FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2015 - page 1394

New comment
 
mmmoguschiy:

Here's another great video, but about smoking. There are, of course, some who don't know what sarcasm is and understand it differently. )))


 
artikul:
Don't be sarcastic, Teacher )))) Did I promise you a fuss on the top? ))) Enjoy and forget to sell ))))

I don't know what you're looking at, but at 1.075 the eu has moved into a neutral position )))) (but euro/yen stays in buy position)

By the way, an exit from a neutral position starts with a profit taking - a small thing, but nice)))

 
artikul:
The top is the high of the candle on which the frame closed )))

high...


 
tol64:

Here's another great video, but about smoking. There are, of course, some who don't know what sarcasm is and understand it differently. )))

By the way, the body needs carbon dioxide just as much))
 
Ishim:
don't know what you're looking at but at 1.075 the eu has moved into a neutral position )))) (and the euro/yen stays in a buy position)

I'm looking at the ripples, oh Mighty, and plotting cyclic lines on them ))))

Thanks ))))

 
tol64:

So how do you reconcile my opinion that you made an incorrect comparison with the fact that you inferred that it was as if I thought someone else's opinion, other than mine, was not worthy of consideration?

Cite first the post where I wrote that you were allegedly promoting usage. I wrote that what you write looks like you are trying to justify alcohol use. If that's not the case, then you can try formulating your thoughts in some other way.

Here:

It's not about difference, it's about quantity.

Are you suggesting that a person's value lies in what they consume? That my thought is correct and doesn't degrade you as a person, on the contrary. Try to read it once again and carefully. And instead of presenting fragments of quoted thoughts, give a complete quote. Otherwise, it looks like fudging.

//---

Something you have too many distortions. You only emphasize your wrongness with every post you make. Not only do you misunderstand what you are being answered, but you try to make a conflict out of it with false accusations.

You could simply end this dialogue. But if you really want to, you can ask questions, of course. )))

It'snot like that:

So how do you connect my opinion that you have made an incorrect comparison with the fact that you have concluded that I seem to think that someone else's opinion, other than mine, is not worthy of attention?

If my comparisons (without evidence) are incorrect, then you are only concerned with your opinion (direct speech above)

Cite first the post where I wrote that you were allegedly promoting usage. I wrote that what you write looks like you are trying to justify alcohol use. If that's not the case, then you can try formulating your thoughts in some other way.

That excuse about looks, seems, etc, Can you dispense with the subjunctive mood? And you can't tell me how to formulate my thoughts.

Here:Youdo not mindcalculating 0.03% of 1 kg. If you have problems with arithmetic, what are we doing in fore?

It's not about difference, it's about quantity.Was I interested in quality? Or are we not reading our opponent carefully? Your own is more important... Are they sticking together or what?

Do you think a man's value lies in what he uses? My thought is just the right one and it does not humiliate you as a human being in any way, on the contrary. Try to read it once again and carefully. And instead of presenting fragments of quoted thoughts, give a complete quote. Otherwise it looks like fudging.

I believe that no one has the right to judge others. If you think you are allowed to - mandate for all to see.

You seem to have too many distortions. You only emphasise your wrongness with every post you make. Not only do you misunderstand what you are being responded to, but you also try to make a conflict out of it with false accusations. I have no desire to comment on unsubstantiated allegations...

You could just end this dialogue. But if you really want to, you can ask questions, of course. )))I usually ask questions to smart people, you(I hope)are not one of them yet.

 
artikul:
The top is the high of the candle on which the frame closed )))
what do the lights have to do with it? where is the top at the "frenzy"?
 
Lesorub:

hey...


Who's high and who's not?
 
mmmoguschiy:
what does this have to do with lights? where's the top of the 'fuss'?
Sorry, but I'm not competent enough to operate on the concept of "level" )))) You'll have to ask an options specialist ))))
 
artikul:

I'm looking at the ripples, oh Mighty, and plotting cyclic lines on them ))))

Thanks ))))

HE is HE.
1...138713881389139013911392139313941395139613971398139914001401...2119
New comment
Reason: