How to Spot Fake “AI” EAs on MQL5: 9 Red Flags Before You Buy (Save Your Money)
The “AI EA” wave has turned MQL5 into a minefield.
You’ll see:
-
insane equity curves
-
luxury screenshots
-
promises of “no drawdown”
-
“AI-powered” labels on basic indicators
-
strategies that look perfect… until they explode
If you’ve ever bought an EA that worked for a week and then died, this post is for you.
Here are 9 red flags that help you filter out garbage and focus on robust, realistic systems.
Key Takeaways (Read This First)
-
“AI” marketing is cheap—robust trading is not.
-
Most blown accounts come from martingale/grid/overfit systems.
-
A clean EA is usually simpler, not more complicated.
-
Broker execution matters: bad spreads/slippage can make any EA look worse.
-
Build a small portfolio you can validate and scale (Axi Select > challenge addiction).
Red Flag #1: Martingale / Grid Hidden Behind Fancy Words
If you see:
-
“recovery mode”
-
“smart averaging”
-
“AI position rescue”
-
“dynamic lots”
…be careful.
Many of these are just martingale/grid with new labels.
The problem:
They can look amazing until the one trend day wipes months of gains.
Red Flag #2: “No Drawdown” or “Always Wins”
Trading has drawdowns.
Any EA claiming:
-
“never loses”
-
“no drawdown”
-
“always profitable”
…is marketing, not reality.
Robust systems survive drawdowns. They don’t pretend they don’t exist.
Red Flag #3: Backtest Looks Too Smooth (Curve-Fitting)
A backtest with a perfect slope and tiny drawdowns can be a warning sign.
Why?
Because real markets are messy:
-
spread changes
-
volatility shifts
-
regime changes
Overfit systems collapse the moment conditions change.
Red Flag #4: Tiny Trade Count (No Statistical Meaning)
If the strategy has:
-
very few trades
-
short testing period
-
cherry-picked date range
…it can’t prove anything.
A strategy can “look great” on 30 trades.
That doesn’t mean it survives real life.
Red Flag #5: Strategy Depends on “Perfect Execution”
Some EAs only work if:
-
spreads stay tiny 24/5
-
slippage is basically zero
-
you get ideal fills every time
In live trading, that rarely happens.
This is why broker choice matters for EA execution:
IC Trading (raw spreads / low trading cost):
https://bit.ly/3KvI9RO
Pepperstone (broad EA compatibility):
https://bit.ly/4ophy72
A good broker won’t fix a bad EA, but a bad broker can ruin a good one.
Red Flag #6: 500 Inputs (The “Blame the User” Trap)
When an EA has endless settings, the seller can always say:
“You configured it wrong.”
A robust EA should be:
-
simple to run
-
stable
-
not a puzzle
-
not dependent on endless optimization
In real trading, simplicity is a feature.
Red Flag #7: No Clear Logic or Explanation
If the strategy description is:
-
vague
-
full of hype
-
no real explanation
-
no realistic expectations
…run.
You don’t need the full secret sauce, but you need clarity:
-
trend? breakout? mean reversion?
-
what markets?
-
what timeframe?
-
how it behaves in volatility?
Red Flag #8: “AI” With No Evidence of Process
“AI” is often slapped onto:
-
RSI filters
-
moving averages
-
basic pattern rules
Real AI process would usually show:
-
data-driven research
-
validation workflow
-
robustness testing
-
clear operating assumptions
If it’s just a label, it’s marketing.
Red Flag #9: No Real-World Validation (Only Screenshots)
Screenshots are easy.
Real validation means:
-
stable forward testing
-
consistent execution
-
realistic drawdowns
-
a process that survives time
The best approach is always:
Backtest sanity → forward test → small live → scale.
If you skip forward testing, you’re buying a lottery ticket.
What “Real Robustness” Looks Like (Simple and Repeatable)
A robust EA is usually:
-
built for stability
-
easy to run
-
not dependent on 200 parameters
-
tested in a realistic way
-
designed to survive different regimes
That’s why I prefer systems that are:
-
stable
-
simple
-
portfolio-friendly
Because scaling requires repeatability.
A Simple, Clean EA Foundation (MT4/MT5)
Instead of chasing hype, build a small portfolio you can validate.
Two engines, two behaviors:
JPY Trend EA ProTrading (74 USD)
MT5: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157484
MT4: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157485
Gold Trend Breakout EA ProTrading (74 USD)
MT5: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157465
MT4: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157466
Why this approach beats random “AI robots”:
-
clear strategy behavior
-
simple to operate
-
easier to validate
-
portfolio structure from day one
Scaling Capital: Don’t Scale Hype — Scale Process (Axi Select)
Most traders scale the wrong thing:
they scale excitement.
The smart move is to scale:
-
stable execution
-
validated systems
-
controlled risk
If you’re serious about scaling, compare Axi Select:
https://bit.ly/48TlcAc
This is what most prop-firm-obsessed traders miss:
capital scaling only works when the foundation is stable.
FAQ (SEO Boost)
Are “AI EAs” on MQL5 real?
Some may be, but most “AI” labels are marketing. The key is to evaluate robustness, validation process, and risk behavior.
What is the biggest red flag when buying an EA?
Hidden martingale/grid logic and curve-fitted backtests are the most common account killers.
Why do some EAs look amazing in backtests but fail live?
Because of over-optimization, unrealistic assumptions, and execution factors like spreads/slippage.
Does broker choice matter when buying an EA?
Yes. Bad execution can ruin expectancy. Especially for Gold and breakout systems.
What’s a smarter scaling path than prop firm challenge loops?
Compare Axi Select if you want scaling aligned better with systematic trading:
https://bit.ly/48TlcAc
Quick Links
Axi Select:
https://bit.ly/48TlcAc
IC Trading:
https://bit.ly/3KvI9RO
Pepperstone:
https://bit.ly/4ophy72
JPY Trend EA ProTrading
MT5: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157484
MT4: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157485
Gold Trend Breakout EA ProTrading
MT5: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157465
MT4: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/157466
