GRAAL - page 5

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Vitaly, there's no point in taking what's in the box somewhere

I mean, if the buying equals the selling, then what is there to take out?

there is a delta in the minilot, then you can take it out

for example we took out the sales on the eve

so it goes up

If we do not know what's inside it, the most important thing is a positive result. If there is no slippage, no problem, and they may stand on their heads, we are not interested.

 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

It doesn't matter what's inside, it's the positive outcome that counts. The price of the bid/ask is fixed and normalised to the digits to the signal by a constant.

Bid/ask price is fixed and normalized by digits to the signal constant

all slippages are removed from the order, execution is performed at fixed prices

the signal is executed at the fixed Bid/Ask.

if there is a requote, it means someone is trying to overbid the price

until everything is accurate, no trade order will be executed

you can also fix the spread.

if spread is bigger, there is no order

that is all

upd

the timer is pushing the ontick

 

Such systems are only made semi-automatic, usually from strong levels. On a full automatic system, success will be variable.

About three years ago we have been testingthe "grail" by Garmalga: there were about a dozen variants of pyramiding, grids, overlapping of orders. On the demo, a three-day trend increased the deposit a hundred times, you just need time to fill the demo bags)

 
buy at the bottom and sell at the top
 
apr73:

Such a system was shown here on the forum a long time ago .

I'd like to see it.

in the 4pc?

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

I'd like to see

in a 4-pack?

Isn't your grail enough, or did you break down?))

 
khorosh:

Not enough of your own grail, or have you broken down?)))

no, it's alive

it's interesting - how it was made, what the man came up with, where he is now

 
Who could program it?
 
apr73:

https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/124729

the man is asking how to make a 50/50 probability into at least 70/30.

My answer to this is the following:

at least he is right about 50/50, apparently high probability is 70/30, but not 100%.

a simple example - pullbacks and bounces

He does not take into account that not every trend reverses after exactly 100 points, here the unknown - after how many points?

Thus, 70/30 should be multiplied by almost zero.

The conclusion is that the flat and the trend are not combined.

it's more likely that his system was flat // just look at the chart of those years.

 

In financial markets there is a lognormal distribution, i.e. price changes over time are large.

price = last order open price
if price = last order open price + N (pips) > open buy ( SL= N)
if price = last order open price - N (pips) > open sell( SL= N)

I would have programmed it myself but i don't have the skills. can someone help me?

Reason: