A clause is a clause. There's no need to spoil it. It's good as it is. It is up to everyone to decide how to look at it.
Pips can be a losing trade, money a profitable one, etc.
The understanding of a pip as a minimum change in price is not exactly what we want to see. And this comes from the logic of programming, not from the real trading business.
zfs: There's an understanding of the point as a minimum price change, and it's not exactly what we would like to see. And this comes from the logic of programming, not from the real trading.
The message I would like to see is a dead one. As many forum members as there are opinions on what you would like to see.
Take the item as it is and do with it what you want.
The message I would like to see is a dead one. As many forum members as there are opinions on what you would like to see.
Take it as it is and do with it what you want.
I am a person who is not particularly interested, but if you want to do it properly, you'd better do it well.) As for the MICEX index, in Metatrader it has 2 digits, but in fact they say that the index has 1400 points and not 140,000. Because there is no connection between the point and the minimum price change. Another thing is that it's hard to deal with it).
TheXpert: It's a martin. The first option. The second one is arbitrage on similar instruments with different pips. In any case the statistics in pips is useful.
No, the volumes were tied to the strength of the "signal", the result is a joke.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
A clause is a clause. There's no need to spoil it. It's good as it is. It is up to everyone to decide how to look at it.
Pips can be a losing trade, money a profitable one, etc.
A clause is a clause. There's no need to spoil it. It's good as it is. It is up to everyone to decide how to look at it.
Pips can be a losing trade, money a profitable one, etc.
There's an understanding of the point as a minimum price change, and it's not exactly what we would like to see. And this comes from the logic of programming, not from the real trading.
The message I would like to see is a dead one. As many forum members as there are opinions on what you would like to see.
Take the item as it is and do with it what you want.
The message I would like to see is a dead one. As many forum members as there are opinions on what you would like to see.
Take it as it is and do with it what you want.
This is a suggestion for the Signals service, not a meeting about "what to do about what".
You're like the Chukcha with the song "What I see is what I sing."
No, there's been a meeting about what to do with what.
The message I would like to see is a dead one. As many forum members as there are opinions on what you would like to see.
Take it as it is and do with it what you want.
I am a person who is not particularly interested, but if you want to do it properly, you'd better do it well.) As for the MICEX index, in Metatrader it has 2 digits, but in fact they say that the index has 1400 points and not 140,000. Because there is no connection between the point and the minimum price change. Another thing is that it's hard to deal with it).
In pips it can be a losing trade, in money a profitable one, etc.
It's a martin. The first option. The second one is arbitrage on similar instruments with different pips. In any case the statistics in pips is useful.
No, the volumes were tied to the strength of the "signal", the result is a joke.
Of course the stats in pips are useful.
Partial closing of large orders on profit can put points on )