
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You are breaking the logic of your reasoning. According to your logic, you have strategy A and strategy B. If some analysis used in strategy B improves its performance, but there is no such analysis in strategy A, then strategy A is bad.
Or maybe it is not needed in strategy A. They are completely different strategies.
Let's say that
A - strategy with no multicurrency analysis, it means we trade only one pair
Strategy B - the same A, but with elements of multicurrency analysis, respectively, we trade anything
Let's put it this way.
A - strategy with no multicurrency analysis, it means we trade only one pair
Strategy B - the same A, but with elements of multicurrency analysis, respectively, we trade anything
No, not really, A is a strategy, when a group of Expert Advisors is working on one strategy and each on its own symbol. Strategy "A" and strategy "B" have different signal systems.
No, not really, "A" is a strategy where a group of experts work on one strategy and each on a different symbol. However, the signal systems of strategy "A" and strategy "B" are different.
Matthew 6:7
1. irena cannot be right by definition.
2. diversification is always diversification. And what is there to argue about at all...
3."a strategy of choosing only one currency for a particular timeframe" is God level trading. Only there are no gods in the market - no one knows when to switch between assets.
The whole question is capital adequacy - is there enough of a deposit for multi-currency trading
1. irena cannot be right by definition.
2. diversification is always diversification. And what is there to argue about at all...
3."a strategy of choosing only one currency for a particular timeframe" is God-level trading. Only there are no gods in the market - no one knows when to switch between assets.
The whole question is capital adequacy - is there enough of a deposit for multi-currency trading
1. By what definition?
2. Let's say you use a trending TS on one pair - you have a series of profitable and losing trades. If you use the same trend TS on several pairs with LOW CORRELATION LEVEL (modulo), you will "straighten" the balance line. The resonance effect is highly unlikely, although it is possible, but it is more risky to open trades on one pair for the whole cutoff than to wait for this resonance.
3. The concept of a probability model is there. So? And what does this have to do with the TS on one or more pairs? What other competitors....
2. let's say you use a trend TS on one pair - you have a series of profitable and losing trades. If you use the same trend TS on several pairs with LOW CORRELATION LEVEL (modulo), you will "straighten" the balance line. The resonance effect is highly unlikely, although it is possible, but it is more risky to open trades on one pair for the whole cutoff than to wait for this resonance.
3. The concept of a probability model is there. So? And what does this have to do with the TS on one or more pairs? What other competitors....
2. Once again, this is a temporary Illusion. Lazy to argue. I can see that you are at the beginning of your journey. If you have enough time, financial and intellectual resources, you will realize that you were wrong. If you do not have enough, you will remain in this Illusion.
I see.
The sacred knowledge of the great initiates is inaccessible to mere mortals. Just like their signals or PAMM accounts....
P.S. No, it's not mathematically proven. But asset diversification as a method of reducing the risk of an investment portfolio is proven mathematically
I see.
The sacred knowledge of the great initiates is inaccessible to mere mortals. Just like their signals or PAMM accounts....