10points 3.mq4 - page 199

 

david

david

first of all thanks for replying..

secong my reason is that im using that EA with low TP only 5 pips so when i win this 5 pip this EA trade again quickly and then win and then trade again quickly and so on ..so i jut want it to trade only twice a day so i can test it in the way that i think is profitable for me so i will share my thought with u guys....thanks

 

shit

because it and therefore shit when she answers, feels Jesus in earth

by shit

davidke20:
1st of all, you need to give your reason

2ndly, you need to give the parameter

3rd wise, you need to give some forward test result. Turn it off manually, and turn it back on twice a day is not a hard job. I'm sure coding is much more brain cell killing then clicking the mouse.

The fastest way to modify an EA without any of the above hassle, commecial section you can find the sticky post on the top, by Optimu. That will only cost you 50 bucks. No question ask. 1 day complete. Cheers

Regards

David
 

I have test 3 Versions from 10 points with different settings

10 PointsDynamic Stop Settings M30:

TakeProfit=10.00000000

Lots=0.10000000

InitialStop=1.00000000

TrailingStop=1.00000000

MaxTrades=5

Pips=5

SecureProfit=10

AccountProtection=1

OrderstoProtect=3

ReverseCondition=0

EURUSDPipValue=10.00000000

GBPUSDPipValue=10.00000000

USDCHFPipValue=10.00000000

USDJPYPipValue=9.71500000

StartYear=2005

StartMonth=1

EndYear=2009

EndMonth=12

EndHour=22

EndMinute=30

mm=0

risk=1

AccountisNormal=1

Magic=10201

10 PointsDynamic Stop RMI Settings M30:

TakeProfit=40.00000000

Lots=0.10000000

InitialStop=55.00000000

TrailingStop=20.00000000

MaxTrades=5

Pips=4

SecureProfit=50

AccountProtection=1

OrderstoProtect=3

ReverseCondition=0

EURUSDPipValue=10.00000000

GBPUSDPipValue=10.00000000

USDCHFPipValue=10.00000000

USDJPYPipValue=9.71500000

StartYear=2005

StartMonth=1

EndYear=2050

EndMonth=12

EndHour=22

EndMinute=30

mm=0

risk=12

AccountisNormal=0

MACD_fast_ema_period=14.00000000

MACD_slow_ema_period=26.00000000

timeperiod=240.00000000

timeperiod2=30.00000000

Par=10.00000000

CountBars=300.00000000

Length=14.00000000

Length2=7.00000000

Smooth=5.00000000

MASmooth=0.00000000

RMIPeriod=14.00000000

MomPeriod=5.00000000

Magic=10201

10 Points mod1e M30:

BlockId=1

TakeProfit=20

Step=18

MoneyManagment=28

Lots=0.10000000

PricePlus=0.00140000

Manual=off

OpenBlock=1

ModifyBlock=0

FixLot=0

MicroLot=0

MaxiLot=0

Insure=9

BlockOrders=4

StopLoss=100

fema=14.00000000

sema=40.00000000

sig=8.00000000

cciperiod=14.00000000

timeperiod=60.00000000

timeperiod1=30.00000000

I Like RMI it opens most time valid trades dont use martingale very much

Greetz

 
salamdo:
david

first of all thanks for replying..

secong my reason is that im using that EA with low TP only 5 pips so when i win this 5 pip this EA trade again quickly and then win and then trade again quickly and so on ..so i jut want it to trade only twice a day so i can test it in the way that i think is profitable for me so i will share my thought with u guys....thanks

Great. Then you should start work on it. Dont wait for me to lay the ground for you. Do it on a consistant basis. Start your EA. After closure, stop the EA. Everyday 2 time. Not a hassle for you, right? Cheers

Regards

David

 

david again

ehehe...if i should wait this EA 24/5 to stop its trading ..so i dont need to use EAs from the first place and i should work manually ...and thats not the point ..but thanks for giving me some time to reply my freind..

 

V12

Ok, I have 1 vote out of 30.

About the new project. It will be not profitable as V12. Why I still develope tonnes of new project if they cant compare with V12? It is because I like angel rather than beast. I've done something new rather then a beast. As V12 named. Its an American Muscle. Great horse power. Great sprint. Quater miles in 8 seconds. But it cant pull a single corner. It will crash and burn. I dont like the way it handle trades. It blow up my backtest in the 1st week. I wonder how it can survive in the forward test. Therefor I made another system based on V11(the previous version before I make V12, V11 is currently running on my live account). That has no loss at 2006. Less trade, less return. But trading on a safer manner. It only generate about 600% over the year. Therefor, not seeing it too profitable and less expectation about it. But I'm seriously consider to put it on one of my live account to portfolio my own fund.

Regards

David

David make that 2 out of 30, need a safer EA one that will not blow my micromini account, not that V12 is not a great EA just a little dangerous for a small account(just my opinion), any help in this I am willing to provide.By the way this weeks results the V12 STILL humming along quite well.Started $5000 demo 3/6/07 now the bal. a little over 8000.No complaints here!

tools

 
davidke20:
Therefor I made another system based on V11(the previous version before I make V12, V11 is currently running on my live account). That has no loss at 2006. Less trade, less return. But trading on a safer manner. It only generate about 600% over the year.

Beats the building society . Anything that is safe, that can make that sort of return is certainly worth exploring.

V12 is running great, but I can see the risk. I'm curious, though, how you plan to offset that risk. I know you've been talking about hedging .. but how does that work?

Regards,

Ray.

 

New V11

The V12 came about when a modification to V1.1 was made and V12 had a better ring to it than V1.2 as we found out when the . was omitted by accident.

The V12 has performed very well and has been found by the testers including my own testing that it is risky. It hasn't caused a MaxTrades loss yet in my testing but the way it moves suggests that it could at any time.

I am sure that every tester will agree that it is too risky to use on a large live account, my increase from $19000 up to $118134 would be definitely too risky and at one time I ran the risk of losing it all before I dropped the Risk Factor from 12 to 4.

Everyone would rather see an EA that would perform at 25% month profit continuously month in and month out. So my vote would be bring it on. The rules should be posted prominantly and those reporting outside those rules should be referred back to the post #. The ability to perform on mini accounts is crucial most of us would want an EA that can progress from a mini account from it's own results.

So my vote will be either request new testers or take those who have expressed interest here in this thread.

Over to you David.

John

 
yeoeleven:
Everyone would rather see an EA that would perform at 25% month profit continuously month in and month out. So my vote would be bring it on.

I agree entirely

Make that 4 out of 30.

 

A preview of the new RB26DETT, based on V1.1. Not Vantage. Because the BiPolar mode canot get a proper solution on unhedge. I made a mistake, according to the backtest, it shows not 600%, its 6000%. Mate, its only 6000% on the backtest. I really not putting much hope on it.

Regards

David

Files:
Reason: