The history of the Romanov dynasty began and ended with Michaels in the Ipatiev monastery (territorially different monasteries, the name is the same). 300 years.
The history of the Romanov dynasty began and ended with the Mikhail's in Ipatiev Monastery (territorially different monasteries, the name is the same).
Is years a necessary and sufficient condition?
Just look at the beginning of the centuries - what was going on, who gives a shit about the Romanovs?)
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
what's all the fuss about, people?
The pound is selling and it won't go down.)
spit on the wagons)
Just open history and look at the chronology.)
Yep, I'm talking about the wrong story)))))
Anything interesting coming up ?The pound is selling and it won't fucking go down)))
The trick there is that history repeats itself, but not in round (100, 200) years. You have to do the math.
What's all the fuss about, people?
Look it up, at least for a start)))
Okay.
The history of the Romanov dynasty began and ended with Michaels in the Ipatiev monastery (territorially different monasteries, the name is the same). 300 years.
Is years a necessary and sufficient condition?
ps in 1914 all of Europe was already on fire.
OK.
The history of the Romanov dynasty began and ended with the Mikhail's in Ipatiev Monastery (territorially different monasteries, the name is the same).
Is years a necessary and sufficient condition?
Just look at the beginning of the centuries - what was going on, who gives a shit about the Romanovs?)
1614-18, 1710-13, 1812-14, 1905, 1914-18 etc.