Regularity or Randomness - page 46
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
To answer Law or Randomness, you must know what is Law and what is Randomness. What is a regularity is a manifestation of some connection of certain objects and phenomena, in essence it is an explicit or implicit functional dependence of a certain target function on certain arguments. Let us now recall what Randomness is. The strictest mathematical definition: a Random Value is a measurable FUNCTION defined on the space of elementary events relative to a sigma-algebra. So there is nothing Random in this world, only unknowable Regularity.
You can tell right away that the guy is NOT a boxing champion.
Regularities in the market are a dime a dozen. There is not always repeatability. But we are not "in the dark", we can defend ourselves with a stop.
It is the greedy who lose. I get greedy too, and then I laugh at myself. He was hoping))
The market does not recognize the hope of a reversal.
Regularities are a dime a dozen in the market. There is not always repeatability. But we are not in the habit of defending ourselves with a stop.
If you assume that there are no regularities in the market, there is no need to look for them. So much time is freed up.)
If you consider that there are no regularities in the market, you don't need to look for them. So much time is freed up.)
And play?
Like children in a sandbox.
It's a thrill.
What's the point of that phrase? I'm not sure what you mean.
If you consider that there are no regularities in the market, you don't need to look for them. So much time is freed up.)
Bull's-eye again. But for that you need to know the Third Prediction Method. 1. The method of extrapolation, transferring the past to the future. 2. The method of expert judgement, one says up, the other says down. 3. Behavioural modeling, oddly enough, also refers to forecasting methods.
The patterns in the markets persist. But their characteristics do not. That is, the dimensionality and lifespan of a pattern can vary considerably. Extrapolation is not exactly a reliable companion here. The shape looks yes, but the size is wrong, no not).
The patterns in the markets persist. But their characteristics do not. I.e. the dimensionality and lifespan of a pattern can vary considerably. Extrapolation is not exactly a reliable companion here. The shape looks yes, but the dimension is wrong, no it isn't).
found a couple of points about the regular or random behaviour of trading instruments. I found the first one today, I already posted the second one in stock trading, I found the third one a long time ago, but didn't post it.
1)GBPUSD. The pattern formed on the minute charts today is very similar to the pattern formed in 2008 on the daily charts. I marked a similar area with red lines and put arrows.
2) The charts of two currency pairs 2008 AUDUSD and EURJPY look identical on h4
3)The shares of the two companies nlmk and magn are very similar, almost identical despite different industries.
So the question goes on: is the market developing in accordance with the formula or by chance? I myself am leaning towards a formula-based development.
So the question goes on: does the market evolve according to a formula or by chance? I myself am inclined to develop according to the formula.
The formulae... I sometimes dream about it...