Interesting and Humour - page 2374
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The dude hovered in the sky and the train was still going. Maybe the whole jump is done the same way. It's written everywhere on the internet that it's a jump from a height of 6 metres, although you can see it's higher than a three-storey house.
*ass.
Here's more about 'bookmarking':
http://www.securitylab.ru/contest/437841.php - first part
http://www.securitylab.ru/contest/438339.php - second part
Who can explain this to me ???
Уважаемые клиенты!
As of 5 August 2014, a change to the GKFX Non-Trading Regulations will come into effect.
Paragraph 1.8.4:
Examples of questionable actions are given below for information:
Respectfully,
GKFX
What idiot came up with these clauses ???
But this idiot understands that his idiocy is limited by some kind of bar. So he removes that limiting bar of his idiocy altogether by introducing the last item"Anything unusual" (!!!)
I wonder what kind of clerk would separate"ordinary" from"unusual" ???
People, think about these paragraphs !!! These paragraphs are written by a retard for retards -- a retard cannot allow retards to exist !!!!
Or have I lost my sense of humour, so I took this letter at face value?
Who can explain this to me?
What idiot came up with these points ???
But this idiot understands that his idiocy is limited by a bar. So he removes that limiting bar of his idiocy altogether by introducing the last item"Anything unusual" (!!!)
I wonder what kind of clerk would separate"ordinary" from"unusual" ???
People, think about these paragraphs !!! These paragraphs are written by a retard for retards -- a retard cannot allow retards to exist !!!!
Or have I lost my sense of humour, so I took this letter at face value?
What's not clear, a detailed comment is given, this is protection against dubious transactions through a brokerage account, normal clients have nothing to fear. There is similar protection even on this site, only the authors have made such shenanigans immediately impossible without any clauses. Also, maybe you didn't understand that we are talking about non-trading operations: deposit/withdrawal of money.
So you think it's OK.
How about this? :
Do you think everything is OK?
So you think it's OK.
How about this? :
Do you think it's okay?
Well, it's a top priority to save gamers from themselves, what are you worried about?
That's not news to me, it's a well-known fact. I've even had a flash drive like that.
Who can explain this to me?
What idiot came up with these points ???
But this idiot understands that his idiocy is limited by a bar. So he removes that limiting bar of his idiocy altogether by introducing the last item"Anything unusual" (!!!)
I wonder what kind of clerk would separate"ordinary" from"unusual" ???
People, think about these paragraphs !!! These paragraphs are written by a retard for retards -- a retard cannot allow retards to exist !!!!
Or have I lost my sense of humour, so I took this letter at face value?
A little later there should have been a letter explaining it. ))
Dear customers!
While I'm here on a business trip, my team is sabotaging )))).
I'll dot the i's and cross the t's at once.
Paragraph 1.8.4:
Client is informed that GKFX has the right to withhold a commission of 5% of the withdrawable amount from the Client's Trading Account if suspicious non-trading operations are identified. This amount includes reimbursable fees for deposits and withdrawals to the Client.
We had this point before, it was just not 5%, but 3%.
There are a lot of transiters now. 3% does not seem to scare them off. They decided to increase it to 5, but someone in the team decided to add examples that I think are unnecessary, and we did fine without them.
This clause will only apply (as it has been applied for a long time) to those who deposit money one way and withdraw another, while showing no trade (or clearly a formal one). Or to those who REALLY deposit and withdraw without making any trade.
If you are trading and not using the company as a cheap exchange, you have nothing to fear. We have been using this point for over a year now, but I am sure that hardly anyone here has experienced it. It will continue to be so.
It is an extremely rare item that we apply, and always with prior notification or discussion with the account holder. You can see how the years of lawlessness going on in the forex industry has made many traders unnecessarily fearful. Have no doubt, we are not trying to squeeze our clients or profit by dubious means. We are just trying to protect ourselves from the transitory traders, so as not to take away from all normal clients the ability to deposit one way and withdraw another, which we believe is our serious advantage.
I hope I have answered all questions and dispelled all doubts.
Regards,
General Manager of GKFX
Dmitry Rannev