Interesting and Humour - page 3648

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If they do, more than half the forum will disappear.....
Who's going to create threads about Grails?
It turns out that Metaquotes, ahead of the whole planet -- introducing obligatory publication of real name -- own insider or active participants of system and structural processes
No way. It's probably a payment system requirement.
And a solution is looming on the horizon - social networks not indexed by search engines, with addresses spread by word of mouth. In general, the course is underground.
No way. It's probably a payment system requirement.
Probably. But payment systems work with anonymous withdrawals.
How so? Withdrawals are made to a bank account or card - no anonymity. As the amounts go up, the requirements go up.
On second thoughts, the idea is not feasible, except to ban the internet altogether. First you have to come up with some kind of law on the status of the site as a social network. Or should I install a forum on my site and demand documents? Some kind of license is needed to demand documents.
How can this be? The withdrawal is made to a bank account or card - no anonymity. ...
Why? QIWI anonymous transfers someone to a payment system, e.g. unistream.
The payer information is not verified. The payer does not match the recipient.
On second thoughts, the idea is not feasible, except to ban the Internet altogether. First, some kind of law on the status of the site as a social network should be invented. Or, what, you install a forum on your site and you have to demand documents? And to demand documents, you need some kind of license.
First you have to define social networking.
Is mql5.com a social network?
First you have to define social networking.
Is mql5.com a social network?
Let Milonov think about that.
Let Milonov think it over.
That's because one could end up thinking that the internet is a social network and then the law would be unenforceable.