The future of the Forex industry - page 130
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I admit that a cultured, self-respecting person would not respond in such tones. Well, a scoop from overseas is fine. Gee-gee. How are the parts sales going?)) From the manufacturer's factory))))
Again this envious hygienic loser is projecting episodes of his life onto me 😯😑 unlearned some...
I admit that a cultured, self-respecting person would not respond in such tones. Well, a scoop from overseas is fine. Gee-gee. How are the parts sales going?)) From the manufacturer's factory))))
Realize that if you with higher education have been hired as a caretaker (as you said yourself earlier), you have only yourself to blame - and not the Driller 😂
If you develop the theme of uneven wealth distribution, theoretically there should be a point above which the probability of your wealth increasing is greater than 50% and vice versa.
My guess is somewhere between $100 and $500 k, has anyone done any digging in this direction?
As a society develops, inequalities tend to increase, in primitive and tribal societies inequalities are minimal, hunter-gatherers of all sorts...
The transition to a producing economy, inequalities in resources and production techniques cause and exacerbate inequalities...
An extreme form of inequality with slavery, classes...
However, industrial production mitigates inequalities and makes the distribution of goods more comfortable, as does the distribution of power (a shift from monarchy to democracy)
Nowadays, inequality is largely a function of a person's abilities (and the starting environment of course).
According to Emile Durkheim, the reason for inequality is the need to reward the best. In all societies some professions are considered more important than others. In primitive societies the most respected were warriors and healers. In Puritan communities the most important profession is that of a priest. In modern societies it is the profession of banker and entrepreneur, engineer and doctor. That person who performs the main function in society has the maximum amount of prestige and material benefits. The second cause of inequality is the different level of talent in people, and the most skillful ones should be rewarded for their merits, they should perform the most important functions. At all times, the most important functions have been those of a priest, a manager and a technician.
In fact, this nervous character Ulad is useful here for several reasons:
You can learn the truth from the anti-examples and the very fact that life's fouls exist is very important to understand how things are, so Ulad is useful after all...
It all started when Vlad self-identified with a low skilled cleaning lady and started to resent - thus showing his real life status😀 after which he started painful resentments with a Dreamer attack - which is typical for losers who look for external causes of their failures - in psychology it is called Transference...
In reality, Pareto's law requires the existence of a large number of such characters and it is not surprising that they appear here confirming the uneven distribution of reality in complex systems.
It is generally accepted that the average disposable income of the richest 10% of the population is 10 times that of the poorest 10%, but the same can probably be said about the distribution of ability and cultural capital, not just financial capital.
The strongest evidence of deep and hopeless degradation is the gopnik hygiene as the universal answer, the reptilian instincts are evident in this, as the ration/intelligence of such characters is powerless, it's obvious. 😃
Nervous can only be to injustice. Yeah it's not even nerves, it's a reaction to injustice.
I don't envy people to anyone, only nature to whom it has given great opportunities to see and know the future.
On the level ofculturalpoverty YOU can certainly keep quiet.) You don't have it. But you just don't notice it.
About income later))))))))
If you develop the theme of uneven wealth distribution, theoretically there should be a point above which the probability of your wealth increasing is greater than 50% and vice versa.
My guess is somewhere between $100 and $500 k, has anyone dug in that direction?
I think it depends on how successful the entrepreneur's strategy is, because the upsurge can be multiple if you find a successful theme.
I can only be nervous about injustice. It's not even nerves, it's a reaction to injustice.
I don't envy anyone else, only nature who has been given great opportunities to see and know the future.
On the level ofculturalpoverty YOU can certainly keep quiet.) You don't have it. But you just don't notice it.
About the income then))))))))
Of course... 😁😂🤣 everyone can see you tearing up in anger and throwing yourself at Drimmer and hype like a gopnik...
Just today Drimmer came into the thread and you came running in here as well....
And now you're trying hard to pretend you're not a tearjerker and it's especially funny 😆
It was the same last time, remember...
About income later))))))))
In your next life 🤣😃😄
If you develop the theme of uneven wealth distribution, theoretically there should be a point above which the probability of your wealth increasing is greater than 50% and vice versa.
My guess is somewhere between $100 and $500 k, has anyone done any digging in this direction?
Surely there are plenty of scientific articles on this subject using game theory.