AI DeepLayer Dynamics MT5

I purchased "AI DeepLayer Dynamics MT5" in end-July. I tested it on a Demo Account for five weeks. And for eight weeks till today I had used it on Real Account. That is, I have a good base of 5+8=13 weeks, not just 2-3 days. I only used “Strategy 4” (I don’t think strategies 1-3 have proven to be good, or that they work at all). For the above-mentioned period of eight weeks on a real account, if I divide the profit received by the days during which the bot worked, then this makes an average of 2.6% per day. Despite that I was aware of the other reviews, I continued to use the EA till today - 17th of October, when all profit gained from past eight weeks gone away with just two trades. As is known, the current version of "Strategy 4" has no Stop loss. What does it mean? Well, try driving a car without functioning brakes... Yes, you could drive, untill crush... I will not use that EA on Real Account by any means, unless in the future there will be some significant (for its work) update. Pay really attention to all reviews, comments and think.

Scam

Im updating my review , the person above me wrote how much profit he got from strategy 4 , but the funny realty is that the author burned 2 different accounts on strategy 4 that's why he deleted them form the live signal they both got 100%dd and the accounts got to 0 dont trust this seller non of his ea makes money on the long run , very small profits but when the sl hits it will burn u hard.

Dont fall to this trap it costed me a lot of money while he promising that the "next update" will run smoothly

You can also look on his Strategy 1 (ICMarkets) – View Signal , he stopped it running for u to think how good the profit chart looks , but for to this day it didnt take any tade for 17 days (while the ea got for another sl this period), he afraid to let it run thats why he stopped it from running he knows that in the long run it will blow ur account. You can c that the author doesn't believe in his ea's that why he is trading 100$ accounts

I’ve been working with NeuroDynamics EA for quite some time now, and I feel it’s only fair to share a proper perspective here, especially after seeing some of the negative remarks. To be completely honest, I don’t really understand where the frustration comes from, because my own experience has been very different. First of all, the author is one of the most dedicated and detail-oriented developers I’ve come across on MQL5. He doesn’t just release an EA and forget about it — he constantly follows up, answers questions, provides updates, and even brings out entirely new modules and strategies to keep the system evolving. You can clearly see that he puts a lot of effort and thought into making the product better with every version. As for performance, trading is never going to be a straight line up — anyone who has spent real time in the markets knows this. There will be good days and challenging days, that’s just the nature of trading. But what matters is that NeuroDynamics has a solid, intelligent logic behind it. It filters conditions, it adapts, and it manages trades in a way that feels robust. It’s not some cheap martingale or grid trick trying to impress you in backtests — it’s a system with real structure. I’ve also noticed that some people expect miracles right after installation. But in reality, running an EA properly requires patience, the right broker conditions, and realistic expectations. On my side, when set up correctly, NeuroDynamics has delivered consistency, and it continues to do so. Another point worth mentioning is the author’s transparency. He never hides from questions, and if there’s something to improve, he takes it seriously. That’s rare. Many developers disappear once they make sales, but here we actually have someone who is invested in building long-term value and helping traders succeed. To sum up: NeuroDynamics is not just “another EA.” It’s a sophisticated tool backed by a developer who truly cares about his work and about the people using it. I believe that’s why there are many satisfied users who don’t always leave reviews — because they are quietly running it and happy with the results. Personally, I think it’s worth standing up and saying that this is one of the most professional products I’ve seen in the market, and it deserves recognition for what it is.

After a series of wins, around 18%, I am currently down 50%. Maximum loss rule is set to 10%, but it is obviously not working. Stay away from this EA unless you have too much money!

performance is not as expected like backtest. waste of money . please dont buy. its like scam

Huge SL compared to TP. One big SL kill all TP and kill your equity too. This is a mistake all scalping bots have. I hope you can truly fix this to protect investor's accounts

L'utilisateur n'a laissé aucun commentaire sur la note

The live signals are good, and the EA demonstrates a solid risk-to-reward ratio that supports long-term viability. Unlike many so-called “AI” EAs, this one is genuinely diversified, running across nine pairs so that a single loss does not jeopardize the account. In the all-pairs back-test, both long and short positions were opened simultaneously across different pairs, which helped to limit drawdown.

Another compelling feature is that the EA applies a distinct strategy to each pair, allowing drawdowns on some pairs to be offset by profits on others. This diversification reduces risk and increases the likelihood of consistent profitability. I also observed that the EA will sometimes close all open positions once the combined net profit is positive, even if some trades are in loss. This technique locks in gains while avoiding deeper drawdowns. Since the EA already shows a high probability of closing trades in profit, this method further amplifies its performance. Even when trades occasionally move against it, the overall accuracy rate remains very high, with the sum of decisions compounding into stronger long-term results.

The fourth all-pairs recovery strategy does incorporate martingale, but the EA uses protective techniques to manage exposure and close all positions in a way that functions similarly to a group stop-loss. I plan to update my review with a more detailed analysis of how this mechanism works at a later date.

Most EAs of this type fail due to poor position management, lack of diversification, or weak risk-to-reward ratios. This one stands out because of its predictive ability. The same algorithms that identifies entries is also applied to managing and exiting trades, so its predictive qualities extend across the entire trading process.

I purchased an AI EA about a year ago that initially performed poorly on XAUUSD due to increased volatility and the poor adaptability of the money management method. However, the losses were eventually recovered, and the back-test results from a few months ago through to the present matched closely with the back-test history prior and soon after its release. Based on this and other factors, my view is that these AI EAs are not over-optimized. Instead, the back-test charts should be interpreted as representing the statistical probability of a position winning rather than as exact forecasts.

I am holding off on a five-star rating until the developer implements the additional features outlined in the roadmap, but the EA already shows impressive potential.

This is the first EA that I have purchased that uses AI technology (if this is the correct terminology) as have also stuck with the more tradional EAs. Been running on demo for 1 month and very impressed. You simply have to select which one of the 4 strategies to use and set your risk preference and then just let the EA do its thing. I have bombarded Peter (the developer) with lots of questions and you promptly receive very in-depth replies. You can tell that Peter is highly knowledgeable and technical person which is very reassuring. I now feel very comfortable in going live which i will be doing for start of next week.

I didn’t even touch the settings — it adapts on its own, filters pairs intelligently, and executes based on real conditions. It honestly feels like having a private quant trader working for you 24/7

I'm looking forward to it. I'll post my results in the comments or review.

2025/09/02

XAGUSD reached full SL in September, following July.

I'll remove the XAG and run it and see what happens.

I know it’s still early to say, but I would like to share my feedback from the first four days of trading: This is an excellent product — the entries are accurate and profitable. The operations vary slightly from broker to broker (I trade on four different ones); sometimes the entry and exit prices differ (nothing out of the ordinary), and in some cases, trades are opened on different assets depending on the broker. I have disabled trading on USD/JPY because I got stuck in some trades on that pair and had to close them manually. That said, overall, it’s an excellent product. Congratulations to the team!

@Edit 10.07.2025

Peter's Automated Strategies (EAs) performed excellently at the beginning. However, over time, I noticed that the profits were not compensating for the losses. As a result, my $5,000 account was wiped out, and two other larger accounts incurred losses that I will have to recover gradually, manually.

Peter himself is very attentive and helpful, but at this moment, I have decided to stop using the EAs until new updates (if they are released) restore confidence and prove to be profitable in the long run.

At this point, I believe that both I and other users are disappointed with the results. I will await further clarification from him and hope that the issue will be resolved. From this moment on, I will only recommend the EAs again if the problems are properly addressed and their effectiveness is restored.

@Edit1

After one month of use, I’m pleasantly surprised. All the strategies perform well. I did get stuck in a EUR/USD position using the EUR strategy due to recent events, but nothing out of the ordinary. I recommend combining different strategies to make the most of them. I’ve started using it on a personal account with a larger capital and will provide an update soon.

@Edit 2

September Update (covering last month):

Strategy 1 ended at break-even, while Strategy 4 got stuck in open trades. Regarding these issues, the developer (Peter) mentioned that he has already fixed them; however, I am currently running new tests on larger accounts. The XAU and EUR strategies are performing very well.

I removed the AUD/USD pair since this is not the first time I have taken losses on it, and I also removed USD/JPY as it once again got stuck in positions. The new USDSGD pair is being monitored; however, I have already verified that the spread is too high due to it being an exotic currency, which makes it unprofitable as the spread cost outweighs the potential returns.

Overall, I continue to recommend both the EA and Peter for the excellent support provided.