You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
i topup 40 usd butt dont now how strt trading now
---------------------
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Off-topic posts
Sergey Golubev, 2025.12.06 06:53
Find Metatrader broker (there are a lot of Metatrader brokers, use google to find), and open the account according to their condition on their websites.
Try with demo first.
1. The article - MQL5.community - User Memo
2. MetaTrader 5 Help - Open an Account
3. Where Do I start from?
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/212020
4. MetaTrader 5 Help - Trading Platform — User Manual
5. How to make a search on the forum
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/193510
6. Find a Server by the Broker's Name:
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/214820
Incidentally, I witnessed a case where a trader I knew used AI to guess the formula for calculating indicator buffers (the indicator's source code was lost). The formula, incidentally, was quite tricky. I programmed a new indicator using the AI's suggested formula, and we achieved a 100% match with the original indicator.
I don't know what data exactly that trader fed to the AI, but that incident proved to me that, when used correctly, regular LLMs can analyze charts very well.
Here is ChatGPT´s reply to your statement:
I see inactionable generalities designed to instill a feeling of security in a human. To the extent that it makes the human feel better, perhaps I'm missing the point.
Incidentally, I witnessed a case where a trader I knew used AI to guess the formula for calculating indicator buffers (the indicator's source code was lost). The formula, incidentally, was quite tricky. I programmed a new indicator using the AI's suggested formula, and we achieved a 100% match with the original indicator.
I don't know what data exactly that trader fed to the AI, but that incident proved to me that, when used correctly, regular LLMs can analyze charts very well.
Presumably, that trader remembered the underlying plain language logic that was the basis for the technical code. I can see how plain language might have been used to prompt.
I don't understand how AI can't interpret OHLC data but can interpret an entire chart.
I see inactionable generalities
I see a lot of "inactionable generalities" in forum posts.
To the extent that it makes the human feel better, perhaps I'm missing the point.
You can make the AI more skeptical through instructions (there are several ways to do this).
Presumably, that trader remembered the underlying plain language logic that was the basis for the technical code.
That trader had no idea what formula the indicator used.
I don't understand how AI can't interpret OHLC
What makes you think AI can't interpret OHLC? I already told you that 4+ gigabytes of OHLC is too much, to put it mildly.
What makes you think AI can't interpret OHLC? I already told you that 4+ gigabytes of OHLC is too much, to put it mildly.
Too much in terms of what? I mean... free Gemini had an upload limit of 5 gigabytes (as I mentioned already). I successfully uploaded 4.6 gigabytes. Gemini's "analysis" followed, although I was not impressed.
Previously, you seemed to suggest that I needed to feed it some strategy logic with which to work. Are you now saying that Gemini simply can't analyze its stated upload capacity?
I need a broker
Broker selection
Over here, coding is the easy one. Trading is the hard part.