Elite indicators :) - page 1103

Mladen Rakic
151212
Mladen Rakic  
camisa:
hi mladen, the indicator does not draw; does it another another indicator to run?

It works on my terminal. It does not need any other indicator (it does not depend on anything else)

Tested it with build 840 and build 950 - works OK on both (the same ex4 file that I posted)

Files:
mntiwana
4536
mntiwana  
mrtools:

Mntiwana, check out this picture of the result of adding smooth to the step cci it adds considerable lag to the step ma if i figure out a better way of smoothing it will post it.

Dearest MRTOOLS,

so much thanks for the efforts you made for trying it smooth with nonlag ma,you are absolutely right as for laging factor when smoothed,do you think reducing some of periods + some of smoothing at least better than flying frequently of cci line but of course you knows better than me which method will be more suitable for not countable lagging,and i am sure you will be find it at the end,lol.:),nothing is impossible for you twice genious stars.here is a picture with cci advanced ver with blue line,thanks.

regards

CCI - Nrp - Mtf Advanced Alerts 2.mq4

mntiwana
4536
mntiwana  
mladen:

It works on my terminal. It does not need any other indicator (it does not depend on anything else)

Tested it with build 840 and build 950 - works OK on both (the same ex4 file that I posted)

Dearest MLADEN,

with excuses,the problem exist with when divergence applied true but when it is in default mode with divergence false,indicator working properly,thanks

regards

Mladen Rakic
151212
Mladen Rakic  
mntiwana:

Dearest MLADEN,

with excuses,the problem exist with when divergence applied true but when it is in default mode with divergence false,indicator working properly,thanks

regards

Yes, you guys are right

Here is a version that solves that problem : cci_study_3_1.ex4

Files:
sebatian
676
sebatian  
mladen:

Yes, you guys are right

Here is a version that solves that problem : cci_study_3_1.ex4

Now it works OK

tora
10
tora  
mladen:

Yes, you guys are right

Here is a version that solves that problem : cci_study_3_1.ex4

Thanks a lot mr Mladen

mntiwana
4536
mntiwana  
mladen:

Yes, you guys are right

Here is a version that solves that problem : cci_study_3_1.ex4

Dearest MLADEN and MRTOOLS,

i played and experiment this master piece of cci,it have a lot to do with,much flexible with a lot of options,a complete unit.can be fit and fix in any situation......to be very frank,want kiss the expert hands of the creator, ,i am proud of being with such masters.my extreme wish and request for to adapt it in step ma of cci,if technically and code wise possible.a lot of thanks for this all in one multi functional and the proud of cci family.:)

regards

Files:
Juan Fernandez
2352
Juan Fernandez  
mladen:

It is not too hard

But since some averages depend on previous values (try EMA on 50 bars only, for example) I am not introducing that limitation. Also, since the indicator calculates only the changed bars, there is no CPU overhead that would be reduced by introducing bars limitation (it calculates 2 bars 99.999% of time, so, 99.999% of time it hardly uses any CPU time at all)

The problem is the initialization. I made an indicator for currencies strength with 2 MAs for TF. You have 2 MAs x 14 currencies x 3 TFs. Every time you change TF chart have recalcule all. And even I have short history ( 7500 bars ) indicator need time for finish ( a few seconds ). Same if you use currencies dash and open chart with indicator like this. For that i said is good have this option. Better 50 bars + preroll ( all indicators needs some extra bars for have right values from bar you choose) than 7500 bars. The PC screen is limited and you cant see 28 pairs at same time But is only a suggestion

William Snyder
9496
William Snyder  
mntiwana:

Dearest MRTOOLS,

so much thanks for the efforts you made for trying it smooth with nonlag ma,you are absolutely right as for laging factor when smoothed,do you think reducing some of periods + some of smoothing at least better than flying frequently of cci line but of course you knows better than me which method will be more suitable for not countable lagging,and i am sure you will be find it at the end,lol.:),nothing is impossible for you twice genious stars.here is a picture with cci advanced ver with blue line,thanks.

regards

CCI - Nrp - Mtf Advanced Alerts 2.mq4

Mntiwana, this one is done similar to the version you posted except it has option for one of the 31 moving averages,

stepma_of_cci_smooth.ex4

mntiwana
4536
mntiwana  
mrtools:

Mntiwana, this one is done similar to the version you posted except it has option for one of the 31 moving averages,

stepma_of_cci_smooth.ex4

Dearest MRTOOLS,

so much thanks for early response,now it is looking more pretty than before,more capable,great job.can i request for more help to add slope colors (to dark grey line} with two options,color change on zero line cross true/false and color change on step ma line cross true/false,i am bit greedy for more responsive options, .thanks a lot.

regards

one question plz,in cci study 3,all 31 ma averages were applied as averaging methods along with as smoothing methods too,do they act as double,i means multiplying/calculating twice......if it can be added here too, .

regards

Files:
1_18.png 177 kb