From theory to practice - page 1803
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Comparing volatility between pairs without dividing by spread is a futile exercise.
and how to divide by spread in the kitchens of the Rana. Rana ?
they are aggregated and spreads cannot be trusted
it is better to look at the volatility of the price logarithm, or take the ratio of volatility in pips to the average price
I have to go to a log scale, but the numbers are very small, so it's hard to see...
I'm gradually switching to percentages in general - although it requires selecting a reference point, it's closer to the truth than pips/pips/x-spreads
and how to divide by spread in the kitchens of the Rana. Rana ?
they are aggregated and spreads can not be trusted
You gather statistics on spreads for 2-5 days and divide.
And you can't trust anyone at all, not even yourself, as recent studies of the mind and subconscious point out :)
You gather statistics on spreads over 2-5 days and divide them.
And you can't trust anyone at all, not even yourself, as recent studies of the mind and subconscious indicate :)
what in the @# of an aggregator's spread statistics if their visual spread is a fit for the answer ?
what in @# the aggregator's spread statistics if their visual spread is a fit for the answer ?
Right!
Full finish.
whatever it takes.
;)