Interesting and Humour - page 3846
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
1. Rokotov and the other two currency dealers were shot illegally because the law is NOT retroactive, and they were shot under a law that was passed AFTER they were arrested.
2. Why did you lie about "a bunch of bosses"?
Last time for free.
"The obedience of all Soviet economic bosses was built on the article 'Embezzlement'.
The mechanism was as follows.
As you know, under socialism the main thing was to fulfil the plan. The biggest disadvantage for the boss was not fulfilling the plan.
Fulfilled the plan - a bonus for each 10 rubles.
In the research institute, which I used to work, there were 1000 extraordinary academics. If you execute the plan the total award = 10 000 rubles to all research institutes.
Then comes CRU and discovers - attributed and the plan is not fulfilled. And then according to the will of their superiors. If they give the go-ahead, this 10 000 roubles was considered embezzlement, and the director was the organizer. Theft over 5 000 roubles was punishable by firing squad. Since the amount of the plan was established from above, it was always possible to put a recalcitrant director under the firing squad, which was exactly what was done.
In the 60's I heard about such cases from my parents, who drummed them into my head from childhood NOT to be a director, while in the 70's such cases were reported at the annual meetings at the end of the year.
PS.
The cotton business had a very different meaning. People there were in business and in their own pockets.
Learn the basics - the codes of the RSFSR and other republics: the article on currency transactions and the article on embezzlement. For a start.
I will teach no one but you, but only for money and only for a very large sum, as I am not sane on the grounds of anti-Soviet zombification.
https://youtu.be/QiE0h45qv-w
I open the codex on any page and can't read to the end...
And I am glad when the article is not very good, because someone will get lucky.
In the video description - what to read about the evolution of altruistic and aggressive behaviour.
ps seems relevant in the context of irrational behaviour in relation to history.
In the video description - what to read about the evolution of altruistic and aggressive behaviour.
ps seems relevant in the context of irrational behaviour in relation to history.
Well)) Psychology to destroy! Actually the work is being done actively, as can be seen here recently in one of the threads.
What else can you expect from someone who judges historical events on the basis of feature films. That's not even a question.
What else can you expect from a man who judges historical events through feature films? It's not even a question.
What exactly are you talking about? Would you be so kind as to answer, because I'm already scared for you, there are so many fantasies.
...
ps seems relevant in the context of irrational behaviour in relation to history.
and not like, but really relevant, and not in the light of history, but in the light of present reality
What exactly are you talking about?
The movie about Yugoslavia.
It's not the first time I've seen a political or feminist slur on this woman. And it's done on purpose, for the sake of viewing, causing a resonance. History leaves us with a piece of information which can then "logically" lead to one conclusion or another. But this conclusion is probabilistic and far from being the only one. In this connection every schlub can use this to its advantage and screw the soft to the hard. Relying solely on one area. And even knowing little about it, they make incredible conclusions about the universe.
At the same time they conduct seminars where people are taught this nonsense, and there are a lot of them. It would be better to say that this is only their opinion, and to give an alternative in the form of a parallel point of view. No, they pour in their ears as if it were the only true one.