You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Very interesting))) what does he do there?
Certainly not by discussing politics in the Interesting and Humorous section.
It's more interesting not "what" but"how".
))) OK, I'll tell you:
This data you publish is the official USSR census data.
And the funny thing is that thecensus data on the total population of the country was artificially increased in 1939 by 3-4 million people.
The word "repressions" is very convenient - you say it and after that you can write any fantasy, just from rubbish.
If about the census, the word "repressions" and the real facts completely hide the facts of blatant incompetence in the field of population accounting. And this was clear as early as the early 30s. All this was exacerbated by the realities of life. The census itself was poorly conducted with very large non-recording of the population. Added to this was the lack of real accounting before that. So the year before this was criminalised for not reporting births and deaths.
Reconstruction was attempted on this census. Here is the result:
Population of the USSR in 1927-1939.
Years
Population at beginning of year (mln.)
Difference
according to published data
as calculated
1927
147,0*
148,7
-1,7
1928
150,4
151,6
-1,2
1929
154,2
154,7
-0,5
1930
157,4
157,4
0
1931
160,4
159,8
0,6
1932
163,2
161,9
1,3
1933
165,7
162,9
2,8
1934
168,0
156,8
11,2
1935
-
158,2
-
1936
-
160,1
-
1937
170,0
161,5
8,5
1938
-
165,5
-
1939
170,6
168,5
2,1
СанСаныч Фоменко:
...
The census itself was poorly conducted with a very large undercount of the population.
...That's not going to happen.
"InRussia, in four years' time, to identify oneself in the electronic census form, one will only have to enter an insurance number of an individual personal account (SNILS). To do this, one will have to register on a federal public services portal."
The word "repressions" is very convenient - you say it and after that you can write any fantasy you want, just out of the blue.
If it is about the census, the word "repressions" and the real facts completely hide the facts of blatant incompetence in the field of population accounting. And this was clear as early as the early 30s. All this was exacerbated by the realities of life. The census itself was poorly conducted with very large non-recording of the population. Added to this was the lack of real accounting before that. So the year before this was criminalised for not reporting births and deaths.
Reconstruction was attempted on this census. Here is the result:
Population of the USSR in 1927-1939.
Years
Population at beginning of year (mln.)
Difference
according to published data
as calculated
1927
147,0*
148,7
-1,7
1928
150,4
151,6
-1,2
1929
154,2
154,7
-0,5
1930
157,4
157,4
0
1931
160,4
159,8
0,6
1932
163,2
161,9
1,3
1933
165,7
162,9
2,8
1934
168,0
156,8
11,2
1935
-
158,2
-
1936
-
160,1
-
1937
170,0
161,5
8,5
1938
-
165,5
-
1939
170,6
168,5
2,1
Absolutely agree - pests, Honduran intelligence spies and enemies of the people!
info 100%!
p.s. Those aren't my numbers, but you're still insane.
P.p.s. What are those 3-4 million people anyway! Enemies of the people...
By the way, since the word repression does not exist in the Criminal Code I propose that the word be considered malicious and non-existent.
And what is it, San Sanych, that you are trying to disprove the existence of repression with census data?
It is you who are here trying to smear ALL the country and 90% of the population of a great country with the word "repression".
Why don't you look into improving this area in other, more beloved countries, like the USA... or somewhere else.
And do not disturb other people, who want to get to the bottom of what was going on in the 30s, who want to understand how they managed to increase production for 10 years by 8.5 times, how they managed to increase arms production by 80 times, how they managed to teach literacy to half of the population of the country.... And all this was done without "partners", without "foreign investors", without a "favourable investment climate".
How?
That is what interests me, not the squabbles among the Soviet nomenclature of the 30s, which the descendants of defeated fighters for nomenclature happiness hide under the word "repression".
PS
I do not hope that you both will forget the word 'repressions' and a whole series of events that had no impact on the course of the country and start to get to the bottom of what was going on in the 30s - zombified by a few words, you pronounce them and seemingly reasonable people start talking nonsense.
I am writing for others who are sane and thinking.
It is you who are here trying to smear ALL the country and 90% of the population of a great country with the word "repression".
Why don't you look into improving this area in other, more beloved countries, like the USA... or somewhere else.
And do not disturb other people, who want to get to the bottom of what was going on in the 30s, who want to understand how they managed to increase production for 10 years by 8.5 times, how they managed to increase arms production by 80 times, how they managed to teach literacy to half of the population of the country.... And all this was done without "partners", without "foreign investors", without a "favourable investment climate".
How?
That is what interests me, not the squabbles among the Soviet nomenclature of the 30s, which the descendants of defeated fighters for nomenclature happiness hide under the word "repression".
PS
I do not hope that you both will forget the word 'repressions' and a whole series of events that had no impact on the course of the country and start to get to the bottom of what was going on in the 30s - zombified by a few words, you say them and seemingly reasonable people start talking nonsense.
I write for others who are sane and thinking.
How is it... you know how - With a kind word... and a gun.
article 58? don't make me laugh.