From theory to practice - page 1796
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What about it?
)))
Lucky catch.
There really is no such thing.
All of us speculators, banks etc aremarket makers and puppets.
Puppet is a hilarious joke. Actually a big bid from a fat player.
What about it?
for me, price work and doll are the same name
I just don't want to use just my jargon.
dolls is common jargon, but there isn't any.For me, price work and doll are both the same name
I just don't want to use only my own jargon.
doll is common jargon, but there isn't any.Anyway it's clear, you can go on and on :)
for me, the price work is the same as the doll
is the closed-loop price work equal to zero?
is the closed-loop price work equal to zero?
on forex, no.
only on MOEX, after clearing
I posted a picture in this thread for Asulenko
Whether or not I deleted it, I don't remember.i.e. everyone knows that 2/3 of working capital is in the bank and 1/3 is spinning
---
no :))) you are dead wrong about that, it's more than 700% of deposits - a multiplier effect though :)
There may be 1000 lots of sell orders and 800 lots of buy orders in the market = yes, there is not equal willingness.
But if you look at buying and selling volumes, they are equal, as previously said. To buy something, you need someone to sell, and you buy exactly as much as you were sold, and vice versa.
From my observations, the market ascribes sellers to would-be buyers after the deal is done, and buyers to would-be sellers. Thus, there is a driving force in the market to zero out the imbalance that has appeared. What do you think of this hypothesis?
My observation is that the market assigns sellers to future buyers, once the transaction is completed, and buyers to future sellers. So there is a driving force in the market to zero out the imbalance that has arisen. How about this hypothesis?
BUY EURUSD - buy or sell?
My observation is that the market assigns sellers to future buyers, once the transaction is completed, and buyers to future sellers. Thus, there is a driving force in the market to zero out the imbalance that has arisen. How do you like this hypothesis?
The counter question BUY EURUSD - is this a buy or sell ?
Quite right
two sides of the coin need to be considered
Spreads are user prices, they are unprofitable for us.
on the contrary - these are commercial prices, they are profitable for them
but for the system to work and to be at least at breakeven, users need to lose more than they gain, so there can be no zeroing
it is a theoretical justification for the possibility of creating a bbloc
it started in the "advisor the world over" thread, then "not the grail, just a regular dablokos like this" thread
... and we all dwell in maya - the illusion of this world ...
;)