Interesting and Humour - page 3849
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
History is a science with its own subject and method. At our everyday level, it should be understood that any fact becomes a historical fact if this fact is interconnected with its historical context.
For example.
They write: a barrow was looted and all its contents were lost to science. But the looters made their profit by selling what they found.
So what is the loss to science?
The fact is that before taking the shard in hand, it must be described: where it was lying, next to what it was lying on, to date it - a long and painstaking process, which was not done during the looting of the mound. The found shards have therefore lost their significance for historical science.
The standard method to besmirch our history is to snatch a fact out of its context, evaluate it according to modern criteria and then receive a warning. You can see countless concrete examples on this thread from certain trolls.
History is rewritten by every government to its own advantage.
History is not usually rewritten: with the change of power, spies become spies and spies become spies. But the historical facts remain.
Another thing is that at all times there have been fantasies on historical themes: about musketeers, about the Gulag. And people want to consider such works as historical truth, even if the author considered his work as a work of fiction, rather than a historical chronicle.
In these cases one must always remember that history is a science with its own subject and method. The credibility of the facts must be repeatedly cross-checked, these facts must be placed in their historical context.
A rhetorical theme. Once the Gulag was for traitors, time passed and innocents ended up there, a little more time will pass and traitors will end up there again. What are the facts? No one can even give the exact number of people who died in WWII. Some sources give one figure, others give another. Whichever one is more profitable, that one is called. What kind of science is this that does not have clear data, and this was quite recently. Not to mention 1812, or the Roman Empire.
History is distorted, the facts are twisted, documents are burned, they are even destroyed, and after a while no one will remember what happened, because no one cares about reality, because they care about modernity much more important and interesting, history is a convenient tool for the government or its opponents. But Newton's law, this is science, does not change under any power.
Instead, history without facts and documents becomes a legend, a fictitious story and a myth. Was there really Hercules? And did he perform his 12 feats?
For example the question if Christ rose from the dead? Are there any documents or facts clearly confirming or refuting it?
A rhetorical theme. Once the Gulag was for traitors, time passed and innocents ended up there, a little more time will pass and traitors will end up there again. What are the facts? No one can even give the exact number of people who died in WWII. Some sources give one figure, others give another. Whichever one is more profitable, that one is called. What kind of science is this that does not have clear data, and this was quite recently. Not to mention 1812, or the Roman Empire.
History is distorted, the facts are twisted, documents are burned, they are even destroyed, and after a while no one will remember what happened, because no one cares about reality, because they care about modernity much more important and interesting, history is a convenient tool for the government or its opponents. But Newton's law, this is science, does not change under any power.
Instead, history without facts and documents becomes a legend, a fictitious story and a myth. Was there really Hercules? And did he perform his 12 feats?
For example the question if Christ rose from the dead? Are there any documents or facts clearly confirming or refuting it?
You are like a true Heracles mind lump everything into one pile: historical facts, political speculations on historical themes and works of fiction.
A vinaigrette.
You, like a true Hercules of thought, have lumped everything together: historical facts, political speculation on historical themes and works of fiction.
A vinaigrette.
Try reading in order.
Ooh, and a fake diploma... Well, there you go.
Hi Yura.
No one bothered to find out even a little bit, make enquiries, or just - the judge hurt someone's feelings :)
The father of the bride, not a poor businessman (engaged in agriculture, + real estate assets), who could not make such a wedding, the presence of artists is even easier to explain - the father of the bride is a relative of Meladze .......
People can count other people's money as they have not learned to earn it themselves. They should criminalize misleading people - then there would be fewer writers, and next time they would think twice before slinging mud at someone.
Hi Yura.
No one bothered to find out, make some enquiries, or maybe the judge hurt someone's feelings :)
The father of the bride, not a poor businessman (engaged in agriculture, + real estate assets), who could not make such a wedding, the presence of artists is even easier to explain - the father of the bride is a relative of Meladze .......
People can count other people's money as they have not learned to earn it themselves. There should be criminal liability for misleading people - then there would be fewer writers, and next time they would think twice before slinging mud at someone.
The judge deals with land issues in the region, and her husband owns large tracts of land in the same region.
Apart from Meladze, other relatives include Kabzon, Pavliashvili, Baskov and others.
Fine.
What do you need to do to rectify the situation? What have you done on your part to prevent the abuse?
https://nstarikov.ru/blog/82989
Starikov is so small-minded in his service deflections that it is better to read comic books
The judge deals with land issues in the region and her husband owns large tracts of land in the same region.
In addition to Meladze, other relatives include Kabzon, Pavliashvili, Baskov and others.
Her husband (ex)owned the business and land, long before she became a judge ... Of course you can't say that Kobzon and all the other artists are on good terms with each other (as friends or relatives) and they all have to pay :) Vera Brezhneva must have been paid :) Do you know whose wife she is? About Pavliashvili - have you ever been to a Georgian wedding? :) ....
He's not a creator, he's a critic. Not a single sensible suggestion, just negativity. Maybe he has a diseased liver or a brain tumour like McCain?
Have you seen the movie Schindler's List?
- Do as she says and shoot her.
You don't always have to give helpful advice out loud, and what exactly you're dissatisfied with either.
Her husband (ex-husband) owned the business, and the plots, long before she became a judge... Of course you are not suggesting that Kobzon and all the other artists are on good terms with each other and they all have to pay :) Vera Brezhneva must have been paid :) Do you know whose wife she is? About Pavliashvili - have you ever been to a Georgian wedding? :) ....
Get a grip on yourself!
If the future spouses met in Georgia, where she graduated from Tbilisi University and moved to Krasnodar Region AFTER they were married, where she became a judge, then HOW could he have owned these plots of land BEFORE they moved to Krasnodar Region and she became a judge????
Why make things up as you go along and lie???