GRAAL - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I assure you, the price will sooner or later go hard somewhere simply unknown...
I'm sure he'll be back someday...
I wish I could live in this season
I and you will never have to.
If the price goes up by n (enter parameter settings), then buy, and if down - sell with stop loss at n but without take profit. Then if the price goes up by n pips from the price of last open order, then same thing happens again downwards. Make PLEASE THIS GRALITY!!!!! there are always trends, price will go up or down strongly anyway . PLEASE DO IT, IT'S VERY SIMPLE, EASY !
In trend markets, if price has moved sharply from one side of the corridor/channel/chain to the other, then it has changed trend and should look along it.
The old known method - if the H1 candlestick is more than N points, then we open by it.
It is for trend markets. It worked for currencies some time ago, but it's in the past.
I only have to envy your speed of information processing.
the man spent 93 pages explaining the simplest thing, but it took me a while to understand it too, around the 25th I stopped reading
forex is a dogmatic model that for years that prevents the sometimes brightest thoughts of others from entering the brain
the man is asking how to make a 50/50 probability into at least a 70/30 one.
my answer to this is this:
at least he is right about 50/50, apparently a high probability is also about 70/30, but not 100%.
a simple example - pullbacks and bounces
He does not take into account that not every trend reverses after exactly 100 points, here the unknown - after how many points?
Thus, 70/30 should be multiplied by almost zero.
The conclusion is that the flat and the trend are not combined.
Most probably, his system was flat // just look at the chart of those years.
In fact, it turns out the opposite: 30/70 and that is enough for unquestionable success, ATS says. or about that value:
You, anyway, are persecuting your opinion, and the opinion of the majority of gore-traders about opposing traders. I=have tried to convince everyone of the opposite according to the MT4-opponent scheme, i.e., the imaginary puppet and you. are on different sides of the barricade, unless both sides unite, because, in fact, there is no opponent in the market. It seems to everyone that they are conditionally divided on the sides of a non-existent barricade, even if it is a conditional opponent. Now, are you convinced that you are at war with yourself?
everything is in balance and you are convinced of that.
With more than one currency pair it is visible to the naked eye.
the resulting profit is spread to other pairs
the balance remains!
he is in fact the main enemy!
the trader may reverse the profit and the loss trades, as long time ago wrote about probability (see link above), nothing will happen, at least on a real account
however the mathematics is of help
she is inexorably dragging equity up and only upeverything is in balance and you have made sure of it.
with more than one currency pair it is visible to the naked eye
the resulting profit is spread over other pairs
the balance remains!
he is in fact the main enemy
the trader may reverse the profit and the loss trades, as long time ago wrote about probability (see link above), nothing will happen, at least on a real account
however the mathematics is helpful.
she is inexorably dragging equity up and only upForget about probability, everything is ruled by a pattern and it is not for nothing Marx said: "Chance is a manifestation of necessity!" Stomp out all information about probability and its patrons, as well as, the teachings of it.
Forget probability - regularity rules everything and it was not for nothing that Marx uttered: "Randomness is a manifestation of necessity!" Screw all information about probability and its patrons and doctrines.
Well, of course.
mathematics probably rules, or else how? //the queen
;)
Well, of course.
maths probably rules, otherwise how else?
;)
There is an opinion that the human brain is controlled from outside, not completely, but to a large extent.