
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's not a bad idea - you make a prediction in one direction, open a demo deal in the other, and go full steam ahead. If the forecast is correct - you are a cool analyst! If not - you are a cool trader!
Recently on this account floating losses on open positions 321477 and 321482 exceeded 30% of balance
Nothing has dropped from the initial deposit in a short period of time.
If so, the question is simple: will it be the MC or the closing signal sooner?
That's how the market has to change for the MC to come before the signal???
Floating loss is already up to 10K or 50% of balance, no signal yet :(
And most likely there won't be, most likely positions will close at the TP.
Floating loss already up to 10K or 50% of balance, no signal yet :(
Imagine the preinfarction state of the investor and his hired thugs at your doorstep. Can you imagine? - Take the ad down)
There's not even much to say... :)
This is the account with login 11052. Ahh, can not understand a simple idea: if the system does not have a reasonable stop loss, then the system must be stopped immediately!
If you have any trading experience, you should know that lots of times, losing lots will result in a bigger loss than closing a losing position by a trading signal.
I don't have much experience in real trading (also with overshooting), but that was enough for me to equate a large drawdown with an actual loss, because such an event is bound to happen (in your case, Victor, it will be an MC).
The absence of a stop in the system, allegedly motivated by the expectation of a contrary signal coming in the future, always tells me only one thing: the system builder failed when trying to build a stop in the system and put up with large and uncontrollable drawdowns. Meanwhile, stop-loss is supposed to be a natural part of the system, not something incidental and unpleasant.
I don't have much experience in real trading (also with overshooting), but that was enough for me to equate a large drawdown with an actual loss, because such an event is bound to happen (in your case, Victor, it will be an MC).
The absence of a stop in the system, allegedly motivated by the expectation of a contrary signal coming in the future, always tells me only one thing: the system builder failed when trying to build a stop in the system and put up with large and uncontrollable drawdowns. Meanwhile, stop-loss is supposed to be a natural part of the system, not something incidental and unpleasant.
Then you better not bother looking for an investor - to avoid potential hassle. You accumulate the money yourself, and then the question of the investor will disappear by itself.
P.S. Just remember to stop trading in time - just before the deal, which should happen MK ...
I don't pretend to admit it, but all the positions have closed on TA - that's a fact!
Here are the very trades in the pictures:
Yes, both closed at TP, but at the cost of what drawdowns...
Added third Expert Advisor, same logic as second one, indicator is different.
Login: 11133 Password: 0hvzspy Server: 207. 228.236. 15:443
Statment: http://www.investmoney.kiev.ua/
Here are the very trades in the pictures:
Yes, both closed on TP, but at the cost of what drawdowns...
Thanks for the analysis, don't forget to pay attention to longer periods from 4 hours to a month... Equity drawdowns up to 50% due to high risk, but not fatal...
Working :)