Non-dynamic trading. - page 7

 
artmedia70:

... and make indicators that will show us all this automatically...

What's the sense of "proudly" saying "I trade without indicators" when using two hundred and three indicators on one chart, but not standard ones, but those obtained free of charge on trash sites that distribute decompiles?

And they, in turn, use calculations of standard MACs...

What are you talking about? What dumpsites, what two hundred and three indicators? The question was originally posed about non-syndicator trading.
 
barabashkakvn:
What are you talking about? What dumps, what two hundred and three indicators? The question was originally posed about trading without indicators.

I am referring to your image: "If there is no standard MT4/MT5 indicator on the chart - consider this trading as non-syndicator trading".

There is no such thing as trading without indicators. Even moon phases are indicators ;)

An indicator is a product that shows/indicates in one way or another the results of analysis/direction and the moment of taking a decision.

It doesn't matter what the indicator is technically - it will still be one, whatever it is ;)

 

It is time to end this futile argument and move on to new trading strategies, for example:

Accurately identifying market entry points using the method of dynamic movement of a flat round-shaped object.

Or

Identifying meaningful patterns in the market by analysing the residuals of a high-calorie and invigorating ingredient cooked in natural pure water.

 
VNIK:

It's time to end this futile argument and move on to new trading strategies, for example:

Accurately identifying market entry points using the method of dynamic movement of a flat round-shaped object.

Or

Identifying meaningful patterns in the market by analysing the residuals of a high-calorie and invigorating ingredient cooked in natural pure water.

It's not easy to visualise on the spot. Maybe you can draw a picture?
 
barabashkakvn:
It's not easy to visualise. Why don't you draw a picture?
Yes, this method is very complicated and not yet fully understood! Although it is more commonly known as "flipping a coin..."
 
VNIK:
Yes, this method is very complicated and not yet fully understood! Although it's more commonly known as "flipping a coin..."
Nah, you can't be serious :).
 
e.g. a buy & hold strategy is also unsyndicatorial
 
transcendreamer:
For example a buy & hold strategy is also unsyndicatorial.

If there is no basis under the decision, then it is non-syndicated. But, if at least one property of a financial instrument has been requested, then no.

For example, you have only been given the name of a stock that you know nothing about at all. You decide to buy and hold it without asking anything about it. In such a case, the trade is unsyndicatorial. ))

 
barabashkakvn:
What are you talking about? What dumps, what two hundred and three indicators? The question was originally asked about indicatorless trading.

That's what I'm asking - I have a bunch of indicators. All of them are built according to the principle "The indicator template asks for a class that calculates some value and outputs this value on the price chart". Note that the indicator itself doesn't even "know" what it is displaying - it's all encapsulated inside the detector class. You can replace the class and the indicator will display other things without noticing it.

There is an Expert Advisor that queries these same classes, and based on these values - without drawing anything on the chart - performs trading actions.

What kind of trading? Indicator or non-instrumental?

 
tol64:

If there is no basis under the decision, then it is non-syndicated. But, if at least one property of a financial instrument has been requested, then no.

For example, you have only been given the name of a stock that you know nothing about at all. You decide to buy and hold it without asking anything about it. In such a case, the trade is unsyndicatorial. ))

What do you mean "unsyndicatorily"? And where does the name of the stock come from, if not from an indicator?

Reason: