Looking for patterns - page 183
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Drawdowns can be linked to drawdowns, not to entry, or exit. Usually, with not exiting on time. Bought at 1.2, fell to 0.9 and I'm still sitting.
Right, right...
You enter and exit the market like that or on a dime, and you do not decide anything on the market, and you do not even think.... , and the drawdowns are formed without your participation, because you are nobody...
HILARIOUS!
When we enter, we think we have entered well, but the market maker thinks differently and you get a conflict of interest.))
Quite right, where price passes the plot quickly is momentum, but not a trend.
You don't have to make up entities. "Impulse" is also a trend (directional price movement) It just looks different on a chart with uniform astronomical time, often taking up a single candle. Or even a gap. In principle, just like a "gap", which many people also separate into an "entity". It is also a trend :) But it is fast, the quotes resolution is not enough, the chart is always discrete, and the process is going "between the ticks".
But these are display problems and that's all. On my chart with the tricky "X" axis trends lasting hours and days and impulses of a couple of minutes and even "gaps" look the same. Because it's essentially the same thing - the price moves in a certain direction, just the speed at different times of the process is different.
P.S.
It is very important to understand all this in details, sifting out unnecessary things and combining the rest. You can make up all this stuff, gaps and impulses. There are enough problems here without redundant entities.
There is no need to create entities. "Impulse" is also a trend (directional price movement) It just looks different on a chart with a uniform astronomical time frame, often taking up a single candle. Or even a gap. In principle, just like a "gap", which many people also separate into an "entity". It is also a trend :) But it is fast, the quotes resolution is not enough, the chart is always discrete, and the process is going "between the ticks".
But these are display problems and that's all. On my chart with the tricky "X" axis trends lasting hours and days and impulses of a couple of minutes and even "gaps" look the same. Because it's essentially the same thing - the price moves in a certain direction, just the speed at different times of the process is different.
P.S.
It is very important to understand all this in details, sifting out unnecessary things and combining the rest. You can make up all this stuff, gaps and impulses. We have enough problems here without extra entities.
A trend consists of alternating impulses and corrections, that's why it is not quite correct to consider an impulse a trend too. The correct interpretation is as follows: an impulse is a segment of a trend with a pronounced unidirectional movement coinciding with the direction of the trend. IMHO.
95% only see the previous price. This will be true.
There is no need to create entities. "Impulse" is also a trend (directional price movement) It just looks different on a chart with a uniform astronomical time frame, often taking up a single candle. Or even a gap. In principle, just like a "gap", which many people also separate into an "entity". It is also a trend :) But it is fast, the quotes resolution is not enough, the chart is always discrete, and the process is going "between the ticks".
But these are display problems and that's all. On my chart with the tricky "X" axis trends lasting hours and days and impulses of a couple of minutes and even "gaps" look the same. Because it's essentially the same thing - the price moves in a certain direction, just the speed at different times of the process is different.
P.S.
It is very important to understand all this in details, sifting out unnecessary things and combining the rest. You can make up all this stuff, gaps and impulses. There are enough problems here without redundant entities.
And how to see the future price, if you don't use mushrooms and shamanistic rituals? :)
The future price depends on the past price.
A trader, like a chess player, must see moves several steps ahead.
This requires experience and ability. 95% of amateurs lose to 5% of pros.
The future price depends on the past price.
A trader, like a chess player, must see moves several steps ahead.
This requires experience and ability. 95% of amateurs lose to 5% of pros.