gnawingmarket: Lacton, I'm not a far away person, so I don't understand this cartoon. Can you briefly explain wherethe money is that could be taken? Thank you. (chuckles)
The answer is simple - everywhere. What it's for is elementary!
Ishim: The answer is simple - everywhere. The answer is simple - everywhere.
I repeat - the market is initially a lock consisting of a buyer and a seller. randomness is needed here like air, to get a ratio of both 50/50. such a ratio increases spread, turnover and turnover.
Lacton, I'm not a far away person, so I don't understand this cartoon. Can you briefly explain wherethe money is that could be taken? Thank you. (chuckles)
The answer is simple - everywhere. The answer is simple - everywhere.
The answer is simple - everywhere. What is it for - elementary!
money everywhere is far from everyone's money... tumblers - the discretisation seems cooler than ticks, but you can't take the money...
Entering on higherframes is not better either - just more time to think about your own insignificance...
arbitrage - there's nowhere for mere mortals to catch...
conclusion - there's something averaging... the possibility of giving the entrant not to fall immediately and at least on b.u. to replay repeatedly...
money everywhere is far from everyone's money... tumblers - the discretisation seems cooler than ticks, but you can't take the money...
Entering on higherframes is not better either - just more time to think about your insignificance...
arbitrage - there's nowhere and nothing for mere mortals to catch...
conclusion - there's something averaging... the possibility of giving the entrant not to fall immediately and at least on b.u. to replay repeatedly...
Zorich about the first - I agree, this is the more frequent mistake in essence, leading to the result on my post above.
As for the second line - the presence of TF is an indicator of price behaviour history, there is nothing else interesting about it
On the third line - sure
On the fourth - the averaging is some chance to either correct the error or to lose
Zorich about the first one - I agree, it is the more frequent mistake in fact, leading to the result of my post above.
On the second line - the presence of a TF is an indicator of the history of price behaviour, there is nothing else interesting about it
On the third line - sure
For the fourth - the averaging is a certain chance to either correct an error or to lose
and again, having secured all the risks we come to 50/50....
are we playing roulette for years... ?...
averaging:
and again, having secured all the risks, we arrive at 50-50....
have we been playing roulette for years... ?...
yes. Betting brings that ratio closer to parity.
I am of the opinion that until you understand the physical meaning of forex there is no point in trading with real money.
averaging:
remove the bottom red one and you're done.
the rules say three entrances.
and done...