Interesting and Humour - page 4213
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What claim is the assertion that the assertor is asking you to prove by questioning it?
Dogmatic religious "truths" are not objectively validated
Reread the last couple of pages. The message and the meanings are clear. Unless, of course, there is a desire for adequate communication. And if it's an attempt to get away with your assertions, through verbatim picking on them, it's not interesting.
Verbal acrobatics and sophisms are the only thing left for adherents of dogmatism when they realise they have been nailed )))))))
Dogmatic religious "truths" are not objectively validated
unlike truths of practice: roughly speaking, descriptions of practice say "do this and that" to get/approach a certain state
and people do that and get concrete tangible results of their personal experience
and they can report their experiences so they can compile statistics of best practices
that is impossible for dogmatic religious "truths" (which, more correctly, are called fiction).
of course, both religions and mental/psychological/yogical practices operate with the inner state of a person, so we can say that all of this is very subjective
but there is a big difference: if in yoga and OS there are convincing practical results, in religion there are no such results, but only idle speculations about god (Russell's Kettle).
But if you do regularly even the basic asanas from hatha yoga, then after a short time you may notice improvements in physical well-being and functioning of subsystems of the body
the same with meditation, OSD, OVD and other practices (if you do it honestly and conscientiously)
how can dogmatic religion answer? - nothing but general speculation - no real benefit
why do people believe in this religious dogma? - simply because people are lazy and want a shortcut - they don't want to practice and they want the benefits for nothing
in a sense, religion is the choice of weak and lazy people
there is no perfection without care and diligence.
the main thing is to go for the indulgence in time, and that's it :)
Verbal acrobatics and sophisms are the only thing left for the adherents of dogmatism when they realise they are nailed )))))))
I just wanted to write about it, the sophists are attacking
Reread the last couple of pages. The message and implications are clear. If you want to communicate adequately, of course.
It is difficult to direct you in an adequate direction - there are too many unsubstantiated statements, it is not clear what came from where and where exactly it follows...
Reread the last couple of pages. The message and implications are clear. Unless, of course, there is a desire for adequate communication. And if it is an attempt to get rid of their assertions, through literal picking, it is not interesting.
So many accusations, all of them unsubstantiated and based on nothing - that's saying something)))
By the way, the question was not addressed to you - you write under different nicknames?)
Verbal acrobatics and sophisms are the only thing left for the adherents of dogmatism when they realise they are pinned down )))))))
Yes, there is a whole sheet of dogma, but in fact it makes no sense))
Yeah, well, there's a lot of dogma, but it doesn't make any sense.)
Well, it's called "Interesting and humorous."
It's not a scientific thread for a thesis.
Yeah, there's a whole sheet of dogma, but it makes no sense in fact.)
Self-criticism is definitely your strong point )))))