this, the neural network will be trained on history data, taken as a representative sample, but will exclude the past three months data. For this purpose we will use a limitation of optimization period and testing by dates functions integrated in the tester.

Let's start the process of optimization. We will obtain the results for the input parameters: x1 = 146, x2 = 25, x3 = 154, x4 = 121, sl = 45.

Now we shall check the obtained strategy for the period it hasn't been optimized and could not make any assumptions, that is, three months after the optimization period. We need to simply untick "Use date" and see how the strategy will proceed trading:

The result speaks for itself. The strategy eventually gave profit. Certainly, in comparison to the profit observed on the actual championship, the income earned was quite modest. We should bear in mind though, that the capital and risk management is not performed by EA, as it only provides positions with a fixed amount of lots. Furthermore, the over-optimization should be carried out in real trading, way more often than once every three months.

### Conclusion

How shall we treat the conclusions regarding neural networks made by D. Katz and D. McCormick in their book "The Encyclopedia of Trading Strategies"?

Firstly, operate by following the principle: trust, but verify. The so-called activities of D. Katz and D. McCormick are built in a way to avoid the possibility of this test. In other words, this is an unscientific approach that excludes reproduction. It is understandable when some people are involved in publishing business, rather than trading. Their task is to successfully sell the manuscript, without depending much on its content. To make sense out of this, it is sufficient to understand, what path they were going to create all the scrap paper written in style "500 useless advice" interspersed with figures. Let's try to sort things out.

• The problem definition by D. Katz and D. McCormick was to create a non-existent indicator or, to be more precise, a time-reversed slow %K stochastic, which, in fact, acts as a time machine and takes information from 10 bars ahead and based on it provides readings for 10 bars all the way backwards. If I had this indicator, Bill Gates and George Soros would be highly unlikely to compete with me;
• The next step was to take some data and using the telepathic abilities to obtain the stochastic predictions. They have already set the approximation task, that is, knowing the function arguments, to obtain its value. Approximation is, in fact, the adaptation, which Katz and McCormick so pointedly argue on the pages of their manuscript;
• It does not matter as much how the approximation was obtained, as it is more important that neural networks are not suitable for this goal. It would be much easier to complete the same task, for example, through a spectral analysis;
• Neural networks are acting even worse with interpolation and extrapolation tasks, and if we take data from a representative sample, then the extrapolation, rather than a membership to a certain class, applies;
• Having some kind of telepathic stochastic approximation which realization included obvious errors, Katz and McCormick went further and based on the readings of this erroneous device created a "trading strategy", which also had to interpret the readings of a faulty device, namely, if %K surpasses certain limits, then it is likely that the prices have reached maximum or minimum values. After all this "tinsel" was stuck in a mechanical trading system and, having received its statistics and hasty conclusions, the authors proposed to introduce them to their readers.
The results were instant. In representative samples there was a certain progress, however, outside this group the opportunity to make profit was limited and only losses were reported.

However, it wasn't just Katz and McCormick who failed the experiments linked to neural networks. The first neural network project called "Perceptron" also did not justify hopes that were pinned on it. It is the first step that costs troublesome, which is exactly what happened with Frankenstein. Later objective analysis about the capabilities and disabilities of a neural network, was conducted by M. Minsky and S. Papert [1]. Therefore, before proceeding to finding a solution for certain problems with neural networks, try not to step on the same rake twice:
1. The problem definition should not contain telepathic future projections in order to get a precise answer to the question of when and how much. The solution should be restricted to the form of a decision identification based on the current signs in a form of separation into few exclusive potential situations. For example, if you have a weather related task, do not try to find out when exactly it will start raining, or what will be the amount of rainfall in millimeters. Limit the forecast of a potential situation to a change towards a sunny or a rainy weather;
2. Cut all the unnecessary with "Occam's Razor". Some experimentators believe that the more layers the neural network has and the more complex its activation functions are, the better results turn out to be. This way you can certainly draw a more accurate line separating the identified objects based on their features. No one will dispute that. But why? After all, such approach is equivalent to building sand castles. If the border had a defined shape, that remained constant in time and independent from other circumstances, then the complexity to maximize a refinement would have a meaning. But most problems solved with the assistance of neural networks cannot be applied to this category. Financial instruments also do not stand still. Therefore, the simplest neural network with a low number of inputs and a single layer, may be more acceptable than a more complex construction with a disposable efficiency.

### References

1. Minsky, M. and Papert, S. (1969) PERCEPTRON; an Introduction to Computational Geometry, MIT Press, Massachussetts

Translated from Russian by MetaQuotes Software Corp.
Original article: https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1447

Attached files |
Last comments | Go to discussion (10)
| 14 Feb 2016 at 16:14

great great great article

Yury is pure master

i'm running optmization base on the code.

well, it is profitable.

| 30 Jun 2016 at 16:05

Great article! Thanks for sharing.

People like Yury are the backbones of this community. We newbies need to read more of these and pay our attention to learning the skills rather than trolling through the "Market" tab in MT.

| 22 Jul 2016 at 19:53

Saludos a todos.

Señor Yury Reshetov me puede decir por favor ¿porqué en el indicador del Perceptron (AC) usted escribe "symbol()" en lugar de "NULL"?.

=======================================================================================================

Greetings everyone.

Sir Yury Reshetov please tell me ¿why in the Perceptron indicator (AC) you write "symbol()" instead "NULL"?

| 30 Jan 2018 at 06:55

can anyone confirm the backtest? im getting different results when optimising it. Then when I tried the results that he "got" to the testing period, it is different also.

1. Optimise period is 2005.11.14 to 2006.09.17. M30, EURUSD, openprices, Maximal DD < 35%.

2. results from optimise is. "We will obtain the results for the input parameters: x1 = 146, x2 = 25, x3 = 154, x4 = 121, sl = 45."

3. Testing period is "3 months after optimization period". So 2006.09.18 to 2006.12.18. correct?

4. result is supposedly profitable, but not to me.

really interested in knowing this but the backtest is not consistent.

Thanks!

regards,

Francis

| 30 Jan 2018 at 06:57
Komgrit Sungkhaphong:

great great great article

Yury is pure master

i'm running optmization base on the code.

well, it is profitable.

hi can you share what did you do, parameters, etc? im getting different results. Would really appreciate it

Thank you!

Price Action. Automating the Inside Bar Trading Strategy

The article describes the development of a MetaTrader 4 Expert Advisor based on the Inside Bar strategy, including Inside Bar detection principles, as well as pending and stop order setting rules. Test and optimization results are provided as well.

Managing the MetaTrader Terminal via DLL

The article deals with managing MetaTrader user interface elements via an auxiliary DLL library using the example of changing push notification delivery settings. The library source code and the sample script are attached to the article.

Price Action. Automating the Engulfing Pattern Trading Strategy

This article describes a process of creating an Expert Advisor for MetaTrader 4 based on the Engulfing pattern, as well as the pattern recognition principle, rules of setting pending orders and stop orders. The results of testing and optimization are provided for your information.

Fuzzy logic to create manual trading strategies

This article suggests the ways of improving manual trading strategy by applying fuzzy set theory. As an example we have provided a step-by-step description of the strategy search and the selection of its parameters, followed by fuzzy logic application to blur overly formal criteria for the market entry. This way, after strategy modification we obtain flexible conditions for opening a position that has a reasonable reaction to a market situation.