You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, I believe that Martin systems cannot be stable.
What is your criterion for determining stability?
What is your definition of stability?
Probably the number of deposits you lose :)
Probably the number of deposits I've lost :)
I would like to get an answer to this question from him. Suppose we have an EA with Martin, but with a loss limit of 25%. Suppose during a year the Expert Advisor makes losses only 75% three times but gains 200%, the total profit is 125%. Can this EA be considered stable? I think so. Does he admit that this kind of performance of an EA with a martin is possible?
khorosh - think about it - if your strategy (without adjustment) does not have a clear advantage in the +++ side of the long story all the results will be 50/50
Read the theory of matrix expectations .............
khorosh - think about it - if your strategy (without adjustment) does not have a clear advantage in the +++ side of the long story all the results will be 50/50
Read the theory of matrix expectations .............
Is it impossible with martin?
I would like an answer to this question. Suppose we have an EA with a Martin, but with a loss limit of 25%. Suppose during a year this EA closes losses 3 times with only 75% loss, but at the same time it gains 200%, the final profit is 125%. Can this EA be considered stable? I think so. Does he admit that this kind of performance of an EA with a martin is possible?
95% of profitable trades are just Martin with overbidding.
probably you're wrong - because what is martini - is the approximate scheme = 1-1-2-4(tp) - ie 1-1-2 will close with a loss and only 4 will bring a profit - ie if the average profitable 25-30% - then it may indicate a martini ...
And if the Pyramid goes in profit - the scheme - 1-1-2-4-8-TP - then there are 80-100% profitable trades goes...
that's about it...
Is it impossible with a martin?
in a martin there's arithmetic - and you can't beat that, it's always gonna be 50/50.
and where's the advantage in a martin? - you pinch a little, you risk losing everything.
in martin arithmetic - and you can't beat it, it's always going to be 50/50.
And where's the advantage in martin? You pinch a little, you risk losing everything.
50/50 is an unsubstantiated assertion.
The advantage is that, the vast majority of trades are buried with profits.
Why all that fixing a loss at say 25% is forbidden?