Errors, bugs, questions - page 3062
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is where the compiler should give an error:
The script prints nines.
This is where the compiler should give an error:
Script prints nines.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy testing
New version of MetaTrader 5 build 2980: Push notifications on trade operations
A100, 2021.06.21 08:35
In MQL, pointers are not actually pointers (no address arithmetic), but references
And if so, the implicit conversion ofa reference pointer to an object works
In C++ it would look like this
And since this is the case, an implicit pointer-to-object conversion works
In C++ it would look like this:
Since you are very knowledgeable about OOP. May I ask your opinion about it?
On the remote machine, this only started happening after some time. Before that, everything was working properly. I can't remember changing anything in the OS.
I remember something similar. Probably had something to do with the RDP connection.
And switching by windows with Alt+Tab seemed to help.
I remember something similar. Probably had something to do with the RDP connection.
And it seemed to help to switch by windows with Alt+Tab.
Unfortunately, it didn't help. Until I close Alert, the terminal is still not visible.
Since you are very knowledgeable about OOP. May I ask your opinion about it?
In C++ everything compiles without errors, in MQL without const (3) - it compiles too - it means that somewhere in MQL there is an error.
On the other hand - even if (4) did compile, the sequence of calls would still be different:
in MQL: 1-4-1-2
in C++: 1-4-1
so it's more correct to use variant (5) in any case
In C++ everything compiles without errors, in MQL without const (3) - also compiles - it means that somewhere in MQL there is an error
On the other hand, even if (4) did compile, the sequence of calls would be different:
in MQL: 1-4-1-2
in C++: 1-4-1
so it's more correct to use variant (5) in any case
Darn, I still don't get it, so tell me, people of goodwill:
To prevent all open files in Metaeditor from crashing at the perfect moment, what do I have to do?
Metaeditor.ini manually backed up or what? seriously.
Just that not even after closing/opening, but right in the open all of a sudden everything is gone. The reason is unclear.
Darn, I still don't get it, so tell me, people of goodwill:
To prevent all open files in Metaeditor from crashing at the perfect moment, what do I have to do?
Metaeditor.ini manually backed up or what? seriously.
Just that not even after closing/opening, but right in the open all of a sudden everything is gone. The reason is unclear.
There is a customer. I have done his work. He wanted to work with me again. Created a job. Could not figure it out or he was missing a step where he needs to attach a specification.
Deleted the job. According to the rules, you can only create one job. Can not create, wants to create another account. (I advised him not to do this, and wrote that I will try to address myself in support).
Offered to pay in advance not here, to which I refused. Because it is not fair to the third party (MKL).
Please give him the opportunity to create a job here.
Somehow this is not right. There is a person willing to pay for the work, there is a performer who agrees to do it and pay a commission. The process is halted.
https://www.mql5.com/en/users/mbende/feedbacks