Risk management tools

New comment
 
What are the best risk management tools you have used in trading and why ?
 

As an example:

============

Money Management


The forum

  1. MM (money management) calculation, indicators, discussion, tools: calculate your lot size and so on. Original thread with several versions.
  2. MoneyManagement EA is on this thread: it shows you market information and money management on the chart. 
  3. Forex Money Management, Part 1 - good small thread
  4. Useful money management expert - the thread with the EA 
  5. Stop Your Mind From Causing You to Take Profits Too Soon - the post with the educational video 
  6. Money Management: How to Determine an Initial Stop Level - the post with the educational video 
  7. Why Most Traders Lose Money and The Solution - the post with the educational video

The articles

  1. Statistical Verification of the Labouchere Money Management System
  2. Money management in trading - 
  3. Functions for Money Management in an Expert Advisor 
  4. Fallacies, Part 1: Money Management is Secondary and Not Very Important 
  5. MQL5 Wizard: How to Create a Risk and Money Management Module 
  6. Money Management Revisited 
  7. Cross-Platform Expert Advisor: Money Management 
  8. Limitless Opportunities with MetaTrader 5 and MQL5 
  9. Money Management by Vince. Implementation as a module for MQL5 Wizard

CodeBase

============
 
I don't know if you're talking about manual trading or automated trading. Best money management is a time filter to filter out volatile hours, and a lot multiplier based on risk percentage. Then a trailing stop is obviously good money management if you don't set take profit.
 
Absolutely. Partial Closure is especially useful in automatic mode, as it helps manage positions more flexibly and lock in partial profit.
[Deleted]  
Tarek Sayed:
What are the best risk management tools you have used in trading and why ?

To minimize drawdown and manage risk effectively:

  • Limit Position Size: Risk only 1–2% of your capital per trade.

  • Use Automated Tools: Utilize Money Management EAs to calculate lot sizes automatically based on your stop-loss distance.

  • Filter Volatility: Use time filters to avoid trading during high-impact, unpredictable market hours.

  • Partial Closures: Scale out of positions to lock in profits and reduce exposure as the trade moves in your favor.

  • Implement Trailing Stops: Protect gains by automatically adjusting your stop-loss level as prices trend.

Risk management tools
Risk management tools
  • 2024.08.14
  • www.mql5.com
What are the best risk management tools you have used in trading and why...
 

Sergey's list and Conor's point (time filter + risk-percent lot multiplier + trailing) already cover the standard toolbox, so I'll add the two things that in my experience move drawdown more than the choice of tool:

1) What you anchor the risk percent to. Risking 1-2% is only half the rule - the question is 1-2% of what. If it's the account balance or the opening balance, the sizing quietly works against you: after a winning streak you scale up into the same setups and give the gains back, and inside a drawdown you keep risking the same absolute amount and dig deeper. Anchoring the percent to the running equity high-water mark makes the lot auto-de-risk when you're underwater and only re-expand once you recover. That is also exactly what a funded/prop daily-loss limit measures, so it doubles as challenge protection.

2) Correlated exposure. Position sizing, partial closes and trailing are all per-trade tools - none of them cap how much of the book is really one bet. Running 1% on EURUSD, 1% on GBPUSD and 1% on XAUUSD at once is not 3% across three markets, it's closer to 3% on a single factor (the US dollar), because those legs move together. The missing tool for most setups is a portfolio-level cap on net exposure per currency, not just per trade.

So before adding another MM tool I'd fix the anchor (percent off the high-water mark) and add a net-exposure check by currency. Those two do more for real drawdown than any single trailing or partial-close method.

 
What do you mean by high-water-mark?
Matthias 
 
Dr Matthias Hammelsbeck #:
What do you mean by high-water-mark?
Matthias 

Even if a water level only temporarily rises, it leaves a stain behind. Note that Sylvain Christian Mercier said "equity high-water mark..." (emphasis added).

Presumably, that analogizes to Maximal Drawdown:

Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies

What is the difference between Maximal draw down and Relative draw down? Why draw down is different between list and graph?

Eleni Anna Branou, 2020.05.16 10:14


https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/1486


  • Absolute drawdown is the difference between the initial deposit and the smalles value of equity within testing:

    AbsoluteDrawDown = InitialDeposit - MinimalEquity

  • Maximal drawdown is the highest difference between one of local upper extremums of the equity graph and the following lower extremums:

    MaximalDrawDown = Max of (Maximal Peak - next Minimal Peak)

    The basic stages of changing the maximal drawdown value within testing are given in the picture below. The total maximal drawdown value is in the thick arrows.

  • The maximal drawdown percentage shows the ratio between the maximal drawdown and the value of respective local upper extremum (of equity):
MaxDrawDown % = MaxDrawDown / its MaxPeak * 100%
(emphasis added).
 
I'd treat risk management as a separate layer from entry logic. A practical setup is fixed risk per trade, lot size derived from the initial stop, and a hard cap on daily drawdown so one bad session doesn't distort the whole week. For XAUUSD, I also check how the idea behaves when spread widens or execution slows down. If the result changes a lot between live-like spread assumptions and ideal conditions, the money management layer is probably too fragile. The tools I find most useful are: a lot-size calculator, an initial stop-level method, and a simple equity/drawdown monitor. That combination keeps the system focused on survival first, performance second.
New comment