The Oracle Pro
- 指标
-
Ottaviano De Cicco
最好的交易已经在你的图表上。
你只是还看不到它们。
Merkava Labs:机构级MT5系统,解码
价格已经揭示的信息。
🌐 merkavalabs.com → 洞察结构。
📧 contact@merkavalabs.com - 版本: 1.2
- 更新: 25 六月 2026
- 激活: 10
The Oracle Pro:用于 MT5 的合成多周期偏向引擎
☀️ 夏季上市优惠 — 早期买家可以 199 USD 获得 The Oracle Pro。价格将随关注度上升;最终价格 399 USD。
The Oracle Pro 是一款面向高要求与专业交易者的 MetaTrader 5 高级多周期偏向引擎。它以纪律回答一个问题:当前每个周期的方向偏向是什么、强度如何、各周期之间的一致程度如何?一切仅在已收盘的 K 线上计算——绝不重绘。
The Oracle Pro 是一套多因子共识系统。它将专有指标与优化算法整合为单一而精密的共识向量,并在单个指标实例内,跨当前周期与更高周期的堆栈进行读取——而不是在多个图表上堆叠互不相关的工具。
它是 Oracle 共识方法的专业进化版:完整重建为高级操作控制台,面向希望在一个纪律化工作流中获得深度、多周期背景与背离洞察的交易者。
是偏向引擎,而非信号生成器
The Oracle Pro 明确自身定位。它是一款提供纪律化方向背景的多周期多因子偏向指标。它不是信号生成器:不承诺入场、出场或盈利。偏向是背景——你在其方向上交易自己的设置,当共识破裂或质量低下时则按兵不动。一个诚实地说"现在不要"的过滤器,正是它说"现在可以"时你能够信赖的那一个。
为高要求交易者打造
- 精密的多因子共识 — 方向读数来自一套涵盖多个市场维度的专有多模型架构,而非单一振荡器或趋势线。
- 单实例多周期堆栈 — 当前周期加上第一与第二更高周期在一个指标内处理,并采用感知经纪商的锚定,在交易时段缺口与周末后重建时表现稳健。
- 独家 Vector Consensus Divergence — 在 Merkava Labs 全线产品中,VCD 仅搭载于 The Oracle Pro。
- 双状态引擎 — 选择适合你风格的方向引擎:Trend State 或 Momentum State。
- 操作控制台 — 共识色带、面板、扫描器、质量读数、背离标记与可供 EA 使用的缓冲区,被设计为一个专业工作流。
合成周期架构:真实的分形维度
The Oracle Pro 通过级联数据流,从 M1 数据合成地重建更高周期。这消除了对脆弱的经纪商高周期数据以及已记录的中间周期延迟缺陷的依赖,并解锁了大多数指标做不到的能力:标准平台周期阶梯根本不提供的周期链。
通过可配置的基准比率,你可以构建真正按尺度最优的周期链——例如 M3 / M9 / M27——而不必被迫接受 M5 / M15 / H1 这种随意的跳跃。Merkava Labs 的研究收敛于约 3 倍的基准比率,作为相邻分析尺度之间在科学上最优的分隔,并随更高周期递增。The Oracle Pro 让你在已收盘的合成 K 线上直接探索价格结构的这些真实分形维度,并采用强制的一根 K 线位移,使高周期背景始终具有因果性,绝不前视。
双状态引擎
The Oracle Pro 让你选择驱动方向状态的引擎,而共识的其余部分、面板与缓冲区保持完全一致:
- Trend State(默认)— 一个平稳、持久的方向状态引擎。它已针对在更高周期(H1 以上)仅以当前周期运行而优化,那里趋势持续、偏向稳定。加入更高周期层会带来更多结构性确认与更高安全性,但也会显著降低偏向变化的频率——更少翻转,更多惯性。
- Momentum State — 一个更快、更灵敏的引擎,适用于剥头皮与较低周期。它更早捕捉快速波动,代价是更多假翻转。当反应速度比平滑度更重要时使用它。
Vector Consensus Divergence
经典背离等待枢轴点,而枢轴点在结构上需要未来 K 线来确认。VCD 则不同:它在已启用的周期上监测价格与内部多模型共识之间的斜率关系。当价格持续朝一个方向推进,而共识压力开始倒向另一侧时,The Oracle Pro 可标记潜在的趋势衰竭预警,将直方图堆栈暗化为统一的预警列,并可选地绘制箭头。
VCD 是一个预警与背景层,而非反转预测器。它旨在帮助你察觉共识何时开始破裂、收紧背景、避免薄弱的顺势续入,或更有纪律地为可能的状态切换做准备。在 VCD 触发之前,需要多少个底层指标发生背离,由你来控制。
核心工作流
- CTF 层 读取当前图表周期。
- HTF1 层 加入第一更高周期的共识背景。
- HTF2 层 加入第二更高周期的共识背景。
- 信念色带 按层显示偏向方向与强度(强 / 弱)。
- 共识切换标记 突出显示对齐共识在已启用各层之间发生变化的位置。
- VCD 标记与暗化色带 突出显示价格与共识的结构性背离。
- 可选扫描器 将相同逻辑汇总到多个周期行中。
面板、扫描器与质量读数
- 带右侧层标签的 CTF / HTF1 / HTF2 三色带显示。
- 可选面板,显示每层偏向状态、信念以及 0-100 的质量评分。
- 质量综合了票数优势、偏向稳定性与多周期对齐——快速判断当前背景的可信程度。
- 可选的多周期扫描器面板。
- 20 种专业配色主题、可选图表背景、可配置的箭头样式与视觉密度。
周期结构与解析
- 结构 — 运行 1、2 或 3 个周期(仅 CTF、CTF + 一个更高周期,或完整的三层堆栈)。
- HTF 解析 — 机构式自动阶梯、手动固定周期,或合成比率预设(x2 至 x6,默认 x3)。
- HTF 形成中 K 线 — 可选预览正在形成的更高周期 K 线;默认偏好已确认的 HTF 状态。
EA 与 CopyBuffer 工作流
The Oracle Pro 提供稳定的公开缓冲区:CTF / HTF1 / HTF2 共识状态、共识切换事件、VCD 事件、质量评分与扫描器偏向。Expert Advisor 与仪表板工具通过标准的 MT5 CopyBuffer 调用读取状态。对于防重绘逻辑,请始终读取已确认(已收盘)的 K 线。
按风格的推荐用法
- 波段 / 持仓 — 偏向看 H4-D1,确认看 H1;在 H1 以上,仅当前周期的 Trend State 已是强劲而稳定的读数。
- 日内 / 日内交易 — 在 M1-M15 执行,方向取自更高周期背景;在新鲜偏向的方向上交易你自己的设置,当面板显示破裂或低质量共识时按兵不动。
- 剥头皮 — 考虑使用 Momentum State 以获得更快反应(翻转更多),并依靠合成比率链获得紧凑、按尺度最优的 HTF 背景。
技术说明
- 平台:MetaTrader 5
- 产品类型:自定义指标
- 市场:外汇、加密货币、指数、金属、能源与股票
- 默认结构:当前周期(按需添加 HTF1 / HTF2)
- 已收盘 K 线逻辑、强制 HTF 一根 K 线位移、绝不重绘
- 兼容策略测试器
- 多实例安全
- 无 DLL
重要提示: The Oracle Pro 是一款技术分析与决策支持工具。它不承诺盈利,也不能取代风险管理、仓位规模控制或交易者自身的判断。
用户手册:在此下载完整的 PDF 手册: https://www.mql5.com/go?link=https://merkavalabs.com/docs.html
支持: 通过 MQL5 产品评论与私信提供。购买后包含产品更新。

After several weeks of using The Oracle Pro as part of my daily trading routine, I feel I now have enough experience to give an honest opinion.
This is simply my personal experience using Oracle as part of my own trading workflow.
I mainly trade lower timeframes, especially M5, where it's very easy to become focused on what's happening on your chart and lose sight of the bigger market picture. That's where Oracle has genuinely helped me broaden the way I analyse each trade.
The biggest impact Oracle has had on my trading is the way I interpret its signals. Instead of looking at them in isolation, I now analyse them within a much broader market context. That's where I've noticed the biggest improvement in the way I approach my trading decisions.
One of the things I appreciate most is the confidence that comes from being able to verify that the idea I'm seeing on my trading timeframe is aligned with the higher-timeframe picture. It doesn't mean the trade is guaranteed to work—that's never how markets work—but it does make me feel that every decision is much better supported before I commit to it.
Before using Oracle, I tended to focus mainly on the opportunities that appeared on my trading timeframe. Now, beyond simply seeing an opportunity, I have a much clearer understanding of why it makes sense to take it—or why it's better to wait for a higher-quality setup. It may seem like a small change, but it has made me approach trading with much more confidence and discipline.
Interestingly, the biggest difference hasn't been the trades I've decided to take, but the trades I've chosen not to take after evaluating the broader market picture. In many cases, avoiding a trade has been just as valuable as finding a good one.
Over the past few weeks, Oracle and Azimuth have naturally become part of a single workflow for me. Oracle helps me understand the broader market context, while Azimuth helps me read price structure and identify trade opportunities. To me, they don't compete with each other—they complement each other because each one addresses a different part of the decision-making process.
If I could suggest one possible direction for future development, it would be the continued evolution of the Oracle + Azimuth ecosystem.
Azimuth provides a very clear view of market structure through its swing analysis. In my opinion, that information adds another valuable layer to understanding how price is developing at any given moment.
It would be very interesting to explore an optional way of incorporating that structural information as an additional layer during context validation. I believe that could further improve the synchronisation between higher-timeframe context, price structure and execution timing.
Although I notice this particularly because I do a lot of M5 scalping, I believe the idea is equally applicable to any timeframe. The relationship between context, structure and timing exists regardless of the timeframe or trading style.
I think this could become a very valuable evolution for traders who already use both tools together as part of the same analytical workflow.
Another aspect I've really appreciated is the support. Whenever I've had a question or needed clarification, the team has always been approachable, willing to help, and happy to explain things in detail. You never get the feeling that you're left on your own after purchasing the product. That level of support gives you confidence, especially when you're investing time learning a professional trading tool. On top of that, it's clear that they genuinely listen to user feedback and are committed to continuously improving the ecosystem, which, in my opinion, adds significant value beyond the products themselves.
Overall, my experience with Oracle has been genuinely positive. Oracle hasn't changed the way I find trading opportunities; it has changed the way I decide whether those opportunities are worth taking. Now I spend much more time validating whether a trade idea truly makes sense before entering the market. That has made me far more selective and, above all, has given me greater confidence that the decisions I make are built on a much stronger foundation.
Looking back, that's probably been the biggest improvement in my trading since I started using Oracle.