The future of the Forex industry - page 136

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:

Life in general changes, especially in innovation) But after the advent of law, it does not essentially change. From hunters to farmers tribes, cities, states, at this stage societies changed, but the law appeared and, laws are in general the same motivated. Preservation of power, and for preservation of just and morally justified postulates. Nothing has changed)

Sure as hell has changed!

Now would not know the difference between Roman law and leno-feudal and early capitalist law...

And the nature of power changes too, one thing is an absolute monarchy, another thing is with parliament.

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:


International contracts are more of a problem, but getting to know the signatories of these contracts in bed is a reality))) The IMF director was caught naked trying to make love to a hotelier.) Everyone's human and nothing human is alien to them.)

Well there are always isolated episodes, but you won't say that for example Monica determined the affairs and strategy of the Anglo-Saxons in the relevant period, will you? 😀

Or the IMF, a lot of people like to scream that it's a terrible robbery and all that... So the IMF agents went and personally whipped all the signatories or what? 🤣

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:


Yes, and in the factory, gaining experience, afterwards, or by combining, or within the factory, you can achieve something. And this is the more numerous option, genius ideas that are sold out are usually in temporary demand, and they are few and short-lived. The element of chance is great.

It happens of course, but as we know a large part of those who are in the factory, just sit there until retirement and nothing.

Selling business ideas is a real market, just not formalized, a kind of private OTC.

Come to conferences where the Dreamer speaks and you will get ideas shoved in all pockets 😀😁🤣

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:

Glam is a business of entertainment. And it's serious business when all is well. Now the glamour business has faded))) Generally intelligible speech, wording, the right goals voiced at the right time! always enthused, called and enticed to do things, not just production)))). But that's just the right pontsy not everyone is given).

Well in general it is of course secondary, but in a stable economy it can be very, very weighty sales...

 
transcendreamer:

I would say that risk ratings played a key role there.

I don't think Schumpeter had anything to do with it at all.


Animal Farm seems to be only a comedy.
In general no one has probably disparaged communism/USSR as much as Orwell did. 😀

There's a brilliant adaptation of 1984 with the same title.

According to Joseph, the transfer of funds into a risky uncontrolled and unentrepreneurial earning zone led to the crisis.

Animal Farm is strong stuff. The development of society and its crisis due to sloppy law is well described.

Virgin Branson certainly tried hard making the film. But they didn't make A Dog's Heart. It's a bit heavy. Although in the text.

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:


If the person/specialist is happy with everything, there is no problem...

I mean, he may not realise he's sitting there for nothing...


What's in the picture? How does it prove the importance of the middle stratum for self-determination or self-organization? The cities of the middle stratum could be said to be Great Novgorod and Carthage in their time. There, by the way, there was the least inequality towards neighbours....

Sociologists have noticed a shift in emphasis and bimodality, on the one hand in the shape of the curve it looks like a slightly flatter distribution more flatter, and on the other .... it could be the division of society into two classes, and oddly enough this is the scenario I periodically dream about, hardcore cyber feudal capitalism almost, corporate power, maybe what is happening in Silicon Valley is the beginning of such a process...

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:


Yes, a person's psychosomatics hasn't changed much, so the motivations are the same) It's been like that for ten thousand years or more).

There's a big difference between living under the Pharaohs and now...

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:


This is your private unconvincing opinion) His definitions of innovation and the separation of capitalist and entrepreneur are still relevant today. And yes, entrepreneurs are the elite of business and society, because they develop it (society). And elitist democracy is an unfortunate term from his reasoning, which, by the way, he did not substantiate. They are written, that perhaps this is one of the best ways of development of the society. He was mistaken with you at this point, as he put economics before the law.

Did you miss the posts about the venerable Schumpeter shitting his pants in a ministerial job and then in a bank?

And no one is arguing about the separation of investor and start-up...

Even for Schumpeter, elitist democracy had the sense of an intellectual elite above all, to which he obviously counted himself.

Especially since with his socialist ambitions at the end of his career, this was the only kind of elitism he had left...

The elite will have some kind of elite in any case, including in a democracy of course, simply by the fact that they are more weighty people than others.

The economy is above the right in the existential sense.

So you can order everybody to be fed, but if there is no production, what's the use?

Poor Khorosh kept complaining about the low wages...

Does anyone feel sorry for him to get a raise? - Yes, but where can they get the extra product for that money? - One has to create it first...

Ulad is the worst because he cannot even work in a factory, he can only be a cleaner, so he resented it all the way.

The economy exists before the law and even without the law - that should be obvious.

You can't even try to drag Graeber with the debt - it's a bottom.

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:

Too great an element of chance to be in a weak group) Times are unique, of course, but I wish the change would come to an end sooner)))) And the expression - are you so?, stable with no change, is perceived as a successful average life, like stability is valued today) Not a good trend)

If you find yourself in a weak group - mimic a strong one and join another group...

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:

According to Josef, the transfer of funds to a risky uncontrolled and unentrepreneurial earning zone led to the crisis.

The barnyard is a strong thing. The development of society and its crisis due to sloppy law is well described.

Virgin Branson certainly tried hard making the film. But they didn't make A Dog's Heart. It's a bit heavy. Although in the text.

If everybody leaves the factories and starts trading, it'll be a disaster, but then everything will go back to normal when they realize what's fading.

The peculiarity is that people do it all the time, but not necessarily in synchronous waves.

Therefore, such overflows can be imperceptible.

Which allows vampires to continue their evil deeds 😀

Nowadays even telegram channels are making money on this flow by selling trivial signals signals on a growing market...