Interesting and Humour - page 3943
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, the motherland is in danger, and we're just boring, mouthing off, trading slack-jawed. It's urgent to figure out how much will save the motherland - and trade the right amount
No way, there's a man up there with a cudgel and he's watching.)
There's a professional Russophobe troll on the site: he posts another load of crap that goes into a search engine. There is already a public source of fact - Tolstoy is a cosmopolitan.
And the fact that Tolstoy had NOTHING to do with cosmopolitanism, moreover, his novelWar and Peace is a nationalist work of genius.
His novel is built on the opposition between the Russian world and the non-Russian world.Tolstoy loves the Russian world and Russian heroes, Tolstoy hates the non-Russian world and Russian cosmopolitans. He hates and mocks Napoleon; he dislikes the cosmopolitan Alexander I and is quite ironic about him. Tolstoy ridicules the French and the Germans, he is ruthless even towards minor characters. Such as the officer Berg, or m-lle Bourinne, who lives in the Bolkonsky family.
But let's be honest: it's completely uncharacteristic of the world's geniuses to write nationalistic novels. What gave rise to such a novel?
It's quite simple. The young Leo Tolstoy serves in the army, first in the Caucasus, recall that at that time there was a war with the mountaineers, then he takes part in the Crimean War, during the defense of Sevastopol, he is an artillery officer. Theyoung patriot Tolstoy understands that it was not the army that lost the war, but the cosmopolitan regime established by NicholasI. Like any honestly fighting soldier who has had his victory taken away from him, Tolstoy is truly furious. Being an excellent analyst, he even writes a note about defeat in the war. The diagnosis is clear to him.
And he turns to another European invasion of Russia, which took place in 1812. Things were much more dangerous then. The European army was huge, led by a military genius, but they won then, and lost during the Crimean War. What is the reason?
The answer is simple.Russian nationalism then withstood the onslaught of European chauvinism. Russians got a national leader - Kutuzov. The cosmopolitan regime of Alexander I in the face of destruction made concessions.
But the fake is launched and ready to be replicated, and the source of this fake is a completely neutral website.
Be careful when driving at a green light, tanks are not afraid of mud.
Oops... wow!
There was also another view [of cosmopolitanism], of which Leo Tolstoy was a famous spokesman. According to this concept , patriotism is a relic of barbaric times, an evil that inevitably leads to aggression and enmity:
Explain that to every American who hoists an American flag on the flagpole outside his home).
Please ask Leo Tolstoy.
That man with the stick has been under control for a long time. And the baton is telecommanded.
Please refer to Lev Nikolayev Tolstoy.
The man with the truncheon has been under control for a long time. And the stick is telecommanded.
Well, then you don't need to trade if the man is in control.
It's about giving the appearance of naturalness
Attention all members of the community!
Any political posts which provoke the participants of the thread into mutual arguments and insults will be banned for a week. This applies in the first instance to attacks/mockery on national and territorial grounds. Discussion of historical facts in favour of this or that country/people, under the guise of objectivity, will also be purged.
Anyone who joins in the discussion of such provocative posts will be banned, no matter what you write in response to such a post. We are forced to take such measures to maintain order in the thread.