Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 570
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Actually, statistics is not only about SCEs and bollinger)
But in general the market is SB for you and for me. You do not know what is inside the market. you cannot analyse all bids and volumes in forex at once.
Yes, of course, the market itself is not the SB, but for me and all other players it is pure SB with elements of emissions.
The characteristic of the process depends on the observer, because the result depends on the actions of the observer, not on the market.
You have put the robot, you have opened a deposit, you have already filled it twice, the robot opens and closes trades, not the market, right?
So regarding only your actions, not market fluctuations - the market is SB.
So your task is to make sure that the market is not a SB in relation to your actions.
No, it hasn't been that way for me for a long time.
How?
Yeah... Tough...
It would be interesting to make a branch where only one entry condition is searched, but such that its quantitative value has a directly proportional dependence on trade security. That is, with increasing/decreasing values of the indicator,
theSL would be cut off less frequently .
It would be the real Holy Grail.
The likelihood of a day's worth of SL being cut down is about that:
depends on market activity and does NOT depend on your/my algorithm and the size of the stop
If you don't want to worry about stops, you probably shouldn't make them part of the TS.
but how?
the market is all about buying and selling
no one will trade, the price will be stalled
if they are mostly buying, the price is down and not even close to SB, but definitely down.Aren't you tired of your own bullshit about forex volumes yet?
The creators of this wonderful casino called forex, enough to create a model in which there will be different elements that will either drain the trend martingale(different variations of flat, clinging overturn orders), but not give much to earn trend anti-martin, or drain the flat martin(no return), but not give much to earn a flat anti-martin. These elements are spread chaotically, but so that, on average, not a single mm, over a long distance, did not earn. Systems with a constant lot pour in on spread, commissions, and the shoals of DTshek.
Any filtration reduces profitability and simply postpones the drain to a later date.
the market is all about buying and selling
no one will trade, the price will be stoked.
if mostly buys, the price is down and not even close to SB, but definitely down.Again this naked absurdity, when the price on purchases falls.
And the sun sets in the east and apples fall into the sky.
We're not talking about volumes at all.
rest
the probability of "cutting down the SL" during the day is about the same:
depends on market activity and does NOT depend on your/my algorithm and the size of the stop
To avoid worrying about stops, you probably shouldn't make them part of the TS.
Absolutely right.
Well, how can we place a stop to an order if we are trading a specific direction, i.e. buying or selling.
A stop is only in one case - a justified change of direction to enter the trade, or the start of a pullback/rebound, or an entry error.
Aren't you tired of your own bullshit about forex volumes yet?
The creators of this wonderful casino called forex, enough to create a model in which there will be different elements that will either drain the trend martingale(different variations of flat, clinging overturn orders), but not give much to earn trend anti-martin, or drain the flat martin(no return), but not give much to earn a flat anti-martin. These elements are spread chaotically, but so that, on average, not a single mm, over a long distance, did not earn. Systems with a constant lot pour in on spread, commissions, and the shoals of DTshek.
Any filtration reduces profitability and simply postpones the drain to a later date.
Max, there is one thing you don't understand.
Trending and counter-trending are two opposite trades, two opposite entries !!!
If the analysis is so weak that it cannot clearly determine where the price is going, then we have to either improve the analytical part of the trading system, or get out of the market.
Because only in this case the market becomes a casino, 50/50, or SB - all this, given the high risks in forex, will lead to failure.
Max, there's one thing you don't understand
Trending and counter-trending are two opposite trades, two opposite entries!!!
If the analysis is so weak that it cannot clearly determine where the price is going, then you must either refine the analytical part of the trading system, or get out of the market.
Because only in this case, the market becomes a casino, 50/50, or SB - all this, given the high risks in forex, will lead to a loss.
Renat, take off what you have. And forget about it.
They live off people like us.
Give them 4 quid for cigarettes. Keep the rest.
It'll be the best trade of your life. You'll make a million if you do.
I'm with you.