FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2015 - page 174

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
last screenshot from Bicus)))
As they say - the story for the indicator is not relevant....
And in general the professor is dotting the depo easily, so it could very well be that the indictor is not bad.
There's a pound.
the link? the link is in the post, click it. don't take it at face value. it was a joke.
Yes yes, I appreciate it ))) thought you made a mistake by accident.
that's what i meant, so you don't have to run too far while it's fresh in your mind.
yes yes, i did )) thought you made a mistake.
I don't use indicators for a long time, so it's hard for me to understand them at all. in short, how do i evaluate an indicator from the point of view of its applicability to the real world?
1. stable signal
2. it works on bar open price
3. has no input parameters
I don't use indicators for a long time, so it's hard for me to understand anything about them. in short, how do you evaluate an indicator in terms of its applicability to real life?
1. stable signal
2. it works by the bar opening price
3. has no input parameters
I'm like a dog here )) in this indicator it is not clear what data it takes in general, the phrase " the principle of an impenetrable machine" does not tell me anything ))
it's the latest know-how.) (lying, but it's possible)
So, Rena, is it like that?
it's the latest know-how. it's only here))) (lie, but quite possible)
I'm like a dog in this)) in this indicator it's not clear what data it takes in general, the phrase "the principle of an unbreakable wagon" doesn't mean anything to me))
... because the info hasn't changed for 2 days, thought it didn't show. ...