Here you go
Did not alter that indicator in any way. In fact this is a separate indicator that needs that indicator from your post to work (it is calling the "RK-PrCh_Signal-1" indicator from your post in order to get the calculated values). ShowSignalOnlyOnLastBaroption is added in order to allow signals showing only on last bar belonging to target time frame bar (the assumption is that the signal was valid on close of the target bar (so at the last bar of the target time frame bar)) or it should be repeated on all the bars that belong to target bar.
post 3925, if you have the time.
High Low Dashboard
You programmed the attached MTF Hi Low dashboard a while ago - it is based on candle highs / lows. Is it possible to re-code it so that higher high and lower low calculations are based on the "3 level semafor" indicator (depth to be user configurable), or if not on zig zag (non-lag)?
Thank you so much
Great as usual Mladen.
Pleasure to be a member here. I plan to subscribe to advanced next month. Because of you and the other very valued people here.
And a bit more
Mladen, just checked the QQE combined, but it gives very different results coparing to the QQE i use (here attached)
Where is the kick & can you make the indicator based on the attached QQE.
And if it's not very much to ask - can you make an EA?
Thanks again in advance
In both examples "combined" time frames (both) are set to current time frame, in which case it shows only the current time frame. As it is visible it changes colors at exactly the right places. Also checked when it works in combined 2 time frames and it works as it should (as I understood from your description - if that is not the case, please let me know, since neither of the indicators has lines colored as you described them in your description)
Sorry to loose your time. Yes I'm using the fast line (2.618). But when i've configured two QQE indicators from previous post and the combined QQE indicator, it gives some differences (see attached).
The upper is in M15 and the lower in H1
Thanks in advance for the help
that indicator you are using is not a mtf indicator. It has a couple of coding errors that are made when it works in mtf mode, and it makes it anything but a mtf. You can test it easily : mtf should give a same current value of a target time frame regardless of a current chart time frame. The indicator you posted is never going to show a correct value of a target time frame when in mtf mode (even more, i suspect that it will not show a singe correct value when in mtf mode). As a test : place a 1 hour indicator on a 15 minutes chart and mark the current values. Now change to 1 hour. As you will see the values are different. So what values did it show then on 15 minute chart? Those are not 1 hour values.
Here is a comparison of a correct (upper) way how a QQE should look and the one you posted (lower). On the lower picture there is the original target time frame chart (1 hour) As you can see it is showing values that do not exist at the target time frame and it is going to "invent" values for every time frame that it is attached to that is different from the target time frame (and those results are never going to be the same)
I know that it is easy to say "forget about that indicator" but that is what I can say. It has too many errors that are making it anything but multi time frame indicator when it is supposed to be multi time frame
This is another adaptive macd this version is using advanced kaufman ama as slow macd and a choice of the 16 different averages for the fast ma and macd signal also made an averages bands is actually 2 bands both indicators are mtf with alerts and arrows.
updated and upgraded versions here: https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general
Another in Bollinger band mode this is percent bollinger smooth mtf. Smoothed with jurik.
Updated version posted here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general
Kind request to modify the attached indicator to view in separate window.
I found the histogram version, but would ideally like it with some indication of how long the body/wicks are...not sure if that's possible.
Thanks in advance.