1200 subscribers!!! - page 124

 
Andrey F. Zelinsky:

By no means -- I don't want anything at all -- I'm just making my points, which if someone doesn't like them or finds them absurd -- they can ignore them altogether.

"Wanting" and "suggesting" -- there is a difference in those terms.

It's not responsibility -- it's irresponsibility as a way of making money. And there are several examples of this kind of earning -- Gonchar's signal, this signal -- they are all signals for a single influx of subscribers -- and there is no purpose in these signals to "live" for months.

Enter "at all" with a stop loss equal to a stop out of 60 points - such strategies "live" only by accident. Parsing and analyzing such signals is nothing more than a study of "systematic survivor error".

And to tell you how the provider does it -- that you can live with such risks for years and earn hundreds of percent a year, as long as you follow his unique "money management system" -- is to look "comical" at every legitimate stop-out, which, of course, was caused by a suddenly changing market.

  • Entering the industry "forex/buratino and the field of miracles" begins with the obligatory signing of the "risk of loss clause own funds"which states that 80% of the retail traders lose their funds. And the size your own funds(!!!) The amount that you can afford to lose. There is no talk about what a retail trader can earn, his earnings are a "survivor's mistake.
  • The more negligible a strategy is in its effect on the market, the longer it lives. You limit all miracle grads to 10 lots, and you immediately see the real picture, porno hamster would live "forever" (half a year for this strategy is an eternity) if the total lot in the market for all subscribers of 4mln$ would be about 10 lots on one pair. And if you successfully HYIP, you immediately reduce the lot volume, instead of increasing the trading lot volume in % of deposit as it is done in all EAs. Increase the lot = change the strategy to fit the increased lot.
  • Once you've entered the industry"forex/buratino and field of miracles". And sign the risk paper - everything the signal provider writes makes no legal / common sense.
  • Of course it would be nice if the platform allowed to cut out blatant cheats and draws. And looking at some of the signals, one gets suspicious that there is a defect (or flaw / loophole) in the way the % is calculated.
 
Vladimir Baskakov:
I'll keep watching, I just wonder what the next genius idea will be.

Now she will press marketing, like I tweaked the algorithm, the golden Eldorado begins).

 
Unicornis:

  • Entering the industry "forex/buratino and field of miracles" begins with a mandatory signed "risk of loss" clause our own funds"which states that 80% of retail traders lose their funds. And the size your own (!!!) funds The amount that you can afford to lose. There is no talk about what a retail trader can earn, his earnings are a "survivor's mistake.
  • The more negligible a strategy is in its effect on the market, the longer it lives. You limit all miracle grads to 10 lots, and you immediately see the real picture, porno hamster would live "forever" (half a year for this strategy is an eternity) if the total lot in the market for all subscribers would be about 10 lots on one pair. And if you successfully HYIP, you immediately reduce the lot volume, instead of increasing the trading lot volume in % of deposit as it is done in all EAs. Increase the lot = change the strategy to fit the increased lot.
  • Once you've entered the industry"forex/buratino and field of miracles". And sign the risk paper - everything the signal provider writes makes no legal / common sense.
  • Of course it would be nice if the platform allowed to cut out blatant cheats and draws. And looking at some of the signals, one gets the suspicion that there is a defect(or flaw/loophole) in the way the % is calculated.

What does she have to do with big lots? She's already closed long positions, but the ratio of longs is 63k, vs. 8.5 shorts. There's plenty for market makers to take out without her, as long as there's no squeeze, that's how the euro will go down

 
Evgeniy Grebenuik:

Now she's going to push marketing, like I tweaked the algorithm, the golden Eldorado begins)

Makes sense to divide by 8 now.
 
Evgeniy Grebenuik:

Now she's going to push marketing, like I tweaked the algorithm, the golden Eldorado begins)

I don't understand why they bother. They have a huge HYIP, some subscribers lost an amount that they can bear to lose and the logic of "condescending" is that if it lasted six months, now it has accounted for mistakes and next it will be the very, as you say, Eldorado.

Where has Gonchar gone anyway, he could have continued working according to the mechanics' scheme. He is in the book of records with his three-thousandth subscription.

 
Vladimir Baskakov:
It makes sense to divide by 8 now

ahah)

 
Andrey F. Zelinsky:

If I remember correctly, Market was announced in 2012.

In 7 years -- he has released a dozen of his most popular products, so to speak -- he regularly demonstrates in his signals how his advisors "live" -- in 7 years of very active trading and trading experience -- not one of his products, not one of his product customers -- has shown that his products are capable of profitable trading.

So you don't have to ask him "what to do" -- he doesn't and never has the answer.

His products are a quest.

+++
 
Andrey F. Zelinsky:

By no means -- I don't want anything at all -- I'm just making my points, which if someone doesn't like them or finds them absurd -- they can ignore them altogether.

"Wanting" and "suggesting" -- there is a difference in those terms.

It's not responsibility -- it's irresponsibility as a way of making money. And there are several examples of this kind of earning -- Gonchar's signal, this signal -- these are all signals for a single influx of subscribers -- and there is no purpose to "live" in these signals for months.

Enter "at all" with a stop loss equal to a stop out of 60 points - such strategies "live" only by accident. Parsing and analyzing such signals is nothing more than a study of "systematic survivor error".

And to tell them how the provider does it -- that one can live with such risks for years and earn hundreds of percent a year, as long as one follows his unique "money management system" -- is to look "comical" at every legitimate stop-out, which of course was caused by a suddenly changing market.

Reminds me of

That morning we had a lot of trouble with the steam barges. It was just before the Hanley Races, and there were plenty of barges coming down the river, some alone, others with covered boats in tow. I hate steam barges; I think anybody who has ever paddled one hates them. Every time I see a steam barge I feel like luring it into a deserted place and there, in peace and solitude, to strangle it.
There is something impertinent and self-confident in a steam barge which awakens my worst instincts and makes me long for the good old days, when I could express my opinion about it in the language of an axe and a bow and arrow. The very sight of a man standing aft with his hands in his pockets while smoking a cigar is enough in itself to warrant a breach of the peace, and a blowing of the whistle to get you out of the way would get you a fair conviction for 'lawful killing of man' on any shoreline jury, I'm sure.
And they did have to whistle to get us out of the way. Without wishing to sound like a braggart, I can honestly say that our little boat has caused more trouble, trouble and delays to oncoming barges this week than all the other vessels on the river combined.
"The barge is coming!" - one of us shouts, seeing an enemy in the distance, and in an instant everything is ready to meet. I get behind the wheel and Harris and George sit down beside me, also with their backs to the barque, and the boat slowly floats out into the middle of the river.
The barge, whistling, looms, and we swim on. At about a hundred yards it starts whistling like mad and all the passengers are over the side shouting at us but we can't hear them. Harris tells us some incident that happened to his mother and George and I eagerly catch every word he says. Then the barge emits one last shriek that almost makes the boiler burst, backs up and countersail, makes a full turn and runs aground. Everyone on board runs to the bow, the public on shore shouts something to us, other boats stop and get involved, so that the whole river is in a frenzy for miles in either direction. Here Harris interrupts at the most interesting point in his story, looks up with meek amazement and says to George:
- Look, George, I think there's a steam barge.
And George replies:
- Yeah, you know, it's like I hear something too.
After that we get worried and nervous and don't know how to get the boat out of the way. The people on the longboat crowd aboard and teach us:
- "Row right, you idiot! Left back! No, no, not you, the other one... Leave the rudder alone, damn it! Now, with both of them at once! Not like that! Oh, you...
Then they launch the boat and come to our rescue. After fifteen minutes of effort, we are cleared out of the way and the longboat is allowed to continue. We thank them and ask to be towed. But they don't agree.
We've found another way to annoy the aristocratic steam barges: we pretend to think they're a floating restaurant and ask whether they're from Messrs Cubit or the Bermondsey Good Knights and ask to borrow a pot.


 
Rashid Umarov:

Reminds me of

I'm sure the subscribers of that signal have been blowing the service desk's mind for a month now.
 
Rashid Umarov:

Reminds me of

"Memories, whether joyful or bitter, are always painful; at least that's how it is with me; but the torment is also sweet. And when the heart becomes heavy, painful, lingering, sad, then memories refresh and revive it, as drops of dew on a damp evening, after a hot day, refresh and revive a poor, stunted flower, burnt by the heat of the day." [F.M.Dostoevsky "Poor People"]

p.s. from zugzwang retreated to the river bank -- "better to read than to write" [Rosh]

Reason: