Iron Stops

I've tested the EA a bit now, and I'm quite pleasantly surprised....

I've been trading with EAs since 2021 and I coded some myself. By pure luck, I fell on Iron Stop and purchased the EA 3 weeks from now after doing backtest with the demo as I was skeptical. After doing test on 3 different broker and having the same results on years of backtest, I decided to start the EA on my personal account and prop firm account on august 30 2026. So far, for 3 weeks, all live trades match the backtest on my personnal account (IC Market). At the end of each week, I backtest the week to see if the trades match and they are. For my prop account, the live trades are exactly the same as my personnal account, but the backtest of the prop account is not TOTALLY accurate (probably something to do with the data of the broker, some trades on the backtest hit SL but the live trades hit TP), but the important thing is that the live trades of the prop account match exactly at 100% my live trades on my personnal account, which match the backtest accurately. It's a new EA so I'm optimistic with the results so far, but I manage my expectation in case something goes bad and not be disapointed. I really recommend this EA and people can DM me if they want proof I will be glad to help you!! :)

Bad. Just bad same with the other EA. The losses are big. The author sells it at Promo price then Run off with our money. As the other users mentioned deceptive behavior, will not by from this Author again.

its good EA ,trading style good,i am use this EA,good perform result are too good

This Review is based on Backtesting & Demo Trading Results So far the ea is performing well so far all wins since last thursday with 1 open trade at the moment in a small drawdown that is to be expected im very positive about this ea and expect to go live within the next couple of weeks checkout the comments section for my ongoing results

I don't understand the complaints in these comments. I've been using it on a real account for three days—and so far, all my trades have been profitable. I started testing it last week on a cent account, and it also worked and made a profit. True, it hit one stop-loss (SL), but the results match the backtests. I rate this EA very positively—if it keeps getting results like this, it will be my best EA.And as for the gifts — I didn't buy this EA for a gift. True, I received it, but in the backtests this free EA didn't work at all, so I'm not using it. I'm not writing this review because of the gift, but because of the results I've achieved on a real account.

I purchased the EA last week, and it's working really well — my stress level should now be reduced

.

seller asked me to put a good review for free ea's, i will give my honest opinion. i have used the ea couple of weeks in my live account and im in loss. the backtest completly doesnt reflect in live trading. i think the backtest is manipulated and his live signall is offline after terrible results in september. beware of this scammer dont buy his ea, everything is manipulated.

i haven been using the EA for a very long time, but so far the results have been good. I get more wins than loss and the profits are enough to cover the one loss.

I have seen many comments regarding this EA and have even had unsolicited contacts warning me off. I admit, I do not understand much of how the EA is structured and there are questions regarding the back tests, the forward projected trade times and the lot sizing, but I also don't understand how my iphone does everything it does, I just use it and it works. It's the same with Iron Stops, so far 9 trades, 8 wins and good profits. That's what I judge it on. I will post a screen shot of my Iron Stops trades in the comments section as I can't add that here. Judge for yourself.

Just as an update. I see on here people giving zero stars and complaining about it being a losing EA. Well, either your setup is wrong, your broker is wrong or you're just throwing shade for some personal reason, because I've had 13 trades / 12 wins in the few weeks I've been using it. So which is it guys? Why don't you publish your trades and show us how it is losing for you but winning or the rest of us?

I have been running this EA for a week and can confidently say that Live Account trading perfectly matches the back test for that same period. The matching of time of trade entry and s/l and t/p values are consistent and precise to the cents. This tells me that a Back Tests for any other periods are also accurate. Although I have noticed one small deviation and I am still not sure about the cause of it, up until yesterday all trades on live account match trades i can see on Back Test for that same period of time, but yesterday there was a trade which does show up on the Back Test but did not happen on any of my 5 real accounts which I run in parallel on 5 different VPS all with slightly different risk configurations. From the extensive Back Testing I did so far (more than 100 different Back Tests) I have seen that for small accounts of 100 - 500 dollars the "Risk base on balance percent" is more efficient than manually configuring the "a specific lot size", but the is an issue i have noticed while Back Testing the "Risk base on balance percent", which is once the balance grows to 500,000+ and the lot size becomes more than 60 lots, the trades become less frequent to the point when trading almost halts when balance grows to 1-2 million dollars. It seams that there is a risk logic in the EA which starts to think that the risk is to extreme for EA to enter trades with large lot sizes on the "Risk base on balance percent" configuration. Depending on the month for example January 2026 all the way to April 2026 EA showed extremely positive results on initial balance of 500 dollars, while May 2026 Back Test showed only 10%, 20% and 40% configurations making some profit and the 30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% configurations completely burned the 500 dollar deposits. Therefore, from what I could see so far, it shows that EA is very much capable to turn 500 in to 1m within a month or two on "Risk base on balance percent" of 50% or more, but you need to be lucky in term of when you initiate the start of EA trading. For myself I have created 5 isolated accounts each running Iron Stops with identical configurations with the only difference being the risk percent. One of the live accounts runs at 10% risk, the other runs at 30%, then there are also 50%, 70% and 90% risk configurations on different accounts each having 500 dollar deposits. If the month of September will prove to be a bad month, no big deal, I will simply reload all account with another 500 dollars and run then for the month of October. If I manage to turn 500 in to at least 100k I will then change the configuration to the "a specific lot size" of 10 lots and increase to 20 lots once the balance goes above 300k. I really don't understand the heaters in the comments as if this EA should be a 100% guaranteed winner. No it's not, but the consistency and the overall win rate on the Back Tests are more than good enough for me personally to run this EA on 5 real accounts with different risk configurations, some of which might get liquidated while some will survive with a profit. Even if all 5 accounts will be liquidated by end of September, no big deal, I will simply reload and see what October will bring. Remember, this is my personal opinion / EA use Strategy from the observations I made, THIS IS NOT A FINANCIAL ADVISE, trading is always a gamble, therefore don't play this game with money you are not ready to lose. You cant make profits without taking risks and the profit you make is always proportionate to the risk you are ready to take. "The one who doesn't risk, Doesn't drink champagne"

I want REFUND because I don't see any logic behind the trade entries. The EA trades quite randomly day before yesterday it opened a trade below swing high counter trend price reveresed hard and hit an SL of 50 USD. Yesterday trade was opened right in resistance area with an SL around 65 USD, which is still running after a day. It trades quite randomly with wide SLs to give big room to possibly get TP. PS: many positive reviews are because of free EA gift offered with review.

I've been using Iron Stops and I'm really happy with the results so far. The EA trades well and has been performing consistently for me. What I also really appreciate is the seller's support - whenever I have a question or need help, he is always friendly, helpful, and quick to respond. Overall, a great EA with excellent customer support. Definetely reccomend it!

I bought this EA a few days ago, but I can say that I've only had one stop-loss, and then all take-profit hits, so so far everything's okay.

I’ve been using this EA for almost three weeks now. So far, the profits and losses have basically canceled each other out, and my account is currently slightly negative. The backtest showed a very attractive and smooth equity curve, but the actual forward performance has been completely different. In real trading, the EA has shown no meaningful profitability at all. Based on my experience so far, this EA has been useless for generating consistent profits. The backtest created very different expectations from what I actually experienced in live/forward trading. I would not recommend spending your money or time on this EA.

This EA is currently exhibiting deceptive behavior, so I have decided to stop using it. The signal itself hasn't even been running for three months, yet the developer has already made over ten thousand dollars. The current profit-to-loss ratio is very low; proceed with caution.

**Disappointing Results After 2 Weeks** Unfortunately, after approximately two weeks since purchasing **Iron Stops**, I decided to disable it on my real account. The EA executes trades normally; however, so far, the losses have been slightly larger than the profits. The overall result is negative and, in practice, the performance has been close to break-even. This means that the capital remains invested and exposed to the market without generating enough return to justify continuing to use the EA on a real account at this time. I have also been following the **$100,000 real account** presented as a reference. After my own experience, I have some doubts about how accurately this account represents the results that a buyer can realistically expect to achieve. For me, it is important that the results presented are reasonably consistent with what customers are able to reproduce after purchasing the EA. I will continue to follow future updates and plan to keep the EA running on a **demo account** to see whether its performance improves before considering using it again on a real account. As an additional observation, I also purchased another EA from the same developer, **Silent Exit**, and unfortunately I also had to disable it because the results I obtained did not match the expectations created by the backtests. This review reflects only my personal experience so far. If future updates improve the results, I will be happy to update my review accordingly.

History reader with hardcoded scheduled trades. Stay away.

The SL for each trade is set relatively far compared to the TP, and in some trades, the SL is several times larger than the TP, which makes me quite concerned. However, when looking at the one-month backtest results, the number of profitable trades is significantly higher than the number of losing trades. As a result, the overall performance for the month is still profitable.