I want to build a PC to work with MT5, what do you advise and why? - page 55

New comment
 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:
Why not put them on a VPS (doesn't have to be methaquot)?

You should keep your treasure at home or in a bank

 
lynxntech #:

you could run a test robot, compare it to a modern robot.

I have 13790f 64gb to adjust the number of passes to the kernels, there is no sense to test on multithreading, the result will be 1v1 with only physical cores.

I had a big otpa going on for a few days on 3 machines, the most modern cores did 2 times more passes than these xeon cores. But 36 physical cores made it 5 times faster. Connecting up to 72 threads gives another 20-30% speedup on bars. And if on real ticks, even 192 mb of memory is not enough, 1 thread sometimes consumes up to 5 Gg at the end of a pass. I even had to switch off a part of real physical cores.
 
JRandomTrader #:
Irbis ISDP1003HA

CPU is dead, I got it on ali, i7-10510U fanless, no ram, no ssd, it's great, it's right on the table, cooling by the case, consumption like a laptop without screen

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
Can I get something less bdsm'noe?) I've settled on a laptop, imho, very convenient.
Just when the optimiser writes that another 300 hours, it became sad. So I built a monster.
Real ticks - tested scalpers at 5-20 pts. But nothing profitable((
Markup eats everything. Let's see what will happen on exchange crypto via API.... I think it's smaller there. Only real ticks are not there.
 
Forester #:
Connecting up to 72 threads gives 20-30% more speed on bars.

Multithreading does not give the same advantage in the tester, how many times have already tested, there 1v1 goes, and multithreading consumes 2 times more memory.

 
lynxntech #:

multithreading does not give advantage in the tester, how many times have already tested, there 1v1 goes, and multithreading consumes memory 2 times more.

Optimisation of 100000 jobs on 72+8 agents or on 8 agents - which is faster?
 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:
And why not put them on a VPS (not necessarily metaquot)?
Vps is also available, but not always convenient and necessary )
I mainly used it for arbitrage, but otherwise, it makes almost no difference
 
Forester #:
Optimisation of 100000 jobs on 72+8 agents or on 8 agents - which is faster?

I mean physical kernels, 72 threads pass speed will be equal to physical 36 kernels, i.e. 36 kernels for 2 rounds will pass the same as 72 threads, only 72 threads at once will eat 2 times more memory

 
lynxntech #:

I'm talking about physical cores, 72 threads pass speed will be equal to physical 36 cores, i.e. 36 cores for 2 rounds will pass the same as 72 threads, only 72 threads at once will eat 2 more memory.

Got it.
Yes, memory was not enough on real ticks. But the overall increase in the speed of opta for example on bars by 20 per cent was still and the consumption of watts by 100 increased. So it makes a little sense if memory is enough.
 
lynxntech #:

A laptop is noisy, and a MINI-PC server can be had in a fanless aluminium case.

Yeah, but there's some kind of monitor to put in there, some kind of hat. Why would I want to do that?
1...484950515253545556575859606162...66
New comment