Who has already tried the Signals subscription to get on the tail of ATC 2012 participants? - page 54
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Can we at least get some arguments. Otherwise it all boils down to - nonsense, classified information, discussed 1000 times.
This is your real market, a real broker who personally for a particular client introduces a manual delay. In order to buy before him at a better price. So he is not a broker, he is a dealer.
To buy before he does at a better price.
That's hilarious.)
...demonstrating the amazing depth of your knowledge - "I don't know what's right, but you're doing it backwards."
It has long been of no interest to anybody, this news has faded away several years ago, and you are still running around with it like a chicken with an egg and with the kind of mission like opening people's eyes.
You are a demo trader, so you have nothing to lose. If the DC can change any trading history and is the only one who knows about your trades. Then at any time, they can provide you with a statement that you lost everything and no one will ever prove what was wrong.
As long as trades are not cleared by an accredited clearing centre, their veracity is not confirmed, which means that the capital is at the will of brokerage companies.
I understand that it does not matter what the legal status of your transactions is when you are taking a paycheck for paycheck.
This is your real market, a real broker who personally for a particular client introduces a manual delay. In order to buy ahead of him at a better price. So he's not a broker, he's a dealer.
You are a demo trader, so you have nothing to lose. If the DC can change any trading history and is the only one who knows about your trades. Then at any time, they can provide you with a statement that you lost everything and no one will ever prove what was wrong.
As long as trades are not cleared by an accredited clearing centre, their veracity is not confirmed, which means that the capital is at the will of brokerage companies.
I understand that when you are leaking wage after wage it does not matter what is the legal status of your transactions.
If you are not satisfied with this or that contract, the market will fall under the influence of the broker who will give you the capital.
If you are not satisfied with the contract, then why did you sign it, if you are not satisfied with the performance of the contract from the docs, it is YOUR ONLY AND YOUR ONLY problems.
You ordered a kitchen, full stuffing, turnkey. Delivered, installed. You are not satisfied. Who will you write to? The furniture company or software that wrote the software for the layout and calculation, or the suppliers of the machines?
There is no doubt that MT5 is the best software for testing algo strategies. But since in MT5 you can not download third party quotes, and built-in from brokerage companies are smoothed and extremely limited (MK has so far made do with paper releases that it is possible to work with exchanges, but no real transactions from clients yet), its value as a result falls heavily, even compared to MT4, which can be used as an analytical core, getting data from exchange terminal, processing and sending orders to the exchange terminal.
And brokers... Go to any exchange in the relevant section and choose whatever you like. For example:
http://www.cmegroup.com/tools-information/find-a-broker/broker-directory-na.html
http://www.micex.ru/markets/stock/members/list
Any client of a real broker, not a kitchen, has 2 accounts - money deposited in clearing and a securities account maintained by a company with an appropriate license. At any given time, it is possible to prove judicially how much money the client has and what assets in securities he has in his possession. In other words, the risk of losing hard cash is reduced to zero (very close).
First you voice your complaints to a particular brokerage house with whom you have entered into this or that agreement in one form or another.
If you are not satisfied with the contract, then why did you sign it, if you are not satisfied with the performance of the contract from the docs, it is YOUR ONLY AND YOUR ONLY problems.
You ordered a turnkey kitchen, full set of furniture. Delivered, installed. You are not satisfied. Who will you write to? The furniture company or software that wrote the software for the layout and calculation, or the suppliers of the machines?
A demo trader for sure. :)
Have you ever traded on the real? Have you ever had any real problems?
Do you really believe that a broker always respects the contract and everything is always the trader's fault? :)
First you voice your complaints to a particular brokerage house with whom you have entered into this or that agreement in one form or another.
If you are not satisfied with the contract, then why did you sign it, if you are not satisfied with the performance of the contract from the docs, it is YOUR ONLY AND YOUR ONLY problems.
You ordered a turnkey kitchen, full set of furniture. Delivered, installed. You are not satisfied. Who will you write to? The furniture company or software that wrote the software for the layout and calculation, or the suppliers of the machines?
Definitely a demo trader. :)
Have you ever traded live? Have you ever had any real problems?
Do you really believe that a broker always respects the contract and everything is always the trader's fault? :)