I've already described the idea before. I've traded this way. It was almost a grail. Only two parameters got in the way - the TF and the calculation period. doubled on friday.
I just want to accumulate some history first, and then we'll see.
Not solid)))) I think the market will start to pick up again. And a prettier picture)))) And what for? Don't you need money?) Once made and styled the subscribers, it's not for you to rivet grails )))) And there's no demand for you because you haven't promised anything to anyone, I have given you access, and you go there and do what you want)))).
stranger: It's no fun))) When you tell them that your indicator shows real volumes with CME, oh, then people will be attracted to you. And a prettier picture)))) And what for? Don't you need money?) Once made and styled subscribers, it's not for you to rivet grails)))) Who needs them - money?
It's not about money, it's about agony. They won't pay you back. I can give them back but not to everyone... prepare for now SQL-server for the accumulation of history. for example, the 2005-th. do not buy it for the sake of everything (the teacher will scold) ...
_new-rena: The only good thing is that the digital volumes are the most accurate, which you won't be able to find in meta... Rena, there are no trading volumes in mt, there's no one there at all, it's an empty bucket.
Rena, there are no trading volumes in mt, there's no one there at all, it's an empty bucket))))
What are the real ones then?) There' s even a division between traded in the pit and electronic)
He won't give you a link, will he?)
I've been struggling with this one for a long time, in order to determine whether a level is dead or not, without having information from the CME. but you can, you can tell from the chart. that's why I'm going back to the CME, because the task gets easier.
It allows you to understand what is there=) and the reports I get everything from change almost twice a year =)
I've already described the idea before. I've traded this way. It was almost a grail. Only two parameters got in the way - the TF and the calculation period. doubled on friday.
I just want to accumulate some history first, and then we'll see.
It's no fun))) When you tell them that your indicator shows real volumes with CME, oh, then people will be attracted to you. And a prettier picture)))) And what for? Don't you need money?) Once made and styled subscribers, it's not for you to rivet grails)))) Who needs them - money?
do they have real volumes? or just the conversion of futures and options?
does it have real volumes? or just the conversion of futures and options
What are the real ones then?) There's even a division between traded in the pit and electronic)
then there is no need to "dirty" the bot either
He won't give us the link.)
The only good thing is that the digital volumes are the most accurate, which you won't be able to find in meta... Rena, there are no trading volumes in mt, there's no one there at all, it's an empty bucket.
What are the real ones then?) There' s even a division between traded in the pit and electronic)
He won't give you a link, will he?)
you first need to understand the "physics" of how a quote is formed.
Rena. there's no bidding volume in mt, there's no one there at all, it's an empty bucket)))
A good thread https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/12342